Stephanie Morakeas, Mark Brian Tracy, Murray Hinder, Viktoria Gruber, Alistair McEwan, Thomas Drevhammar
{"title":"Does Leak Matter? A Novel Dynamic Leak Model to Simulate Leak for Performance Testing of Manual Neonatal Resuscitation Devices. A Bench Study.","authors":"Stephanie Morakeas, Mark Brian Tracy, Murray Hinder, Viktoria Gruber, Alistair McEwan, Thomas Drevhammar","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Newborn resuscitation is commonly performed in the presence of face mask leak. Leak is highly variable, pressure-dependent and often unrecognized. The effectiveness of resuscitation devices to deliver adequate inflations in the presence of leak is unknown. Bench models simulating continuous leak have the disadvantage of not accurately reflecting leak occurring during clinical resuscitation. A dynamic leak model based on pressure-release valves was thus developed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigates self-inflating bag (SIB) and T-piece resuscitator (TPR) ventilation performance in the presence of dynamic (DLM) compared to continuous (CLM) leak models in a bench study. Five predefined leak levels were tested for each leak model (0%-87%). Resuscitation devices were connected to a test lung (compliance 0.6 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O) and respiratory parameters were measured using respiratory function monitors before (patient interface) and after (actual) an induced leak at 40, 60, 80 inflations/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three thousand six hundred inflations were analyzed. DLM showed a decrease in actual tidal volumes from 0%-87% leak with tidal volume differences (SIB 4.8 mL, TPR 2.9 mL), contrasting to minimal change for CLM (SIB -0.6 mL, TPR 0.3 mL). CLM demonstrated larger differences between patient interface and actual leak. The absolute difference at 60 inflations/min at 87% leak were SIB 37.5%, TPR 18.2% for CLM compared to SIB 4.6%, TPR 1.4% for DLM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CLM may underestimate the impact of resuscitation device performance with poor correlation between patient interface and actual delivered volume. DLM demonstrates several advantages with a more accurate representation of face mask leak and will prove useful in modeling all systems delivering PPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 3","pages":"e71043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Newborn resuscitation is commonly performed in the presence of face mask leak. Leak is highly variable, pressure-dependent and often unrecognized. The effectiveness of resuscitation devices to deliver adequate inflations in the presence of leak is unknown. Bench models simulating continuous leak have the disadvantage of not accurately reflecting leak occurring during clinical resuscitation. A dynamic leak model based on pressure-release valves was thus developed.
Methods: This study investigates self-inflating bag (SIB) and T-piece resuscitator (TPR) ventilation performance in the presence of dynamic (DLM) compared to continuous (CLM) leak models in a bench study. Five predefined leak levels were tested for each leak model (0%-87%). Resuscitation devices were connected to a test lung (compliance 0.6 mL/cmH2O) and respiratory parameters were measured using respiratory function monitors before (patient interface) and after (actual) an induced leak at 40, 60, 80 inflations/min.
Results: Three thousand six hundred inflations were analyzed. DLM showed a decrease in actual tidal volumes from 0%-87% leak with tidal volume differences (SIB 4.8 mL, TPR 2.9 mL), contrasting to minimal change for CLM (SIB -0.6 mL, TPR 0.3 mL). CLM demonstrated larger differences between patient interface and actual leak. The absolute difference at 60 inflations/min at 87% leak were SIB 37.5%, TPR 18.2% for CLM compared to SIB 4.6%, TPR 1.4% for DLM.
Conclusions: CLM may underestimate the impact of resuscitation device performance with poor correlation between patient interface and actual delivered volume. DLM demonstrates several advantages with a more accurate representation of face mask leak and will prove useful in modeling all systems delivering PPV.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.