A tutorial review on methods for collecting similarity judgments from human observers.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Eben W Daggett, Michael C Hout
{"title":"A tutorial review on methods for collecting similarity judgments from human observers.","authors":"Eben W Daggett, Michael C Hout","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03044-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Similarity is a central concept in the study of cognition, having been identified as an explanatory factor in the dynamics of myriad psychological phenomena. The collection of similarity judgments, however, can be a difficult, laborious, and time-consuming process. There is presently a vast and diverse array of methodologies applied throughout the psychological sciences from which to gather judgments of similarity perceptions, and each carries its own relative advantages and disadvantages. Each method may be suitable for a specific set of contexts and stimuli but be inappropriate for others. This tutorial review is meant to serve as a guided tour of common similarity judgment-gathering methods currently utilized in the psychological sciences, and to provide an overview of how and when researchers should leverage them.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03044-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Similarity is a central concept in the study of cognition, having been identified as an explanatory factor in the dynamics of myriad psychological phenomena. The collection of similarity judgments, however, can be a difficult, laborious, and time-consuming process. There is presently a vast and diverse array of methodologies applied throughout the psychological sciences from which to gather judgments of similarity perceptions, and each carries its own relative advantages and disadvantages. Each method may be suitable for a specific set of contexts and stimuli but be inappropriate for others. This tutorial review is meant to serve as a guided tour of common similarity judgment-gathering methods currently utilized in the psychological sciences, and to provide an overview of how and when researchers should leverage them.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信