A better self-efficacy is predictive of lower fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Data from a Almenara Lupus Cohort.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lupus Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1177/09612033251325320
Manuel F Ugarte-Gil, Rocío V Gamboa-Cárdenas, Victor Pimentel-Quiroz, Cristina Reategui-Sokolova, Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald, Francisco Zevallos, Zoila Rodriguez-Bellido, Cesar Pastor-Asurza, Risto Perich-Campos, Graciela S Alarcón
{"title":"A better self-efficacy is predictive of lower fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Data from a Almenara Lupus Cohort.","authors":"Manuel F Ugarte-Gil, Rocío V Gamboa-Cárdenas, Victor Pimentel-Quiroz, Cristina Reategui-Sokolova, Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald, Francisco Zevallos, Zoila Rodriguez-Bellido, Cesar Pastor-Asurza, Risto Perich-Campos, Graciela S Alarcón","doi":"10.1177/09612033251325320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To determine the possible predictive value of self-efficacy on fatigue in SLE patients. <b>Methods:</b> SLE patients from a single-center prevalent cohort were included. Self-efficacy was ascertained with the five instruments of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions plus the PROMIS general self-efficacy. For PROMIS instruments, a score of 50 is the average for a clinical population (people with a chronic condition), the higher score, the greater self-efficacy. Fatigue was ascertained with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F), the higher score, the lower fatigue. Generalized estimating equations were performed, using as outcome the FACIT-F in the subsequent visit, and the self-efficacy instrument in the previous visit; multivariable models were adjusted for possible confounders. All the confounders were measured in the same visit than the self-efficacy instrument. <b>Results:</b> A total of 209 patients and 563 visits were included. At baseline, FACIT-F was 33.0 (10.2), mean general self-efficacy was 47.2 (10.4), self-efficacy for managing emotions was 44.6 (8.0), for managing symptoms was 47.7 (8.2), for managing daily activities was 45.5 (7.5) for managing social interactions was 42.9 (7.9) and for managing medications and treatment was 43.9 (7.0). In the multivariable models a lower fatigue was predicted by self-efficacy for managing symptoms and managing activities. <b>Conclusion:</b> A better self-efficacy is predictive of a subsequent lower fatigue, even after adjustment for possible confounders. Strategies to improve self-efficacy in SLE patients should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"519-524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251325320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the possible predictive value of self-efficacy on fatigue in SLE patients. Methods: SLE patients from a single-center prevalent cohort were included. Self-efficacy was ascertained with the five instruments of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions plus the PROMIS general self-efficacy. For PROMIS instruments, a score of 50 is the average for a clinical population (people with a chronic condition), the higher score, the greater self-efficacy. Fatigue was ascertained with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F), the higher score, the lower fatigue. Generalized estimating equations were performed, using as outcome the FACIT-F in the subsequent visit, and the self-efficacy instrument in the previous visit; multivariable models were adjusted for possible confounders. All the confounders were measured in the same visit than the self-efficacy instrument. Results: A total of 209 patients and 563 visits were included. At baseline, FACIT-F was 33.0 (10.2), mean general self-efficacy was 47.2 (10.4), self-efficacy for managing emotions was 44.6 (8.0), for managing symptoms was 47.7 (8.2), for managing daily activities was 45.5 (7.5) for managing social interactions was 42.9 (7.9) and for managing medications and treatment was 43.9 (7.0). In the multivariable models a lower fatigue was predicted by self-efficacy for managing symptoms and managing activities. Conclusion: A better self-efficacy is predictive of a subsequent lower fatigue, even after adjustment for possible confounders. Strategies to improve self-efficacy in SLE patients should be encouraged.

更好的自我效能感预示着系统性红斑狼疮患者较低的疲劳程度:来自Almenara狼疮队列的数据。
目的:探讨自我效能感对SLE患者疲劳的预测价值。方法:纳入来自单中心流行队列的SLE患者。自我效能是通过患者报告结果测量信息系统®(PROMIS®)慢性疾病管理自我效能和PROMIS一般自我效能的五种工具来确定的。对于PROMIS仪器,50分是临床人群(患有慢性疾病的人)的平均得分,得分越高,自我效能感越强。采用慢性疾病治疗功能评估-疲劳量表(FACIT-F)确定疲劳程度,评分越高,疲劳程度越低。采用广义估计方程,以FACIT-F和自我效能量表作为结果;针对可能的混杂因素对多变量模型进行了调整。所有的混杂因素都是在同一次访问中测量的,而不是自我效能仪。结果:共纳入209例患者,就诊563次。基线时,FACIT-F为33.0(10.2),平均一般自我效能为47.2(10.4),管理情绪的自我效能为44.6(8.0),管理症状的自我效能为47.7(8.2),管理日常活动的自我效能为45.5(7.5),管理社会互动的自我效能为42.9(7.9),管理药物和治疗的自我效能为43.9(7.0)。在多变量模型中,通过管理症状和管理活动的自我效能来预测较低的疲劳。结论:更好的自我效能预示着随后较低的疲劳,即使在可能的混杂因素调整后也是如此。应该鼓励提高SLE患者自我效能感的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus
Lupus 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信