Evaluation of perioperative lung ultrasound scores in robotic radical prostatectomy: prospective observational study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
İrem Vuran Yaz, Emre Sertaç Bingül, Mert Canbaz, Evren Aygün, Mehmet Öner Şanlı, Faruk Özcan, Meltem Savran Karadeniz
{"title":"Evaluation of perioperative lung ultrasound scores in robotic radical prostatectomy: prospective observational study.","authors":"İrem Vuran Yaz, Emre Sertaç Bingül, Mert Canbaz, Evren Aygün, Mehmet Öner Şanlı, Faruk Özcan, Meltem Savran Karadeniz","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02272-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic major abdominal surgeries are popular worldwide, yet very few clinical studies have investigated the effects of robotic surgery setup on respiratory outcomes. In this prospective observational study, it is aimed to demonstrate the change in ultrasonographic condition of the lungs throughout the robotic surgery and its relation with respiratory outcomes. Robotic radical prostatectomy patients without any preexisting lung or cardiac pathology were enrolled in the study. Lung ultrasound score (LUS) was chosen to evaluate lungs perioperatively in three different time points that is as follows: 5 min after intubation (T1), before extubation (T2), and 30 min after extubation (T3). Blood gas analyses were made at the same time points. Primary outcome was the change of LUS comparing T3 versus T1. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative change of LUS, severe postoperative pulmonary complication incidence, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission incidence, comparison of oxygenation via PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>, and sensitivity/specificity of LUS for determining ICU admission. Total 48 patients were analyzed. T3 LUS was significantly higher than T1 LUS, and T2 was the highest amongst (15.5 [6, 25] vs 8.5 [4, 20] vs 20.5 [13, 30], respectively, p < 0.01). Pre-extubation LUS were significantly higher in patients who were admitted to ICU comparing who were not (23.5 [17, 30] vs 20 [13, 27], p = 0.03). PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio did not change among the groups significantly (p = 0.14). ROC curve of T2LUS showed 67% sensitivity and 85% specificity with a cut-off value of 22.5 for ICU admission (AUC 0.73 [0.516, 0.937], p = 0.04). LUS significantly worsened in robotic prostatectomy throughout the surgery, yet clinical deoxygenation or severe PPC were not observed. On the other hand, pre-extubation LUS may be used to determine possible ICU admission for the patients.Clinical trial registry: This study was prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05528159).</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02272-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic major abdominal surgeries are popular worldwide, yet very few clinical studies have investigated the effects of robotic surgery setup on respiratory outcomes. In this prospective observational study, it is aimed to demonstrate the change in ultrasonographic condition of the lungs throughout the robotic surgery and its relation with respiratory outcomes. Robotic radical prostatectomy patients without any preexisting lung or cardiac pathology were enrolled in the study. Lung ultrasound score (LUS) was chosen to evaluate lungs perioperatively in three different time points that is as follows: 5 min after intubation (T1), before extubation (T2), and 30 min after extubation (T3). Blood gas analyses were made at the same time points. Primary outcome was the change of LUS comparing T3 versus T1. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative change of LUS, severe postoperative pulmonary complication incidence, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission incidence, comparison of oxygenation via PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2, and sensitivity/specificity of LUS for determining ICU admission. Total 48 patients were analyzed. T3 LUS was significantly higher than T1 LUS, and T2 was the highest amongst (15.5 [6, 25] vs 8.5 [4, 20] vs 20.5 [13, 30], respectively, p < 0.01). Pre-extubation LUS were significantly higher in patients who were admitted to ICU comparing who were not (23.5 [17, 30] vs 20 [13, 27], p = 0.03). PaO2/FiO2 ratio did not change among the groups significantly (p = 0.14). ROC curve of T2LUS showed 67% sensitivity and 85% specificity with a cut-off value of 22.5 for ICU admission (AUC 0.73 [0.516, 0.937], p = 0.04). LUS significantly worsened in robotic prostatectomy throughout the surgery, yet clinical deoxygenation or severe PPC were not observed. On the other hand, pre-extubation LUS may be used to determine possible ICU admission for the patients.Clinical trial registry: This study was prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05528159).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信