Revisiting the Treatment Algorithm for Atlantoaxial Dislocation after 10 Years: A Multi-center Study with Mid-to-long-term Follow-up.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005318
Nanfang Xu, Yinglun Tian, Haoliang Zhao, Hongling Chu, Fangcai Li, Bing Wang, Peng Liu, Fei Yin, Lei Li, Linfeng Wang, Yannan Zhang, Linwei Chen, Lingqiang Chen, Jun Zhu, Zhisen Tian, Cheng Li, Feng Wang, Shilin Xue, Cheng Zhang, Weishi Li, Shenglin Wang
{"title":"Revisiting the Treatment Algorithm for Atlantoaxial Dislocation after 10 Years: A Multi-center Study with Mid-to-long-term Follow-up.","authors":"Nanfang Xu, Yinglun Tian, Haoliang Zhao, Hongling Chu, Fangcai Li, Bing Wang, Peng Liu, Fei Yin, Lei Li, Linfeng Wang, Yannan Zhang, Linwei Chen, Lingqiang Chen, Jun Zhu, Zhisen Tian, Cheng Li, Feng Wang, Shilin Xue, Cheng Zhang, Weishi Li, Shenglin Wang","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A multi-center retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To overcome the limitations of former single-center strategy studies, an updated classification guiding surgical management of Atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is proposed in this study based on a large multi-center retrospective cohort study with mid-to-long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>AAD is the most prevalent disorder affecting the cranio-vertebral junction, often leading to myelopathy and impairment of cranial nerve function, which can result in significant morbidity or even mortality. Although the treatment algorithm we previously proposed for these diseases in 2013 has been widely adopted, its effectiveness and safety in multi-center settings have yet to be thoroughly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AAD who underwent surgical treatment were recruited from eight tertiary spine centers in eight provinces (two northeastern, two southwestern, one northwestern, one southeastern, and two central) across China between January 2011 and December 2021. Patient's classification, surgical procedure, postoperative recovery progress, and occurrence of complications of the patients were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2354 patients were included. Type I and Type II constituted most patients (76.0%). For Type III AAD, our goal was conversion to Type II, first using posterior intra-articular release (212/523 patients, 40.5%), and if failed, trans-oral release (311/523 patients, 59.5%). For Type IV, we also attempted conversion to Type II, using posterior or trans-oral osteotomy (37/42 patients, 88.1%). Trans-oral and trans-nasal odontoidectomy was the last resort for decompression for patients whose AAD could not be reduced despite all efforts (5/42 patients, 11.9%). At an average follow-up of 5.3 years, 85.9% patients achieved complete anatomical AAD reduction, 98.8% demonstrated clinical or radiological signs of solid fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The classification system of AAD was updated. Advancements have been made in the management of irreducible and bony AAD, and the trans-oral release and odontoidectomy procedures were required by less AAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A multi-center retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To overcome the limitations of former single-center strategy studies, an updated classification guiding surgical management of Atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is proposed in this study based on a large multi-center retrospective cohort study with mid-to-long-term follow-up.

Summary of background data: AAD is the most prevalent disorder affecting the cranio-vertebral junction, often leading to myelopathy and impairment of cranial nerve function, which can result in significant morbidity or even mortality. Although the treatment algorithm we previously proposed for these diseases in 2013 has been widely adopted, its effectiveness and safety in multi-center settings have yet to be thoroughly evaluated.

Methods: Patients with AAD who underwent surgical treatment were recruited from eight tertiary spine centers in eight provinces (two northeastern, two southwestern, one northwestern, one southeastern, and two central) across China between January 2011 and December 2021. Patient's classification, surgical procedure, postoperative recovery progress, and occurrence of complications of the patients were collected and analyzed.

Results: 2354 patients were included. Type I and Type II constituted most patients (76.0%). For Type III AAD, our goal was conversion to Type II, first using posterior intra-articular release (212/523 patients, 40.5%), and if failed, trans-oral release (311/523 patients, 59.5%). For Type IV, we also attempted conversion to Type II, using posterior or trans-oral osteotomy (37/42 patients, 88.1%). Trans-oral and trans-nasal odontoidectomy was the last resort for decompression for patients whose AAD could not be reduced despite all efforts (5/42 patients, 11.9%). At an average follow-up of 5.3 years, 85.9% patients achieved complete anatomical AAD reduction, 98.8% demonstrated clinical or radiological signs of solid fusion.

Conclusion: The classification system of AAD was updated. Advancements have been made in the management of irreducible and bony AAD, and the trans-oral release and odontoidectomy procedures were required by less AAD patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信