How Caregivers of Children in Early Intervention Feel About Simplified Language Input.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Julia Andary, Megan Nylund-Hackbarth, Emily Lorang, Bridget Walsh, Sarah N Douglas, Courtney E Venker
{"title":"How Caregivers of Children in Early Intervention Feel About Simplified Language Input.","authors":"Julia Andary, Megan Nylund-Hackbarth, Emily Lorang, Bridget Walsh, Sarah N Douglas, Courtney E Venker","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Caregivers of children in early intervention (EI) are commonly taught to simplify their speech, yet there is little research on caregivers' perspectives on recommended simplification strategies. We explored caregivers' opinions about using shortened and telegraphic speech and examined what caregiver and child characteristics are associated with caregiver views on simplified linguistic input.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-seven caregivers of children in EI completed an online survey on caregivers' perspectives on the language input provided to children with language delays. Using Likert scales, caregivers indicated their beliefs regarding speaking in shortened utterances (i.e., utterances with very few words) and telegraphic input (i.e., utterances that include content words such as nouns and verbs but remove function words and grammatical markings). In addition, caregivers were asked to rate the importance of a number of different factors (i.e., receptive language, expressive language, age, cognitive abilities, and diagnosis) when deciding how to speak to their children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers reported a range of views, with few feeling neutral about shortened utterances or telegraphic input. Overall, caregivers perceived telegraphic utterances as less beneficial than shortened utterances. Caregivers with less formal education had a more positive view of telegraphic utterances compared to those with more formal education. Caregivers rated receptive language as the most important factor when deciding how to speak to a child.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers of children in EI have differing views about simplified language input. Practitioners should provide a clear rationale and discuss caregivers' views about simplification approaches to better tailor their recommendations.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28452668.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1390-1397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Caregivers of children in early intervention (EI) are commonly taught to simplify their speech, yet there is little research on caregivers' perspectives on recommended simplification strategies. We explored caregivers' opinions about using shortened and telegraphic speech and examined what caregiver and child characteristics are associated with caregiver views on simplified linguistic input.

Method: Seventy-seven caregivers of children in EI completed an online survey on caregivers' perspectives on the language input provided to children with language delays. Using Likert scales, caregivers indicated their beliefs regarding speaking in shortened utterances (i.e., utterances with very few words) and telegraphic input (i.e., utterances that include content words such as nouns and verbs but remove function words and grammatical markings). In addition, caregivers were asked to rate the importance of a number of different factors (i.e., receptive language, expressive language, age, cognitive abilities, and diagnosis) when deciding how to speak to their children.

Results: Caregivers reported a range of views, with few feeling neutral about shortened utterances or telegraphic input. Overall, caregivers perceived telegraphic utterances as less beneficial than shortened utterances. Caregivers with less formal education had a more positive view of telegraphic utterances compared to those with more formal education. Caregivers rated receptive language as the most important factor when deciding how to speak to a child.

Conclusions: Caregivers of children in EI have differing views about simplified language input. Practitioners should provide a clear rationale and discuss caregivers' views about simplification approaches to better tailor their recommendations.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28452668.

早期干预儿童的照顾者对简化语言输入的感受。
目的:早期干预(EI)儿童的照顾者通常被教导简化他们的语言,但很少有研究表明照顾者对推荐的简化策略的看法。我们探讨了照顾者对使用缩短和电报式语言的看法,并研究了照顾者和儿童的哪些特征与照顾者对简化语言输入的看法有关。方法:对77名EI儿童的照顾者进行在线调查,了解照顾者对语言迟缓儿童语言输入的看法。使用李克特量表,照顾者表明了他们对缩短话语(即很少单词的话语)和电报输入(即包括名词和动词等实词但去除虚词和语法标记的话语)的看法。此外,在决定如何与孩子说话时,护理人员被要求对许多不同因素的重要性进行评级(即,接受性语言,表达性语言,年龄,认知能力和诊断)。结果:护理人员报告了一系列的观点,很少对缩短的话语或电报输入感到中立。总体而言,护理人员认为电报式话语不如缩短话语有益。与受过正规教育的人相比,受教育程度较低的照顾者对电报话语的看法更为积极。在决定如何和孩子说话时,照顾者认为接受性语言是最重要的因素。结论:EI儿童的照顾者对简化语言输入有不同的看法。从业者应该提供一个明确的理由,并讨论护理人员关于简化方法的观点,以更好地定制他们的建议。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28452668。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信