Behavioral Activation for Smoking Cessation in Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jesse T Kaye, Jennifer M Betts, Elana Brubaker, Kirsten Webster, Jean C Beckham, Timothy B Baker, Jessica W Cook
{"title":"Behavioral Activation for Smoking Cessation in Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jesse T Kaye, Jennifer M Betts, Elana Brubaker, Kirsten Webster, Jean C Beckham, Timothy B Baker, Jessica W Cook","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Certain psychiatric populations have especially low smoking cessation rates. This highlights the need to identify smoking treatments that increase cessation rates by addressing factors thought to impede their success. Behavioral activation (BA) targets anhedonia (ie, reward insensitivity), which is linked with difficulties in quitting smoking and that is especially common and severe amongst mental health populations, including those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Thus, BA has the potential to increment the effectiveness of standard smoking cessation treatment for people with PTSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized clinical trial for US military veterans with PTSD evaluated 8-weeks of behavioral activation versus health-smoking education counseling (contact-control) when each was used as an adjuvant to standard smoking cessation counseling and combination nicotine replacement therapy (nicotine patch + nicotine lozenge or nicotine gum). The primary outcome was biochemically confirmed 7-day point-prevalence abstinence 26 weeks after the target quit day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 124 participants randomized (mean [SD] age 49 years [12.6], 109 male [88%]), 68 (54.8%) provided final follow-up data. Intent-to-treat analyses showed that 17 participants (13.7%) had biochemically confirmed abstinence at 26 weeks (16.1% self-reported abstinence). There was no significant main effect of BA (15.9%, 10/63) vs. control adjuvant counseling (11.5%, 7/61) on biochemically confirmed abstinence at 26 weeks, nor on self-reported abstinence at 4, 12, 20, or 26 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BA intervention did not improve smoking cessation rates more than an attention-control condition when each was paired with standard cessation counseling and medication and delivered to US veterans with PTSD. Smoking treatment was not associated with psychiatric symptom exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Behavioral activation therapy has proven effective in treating people with mental health disorders and may be effective as a smoking treatment. This randomized clinical trial compared behavioral activation with intensity-matched attention-control therapy when each was used as an adjuvant to standard smoking cessation treatment (counseling + nicotine patch and lozenge or gum) among US military veterans with PTSD. Behavioral activation therapy did not produce higher smoking abstinence rates than an attention-contact control therapy when each was paired with standard smoking cessation treatment delivered to patients with PTSD. Smoking treatment was not associated with worsening of psychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01995123.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"1524-1533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Certain psychiatric populations have especially low smoking cessation rates. This highlights the need to identify smoking treatments that increase cessation rates by addressing factors thought to impede their success. Behavioral activation (BA) targets anhedonia (ie, reward insensitivity), which is linked with difficulties in quitting smoking and that is especially common and severe amongst mental health populations, including those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Thus, BA has the potential to increment the effectiveness of standard smoking cessation treatment for people with PTSD.

Methods: A randomized clinical trial for US military veterans with PTSD evaluated 8-weeks of behavioral activation versus health-smoking education counseling (contact-control) when each was used as an adjuvant to standard smoking cessation counseling and combination nicotine replacement therapy (nicotine patch + nicotine lozenge or nicotine gum). The primary outcome was biochemically confirmed 7-day point-prevalence abstinence 26 weeks after the target quit day.

Results: Of 124 participants randomized (mean [SD] age 49 years [12.6], 109 male [88%]), 68 (54.8%) provided final follow-up data. Intent-to-treat analyses showed that 17 participants (13.7%) had biochemically confirmed abstinence at 26 weeks (16.1% self-reported abstinence). There was no significant main effect of BA (15.9%, 10/63) vs. control adjuvant counseling (11.5%, 7/61) on biochemically confirmed abstinence at 26 weeks, nor on self-reported abstinence at 4, 12, 20, or 26 weeks.

Conclusions: BA intervention did not improve smoking cessation rates more than an attention-control condition when each was paired with standard cessation counseling and medication and delivered to US veterans with PTSD. Smoking treatment was not associated with psychiatric symptom exacerbation.

Implications: Behavioral activation therapy has proven effective in treating people with mental health disorders and may be effective as a smoking treatment. This randomized clinical trial compared behavioral activation with intensity-matched attention-control therapy when each was used as an adjuvant to standard smoking cessation treatment (counseling + nicotine patch and lozenge or gum) among US military veterans with PTSD. Behavioral activation therapy did not produce higher smoking abstinence rates than an attention-contact control therapy when each was paired with standard smoking cessation treatment delivered to patients with PTSD. Smoking treatment was not associated with worsening of psychiatric symptoms.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01995123.

行为激活对创伤后应激障碍退伍军人戒烟的影响:一项随机临床试验。
引言:某些精神病人群的戒烟率特别低。这突出表明,需要通过解决被认为阻碍戒烟成功的因素,确定能够提高戒烟率的吸烟治疗方法。行为激活(BA)的目标是快感缺乏(即奖励不敏感),这与戒烟困难有关,在精神健康人群中尤其常见和严重,包括创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者。因此,BA有可能增加PTSD患者标准戒烟治疗的有效性。方法:一项针对患有创伤后应激障碍的美国退伍军人的随机临床试验评估了8周的行为激活与健康吸烟教育咨询(接触控制),当每一种都被用作标准戒烟咨询和联合尼古丁替代疗法(尼古丁贴片+尼古丁含片或尼古丁口香糖)的辅助治疗时。主要结果是在目标戒烟日26周后,经生化证实的7天点流行性戒断。结果:124名随机受试者(平均[SD] 49岁[12.6],109名男性[88%])中,68名(54.8%)提供了最终随访资料。意向治疗分析显示,17名参与者(13.7%)在26周时生物化学证实禁欲(16.1%自我报告禁欲)。BA(15.9%, 10/63)与对照辅助咨询(11.5%,7/61)对26周生化证实的戒断没有显著的主要影响,对4周、12周、20周或26周自我报告的戒断也没有显著的主要影响。结论:当对患有PTSD的美国退伍军人进行标准戒烟咨询和药物治疗时,BA干预并没有比注意控制条件更能提高戒烟率。吸烟治疗与精神症状加重无关。启示:行为激活疗法已被证明在治疗精神疾病方面是有效的,并且可能与吸烟治疗一样有效。这项随机临床试验比较了行为激活疗法和强度匹配的注意力控制疗法,在患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的美国退伍军人中,每种疗法都被用作标准戒烟治疗(咨询+尼古丁贴片和含片或口香糖)的辅助疗法。当行为激活疗法与标准戒烟治疗相结合时,对PTSD患者的戒烟率并不比注意接触控制疗法高。吸烟治疗与精神症状的恶化无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信