Body Composition Differentiates Prediabetes Phenotype Clusters in the Diabetes Prevention Program Study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Benjamin M Stroebel, Meghana Gadgil, Kimberly A Lewis, Kayla D Longoria, Li Zhang, Elena Flowers
{"title":"Body Composition Differentiates Prediabetes Phenotype Clusters in the Diabetes Prevention Program Study.","authors":"Benjamin M Stroebel, Meghana Gadgil, Kimberly A Lewis, Kayla D Longoria, Li Zhang, Elena Flowers","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains a significant public health problem, and current approaches to risk reduction fail to adequately prevent T2D in all individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to apply clustering methods that include metabolic risk factors and body composition measures to identify and characterize prediabetes phenotypes and their relationships with treatment arm and incident T2D.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the Diabetes Prevention Program clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Previously completed Diabetes Prevention Program trial.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Subset of participants (n = 994) with body composition measures.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Unsupervised k-means clustering analysis was applied to derive the optimal number of clusters of participants based on common clinical risk factors alone or common risk factors plus more comprehensive measures of glucose tolerance and body composition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five clusters were derived from both the common clinical characteristics and the addition of comprehensive measures of glucose tolerance and body composition. Within each modeling approach, participants showed significantly different levels of individual risk factors. The clinical only model showed higher accuracy for time to T2D; however, the more comprehensive models further differentiated an overweight phenotype by overall metabolic health. For both models, the greatest differentiation in determining time to T2D was in the metformin arm of the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data-driven clustering of patients with prediabetes allows for identification of prediabetes phenotypes at greater risk for disease progression and responses to risk reduction interventions. Further investigation into phenotypic differences in treatment response could enable better personalization of prediabetes and T2D prevention and treatment choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e3665-e3672"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains a significant public health problem, and current approaches to risk reduction fail to adequately prevent T2D in all individuals.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to apply clustering methods that include metabolic risk factors and body composition measures to identify and characterize prediabetes phenotypes and their relationships with treatment arm and incident T2D.

Design: Secondary analysis of the Diabetes Prevention Program clinical trial.

Setting: Previously completed Diabetes Prevention Program trial.

Patients or other participants: Subset of participants (n = 994) with body composition measures.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Unsupervised k-means clustering analysis was applied to derive the optimal number of clusters of participants based on common clinical risk factors alone or common risk factors plus more comprehensive measures of glucose tolerance and body composition.

Results: Five clusters were derived from both the common clinical characteristics and the addition of comprehensive measures of glucose tolerance and body composition. Within each modeling approach, participants showed significantly different levels of individual risk factors. The clinical only model showed higher accuracy for time to T2D; however, the more comprehensive models further differentiated an overweight phenotype by overall metabolic health. For both models, the greatest differentiation in determining time to T2D was in the metformin arm of the trial.

Conclusion: Data-driven clustering of patients with prediabetes allows for identification of prediabetes phenotypes at greater risk for disease progression and responses to risk reduction interventions. Further investigation into phenotypic differences in treatment response could enable better personalization of prediabetes and T2D prevention and treatment choices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

身体成分在糖尿病预防项目研究中区分糖尿病前期表型簇。
背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)仍然是一个重要的公共卫生项目,目前降低风险的方法不能充分预防所有个体的T2D。目的:本研究的目的是应用包括代谢危险因素和体成分测量在内的聚类方法来识别和表征糖尿病前期表型及其与治疗组和T2D发生率的关系。设计:糖尿病预防项目临床试验的二次分析。环境:先前完成的糖尿病预防项目试验。患者或其他参与者:有身体成分测量的参与者子集(n=994)。干预措施:N / A。主要结果测量:应用无监督k-均值聚类分析,根据单独的常见临床危险因素或常见危险因素加上更全面的葡萄糖耐量和身体成分测量,得出参与者的最佳聚类数。结果:根据共同的临床特征和葡萄糖耐量和身体成分的综合测量,得出了五个聚类。在每种建模方法中,参与者表现出显著不同水平的个人风险因素。仅用于临床的模型对到达T2D的时间显示出更高的准确性,然而更全面的模型通过整体代谢健康进一步区分了超重表型。对于两种模型,在确定到达T2D的时间方面,最大的差异是在二甲双胍组。结论:数据驱动的糖尿病前期患者聚类可以识别疾病进展风险更高的糖尿病前期表型和对降低风险干预的反应。进一步研究治疗反应的表型差异可以更好地个性化糖尿病前期和T2D的预防和治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信