Functional Outcomes of Free Flap Reconstruction After TORS in Early-Stage HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1221
Praneet C Kaki, Neel R Sangal, Doreen Lam, Ryan M Carey, Karthik Rajasekaran, Ara Chalian, Robert M Brody, Gregory S Weinstein, Steven B Cannady
{"title":"Functional Outcomes of Free Flap Reconstruction After TORS in Early-Stage HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer.","authors":"Praneet C Kaki, Neel R Sangal, Doreen Lam, Ryan M Carey, Karthik Rajasekaran, Ara Chalian, Robert M Brody, Gregory S Weinstein, Steven B Cannady","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the unique clinical context of a retropharyngeal carotid artery (RPC), free flap reconstruction (FFR) may be used for small pathologic tumor (pT)1-2 human papillomavirus (HPV)+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) tumors to provide vessel coverage, providing a unique case-control study model. This study aims to elucidate the impact of FFR on functional outcomes following transoral robotic surgery (TORS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2010 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-institution tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cohorts were defined as FFR (with RPC) and no FFR (nFFR). A 1:2 propensity score match (PSM) was performed. The functional oral intake scale (FOIS) was used to characterize swallowing outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed in R-Studio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-PSM, 93 patients met inclusion criteria (59.8 years, 92% white, 88% male). In total, 31 (33%) underwent FFR, 77 (83%) had pT2 tumors, and 87 (93%) underwent adjuvant treatment. The FFR cohort saw increased return to the operating room (FFR 19% vs nFFR 3.3%, P < .001) and mean hospital stay (7.2 ± 2.2 vs 4.9 ± 3.1 days, P = .02). Median preoperative FOIS was similar between groups (FFR: 7.00 [interquartile range (IQR) 6.00-7.00] vs nFFR: 7.0 [7.00-7.00], P = .2) with comparable decline at first follow-up. The nFFR cohort had higher FOIS at 3 and 6 months (5.00 [5.00-6.00] vs 6.00 [5.00-7.00], P = .04). FOIS was similar after 1 year (6.00 [5.00-7.00] vs 6.00 [6.00-7.00], P = .3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FFR achieved comparable functional outcomes to nFFR at 1 year. FFR is a viable reconstructive option for pT1-2 tumors for which TORS that are amenable to surgical resection via TORS despite an anatomic barrier such as RPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the unique clinical context of a retropharyngeal carotid artery (RPC), free flap reconstruction (FFR) may be used for small pathologic tumor (pT)1-2 human papillomavirus (HPV)+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) tumors to provide vessel coverage, providing a unique case-control study model. This study aims to elucidate the impact of FFR on functional outcomes following transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Study design: Retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2010 and 2022.

Setting: Single-institution tertiary care center.

Methods: Cohorts were defined as FFR (with RPC) and no FFR (nFFR). A 1:2 propensity score match (PSM) was performed. The functional oral intake scale (FOIS) was used to characterize swallowing outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed in R-Studio.

Results: Post-PSM, 93 patients met inclusion criteria (59.8 years, 92% white, 88% male). In total, 31 (33%) underwent FFR, 77 (83%) had pT2 tumors, and 87 (93%) underwent adjuvant treatment. The FFR cohort saw increased return to the operating room (FFR 19% vs nFFR 3.3%, P < .001) and mean hospital stay (7.2 ± 2.2 vs 4.9 ± 3.1 days, P = .02). Median preoperative FOIS was similar between groups (FFR: 7.00 [interquartile range (IQR) 6.00-7.00] vs nFFR: 7.0 [7.00-7.00], P = .2) with comparable decline at first follow-up. The nFFR cohort had higher FOIS at 3 and 6 months (5.00 [5.00-6.00] vs 6.00 [5.00-7.00], P = .04). FOIS was similar after 1 year (6.00 [5.00-7.00] vs 6.00 [6.00-7.00], P = .3).

Conclusion: FFR achieved comparable functional outcomes to nFFR at 1 year. FFR is a viable reconstructive option for pT1-2 tumors for which TORS that are amenable to surgical resection via TORS despite an anatomic barrier such as RPC.

早期hpv阳性口咽癌TORS后游离皮瓣重建的功能效果。
目的:在咽后颈动脉(RPC)独特的临床背景下,游离皮瓣重建(FFR)可用于小病理肿瘤(pT)1-2人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)+口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)肿瘤提供血管覆盖,提供独特的病例对照研究模型。本研究旨在阐明FFR对经口机器人手术(TORS)后功能结局的影响。研究设计:对2010年至2022年间的电子医疗记录进行回顾性分析。环境:单一机构三级保健中心。方法:将队列定义为FFR(有RPC)和无FFR(无FFR)。进行1:2倾向评分匹配(PSM)。功能性口服摄入量表(FOIS)用于描述吞咽结果。在R-Studio中进行统计分析。结果:psm后,93例患者符合纳入标准(59.8岁,92%白人,88%男性)。总共有31例(33%)接受FFR, 77例(83%)有pT2肿瘤,87例(93%)接受辅助治疗。FFR组的手术返回率增加(FFR为19%,nFFR为3.3%)。结论:FFR与nFFR在1年的功能结局相当。对于pT1-2肿瘤,尽管存在RPC等解剖屏障,但仍可通过tor进行手术切除,FFR是一种可行的重建选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信