Efficacy and safety of Chinese classical prescriptions for dilated cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shiyi Tao, Lintong Yu, Jun Li, Ji Wu, Xiao Xia, Yonghao Li, Deshuang Yang, Wenjie Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Chinese classical prescriptions for dilated cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.","authors":"Shiyi Tao, Lintong Yu, Jun Li, Ji Wu, Xiao Xia, Yonghao Li, Deshuang Yang, Wenjie Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02802-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chinese classical prescriptions (CCPs) are commonly utilized in China as an adjuvant treatment for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Nevertheless, there was insufficient systematic evidence data to show the advantages of CCPs plus current conventional therapy (CT) against DCM. This network meta-analysis (NMA) sought to evaluate and prioritize the six different CCP types' respective efficacies for DCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted from the databases' inception to November 30, 2024, to extract RCTs that addressed the use of CCPs in conjunction with CT for DCM. The databases included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science Periodical Database (CSPD), Chinese Citation Database (CCD), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and ClinicalTrials.gov. The Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values was employed to rank the relative efficacy. Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to evaluate the efficacy of various CCPs. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024586365).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 27 eligible RCTs involving 2019 patients were included. The evaluated outcomes included clinical effectiveness rate (CER), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac output (CO), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and six-min walk test (6MWT). According to the NMA, Zhigancao decoction (ZGCD), Zhenwu decoction (ZWD), Shenfu decoction (SFD), Shengmai powder (SMP), Yangxin decoction (YXD), and Buyang Huanwu decoction (BYHW) in addition to CT considerably enhanced DCM treatment outcomes when compared to CT alone. SMP + CT (MD = 12.75, 95%CI 8.28-17.22) showed the highest probability of being the best treatment on account of the enhancement of LVEF. SFD + CT was most likely to be the optimal intervention for LVEDD decrease (MD = -4.68, 95%CI -8.73 to -0.62). YXD + CT (MD = -4.47, 95%CI -4.47 to -4.47) had the highest likelihood of being the optimal therapy for reducing LVESD. ZGCD + CT seemed to be the most promising intervention on the improvement in hs-CRP (MD = -2.82, 95%CI -3.60 to -2.04) and 6MWT (MD = 141.00, 95%CI 136.57 to 145.43). However, the optimal CCP for improving BNP and CO could not be identified based on the present studies. No significant adverse events emerged in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This NMA indicated that adding CCPs to current CT treatment had a favorable effect on DCM. In light of the clinical efficacy and other outcomes, SMP + CT, SFD + CT, YXD + CT, and ZGCD + CT demonstrated a preferred improvement in patients with DCM when combined. Furthermore, additional larger RCTs with longer follow-up periods and standardized outcome reporting are required to give more solid evidence to support our findings due to the small sample size of the current studies and the presence of risk of bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02802-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chinese classical prescriptions (CCPs) are commonly utilized in China as an adjuvant treatment for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Nevertheless, there was insufficient systematic evidence data to show the advantages of CCPs plus current conventional therapy (CT) against DCM. This network meta-analysis (NMA) sought to evaluate and prioritize the six different CCP types' respective efficacies for DCM.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted from the databases' inception to November 30, 2024, to extract RCTs that addressed the use of CCPs in conjunction with CT for DCM. The databases included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science Periodical Database (CSPD), Chinese Citation Database (CCD), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and ClinicalTrials.gov. The Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values was employed to rank the relative efficacy. Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to evaluate the efficacy of various CCPs. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024586365).

Results: Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 27 eligible RCTs involving 2019 patients were included. The evaluated outcomes included clinical effectiveness rate (CER), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac output (CO), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and six-min walk test (6MWT). According to the NMA, Zhigancao decoction (ZGCD), Zhenwu decoction (ZWD), Shenfu decoction (SFD), Shengmai powder (SMP), Yangxin decoction (YXD), and Buyang Huanwu decoction (BYHW) in addition to CT considerably enhanced DCM treatment outcomes when compared to CT alone. SMP + CT (MD = 12.75, 95%CI 8.28-17.22) showed the highest probability of being the best treatment on account of the enhancement of LVEF. SFD + CT was most likely to be the optimal intervention for LVEDD decrease (MD = -4.68, 95%CI -8.73 to -0.62). YXD + CT (MD = -4.47, 95%CI -4.47 to -4.47) had the highest likelihood of being the optimal therapy for reducing LVESD. ZGCD + CT seemed to be the most promising intervention on the improvement in hs-CRP (MD = -2.82, 95%CI -3.60 to -2.04) and 6MWT (MD = 141.00, 95%CI 136.57 to 145.43). However, the optimal CCP for improving BNP and CO could not be identified based on the present studies. No significant adverse events emerged in the included studies.

Conclusion: This NMA indicated that adding CCPs to current CT treatment had a favorable effect on DCM. In light of the clinical efficacy and other outcomes, SMP + CT, SFD + CT, YXD + CT, and ZGCD + CT demonstrated a preferred improvement in patients with DCM when combined. Furthermore, additional larger RCTs with longer follow-up periods and standardized outcome reporting are required to give more solid evidence to support our findings due to the small sample size of the current studies and the presence of risk of bias.

中医经典方剂治疗扩张型心肌病的疗效和安全性:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
背景:中药方剂在中国被广泛用于扩张型心肌病(DCM)的辅助治疗。然而,没有足够的系统证据数据显示CCPs与当前常规治疗(CT)对抗DCM的优势。该网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在评估和优先考虑六种不同CCP类型对DCM的各自功效。方法:从数据库建立到2024年11月30日进行全面检索,以提取涉及CCPs与CT联合用于DCM的随机对照试验。数据库包括PubMed、Embase、Web of Science Core Collection、Cochrane Library、ProQuest、中国知网(CNKI)、中国科学期刊数据库(CSPD)、中国引文数据库(CCD)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和ClinicalTrials.gov。采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评价纳入的随机对照试验的质量。采用累积排序曲线下曲面(SUCRA)概率值对相对疗效进行排序。采用贝叶斯网络meta分析评价不同CCPs的疗效。本综述已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024586365)。结果:按照纳入和排除标准,纳入27项符合条件的随机对照试验,涉及2019例患者。评估结果包括临床有效率(CER)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期尺寸(LVEDD)、左室收缩末期尺寸(LVESD)、脑利钠肽(BNP)、心输出量(CO)、超敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)。根据NMA,与单独CT相比,在CT的基础上加用知草汤(ZGCD)、真武汤(ZWD)、参附汤(SFD)、生脉散(SMP)、养心汤(YXD)和补阳还武汤(BYHW)可显著提高DCM的治疗效果。SMP + CT (MD = 12.75, 95%CI 8.28 ~ 17.22)显示由于LVEF的增强,SMP + CT最有可能成为最佳治疗方法。SFD + CT最有可能是降低LVEDD的最佳干预措施(MD = -4.68, 95%CI -8.73 ~ -0.62)。YXD + CT (MD = -4.47, 95%CI -4.47 ~ -4.47)最有可能成为减少LVESD的最佳治疗方法。ZGCD + CT似乎是最有希望改善hs-CRP (MD = -2.82, 95%CI -3.60 ~ -2.04)和6MWT (MD = 141.00, 95%CI 136.57 ~ 145.43)的干预措施。然而,根据目前的研究,尚无法确定改善BNP和CO的最佳CCP。纳入的研究中未出现明显的不良事件。结论:该NMA表明在当前CT治疗中加入CCPs对DCM有良好的治疗效果。从临床疗效及其他结局来看,SMP + CT、SFD + CT、YXD + CT、ZGCD + CT联合应用对DCM患者改善效果优先。此外,由于目前的研究样本量小,存在偏倚风险,需要更多的大型随机对照试验,随访期更长,结果报告标准化,以提供更确凿的证据来支持我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信