A Randomized Controlled Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Female Sexual Dysfunction.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Zhenyue Huang, Sina Mehraban Far, Jonathan Aronov, Arshia Aalami Harandi, Kuemin Hwang, Xiaoyue Zhang, Varun Talanki, Heng Ruan, Tal Meir Cohen, Steven Weissbart, Justina Tam, Jason Kim
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Female Sexual Dysfunction.","authors":"Zhenyue Huang, Sina Mehraban Far, Jonathan Aronov, Arshia Aalami Harandi, Kuemin Hwang, Xiaoyue Zhang, Varun Talanki, Heng Ruan, Tal Meir Cohen, Steven Weissbart, Justina Tam, Jason Kim","doi":"10.1002/nau.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is a prevalent and multifaceted condition affecting women's sexual well-being. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) compared to a validated sham control in the treatment of FSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial. Participants with FSD were recruited and randomly assigned at a 1:1 allocation ratio to either PTNS or a validated sham control using transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS). Treatment was performed through weekly 30-min session for 12 weeks total. Sexual function was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks primarily using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. Urogenital distress inventory-6 was collected to evaluate for any baseline urinary incontinence/voiding dysfunction. Linear mixed-effect models for longitudinal data were used to compare FSFI scores across different time points. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 34 PTNS and 31 TENS subjects were included in our final analysis. Overall, 48% (16/34) of PTNS subjects versus 29% (11/33) of TENS subjects were no longer at risk for FSD (FSFI > 26.55) after 12 weekly treatments. Both PTNS and TENS subjects demonstrated similar improvements in FSFI total scores after 12 weeks of treatments. Interestingly, patients who did not present with baseline urogenital distress symptoms reported a statistically significant larger improvement in sexual satisfaction after PTNS treatments as compared to placebo (p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated a sustained efficacy of PTNS in improving sexual function. Specifically, patients who did not have coexisting urinary dysfunction reported significant improvement in sexual satisfaction after PTNS. Our study suggested that PTNS may have a direct neuromodulation effect on sexual dysfunction and may hold promise as a treatment modality for FSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is a prevalent and multifaceted condition affecting women's sexual well-being. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) compared to a validated sham control in the treatment of FSD.

Methods: We conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial. Participants with FSD were recruited and randomly assigned at a 1:1 allocation ratio to either PTNS or a validated sham control using transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS). Treatment was performed through weekly 30-min session for 12 weeks total. Sexual function was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks primarily using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. Urogenital distress inventory-6 was collected to evaluate for any baseline urinary incontinence/voiding dysfunction. Linear mixed-effect models for longitudinal data were used to compare FSFI scores across different time points. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC).

Results: In total, 34 PTNS and 31 TENS subjects were included in our final analysis. Overall, 48% (16/34) of PTNS subjects versus 29% (11/33) of TENS subjects were no longer at risk for FSD (FSFI > 26.55) after 12 weekly treatments. Both PTNS and TENS subjects demonstrated similar improvements in FSFI total scores after 12 weeks of treatments. Interestingly, patients who did not present with baseline urogenital distress symptoms reported a statistically significant larger improvement in sexual satisfaction after PTNS treatments as compared to placebo (p = 0.017).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated a sustained efficacy of PTNS in improving sexual function. Specifically, patients who did not have coexisting urinary dysfunction reported significant improvement in sexual satisfaction after PTNS. Our study suggested that PTNS may have a direct neuromodulation effect on sexual dysfunction and may hold promise as a treatment modality for FSD.

经皮胫神经刺激治疗女性性功能障碍的随机对照试验。
背景:女性性功能障碍(FSD)是一种影响女性性健康的普遍和多方面的疾病。本随机对照试验旨在评价经皮胫神经刺激(PTNS)与假对照治疗FSD的疗效。方法:采用单中心随机对照试验。招募FSD参与者并按1:1的分配比例随机分配到PTNS或经皮神经刺激(TENS)的假对照。治疗时间为每周30分钟,共12周。在基线、6周和12周时主要使用女性性功能指数(FSFI)问卷评估性功能。收集泌尿生殖窘迫量表-6以评估任何基线尿失禁/排尿功能障碍。纵向数据的线性混合效应模型用于比较不同时间点的FSFI得分。采用SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.)进行统计分析。卡里,NC)。结果:PTNS 34例,TENS 31例纳入最终分析。总体而言,经过12周治疗后,48%(16/34)的PTNS患者和29%(11/33)的TENS患者不再有FSD风险(FSFI bb0 26.55)。治疗12周后,PTNS和TENS受试者的FSFI总分均有相似的改善。有趣的是,与安慰剂相比,未出现基线泌尿生殖窘迫症状的患者在PTNS治疗后性满意度的改善具有统计学意义(p = 0.017)。结论:本研究证明了PTNS在改善性功能方面的持续疗效。具体来说,没有泌尿功能障碍的患者在PTNS后的性满意度有显著改善。我们的研究表明,PTNS可能对性功能障碍有直接的神经调节作用,并有望作为FSD的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信