Novel Non-Destructive Detection Methods for Bretziella fagacearum in Northern Red Oak and Chestnut.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Karandeep Chahal, Ethan J Wachendorf, Laura A Miles, Adam M Grove, Martin I Chilvers, Timothy D Miles
{"title":"Novel Non-Destructive Detection Methods for <i>Bretziella fagacearum</i> in Northern Red Oak and Chestnut.","authors":"Karandeep Chahal, Ethan J Wachendorf, Laura A Miles, Adam M Grove, Martin I Chilvers, Timothy D Miles","doi":"10.1094/PHYTO-08-24-0253-R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oak wilt, caused by the fungal pathogen <i>Bretziella fagacearum</i>, spreads via root grafts and insect vectors, threating oaks (<i>Quercus</i> spp.) and chestnuts (<i>Castanea</i> spp.) in the United States. Detection and management of <i>B. fagacearum</i> are crucial, as oak wilt can devastate forested and urban ecosystems. However, diagnosing oak wilt presents challenges and requires laboratory confirmation due to symptom similarities with other stressors. Common detection methods also have limitations. In this study, we optimized and validated an existing TaqMan real-time PCR assay, comparing it with a culture-based method and using nested PCR as gold standard. We also developed a novel non-destructive sampling technique. Our optimized real-time PCR assay demonstrated a consistent 100% detection rate and accuracy across all branch sapwood samples. In contrast, the culture-based method varied significantly, achieving 100% detection rate and accuracy only for fresh samples displaying sapwood discoloration. In the absence of sapwood discoloration, the culture detection rate and accuracy were 80% and 90%, respectively. For dry samples, these rates decreased significantly to 22% and 52%. The novel non-destructive sampling method used leaf petioles of fallen leaves to detect <i>B. fagacearum</i> from two tree hosts, using both optimized real-time PCR and culture-based methods. Our real-time PCR consistently outperformed the culture-based method, regardless of symptom severity in leaf samples. The real-time PCR offers improved efficiency, specificity, sensitivity, and turnaround time compared to nested PCR and culture-based methods. Our findings highlight the potential of detecting vascular-inhabiting pathogens from leaf petiole samples, particularly in scenarios requiring non-destructive sampling and high-throughput screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":20410,"journal":{"name":"Phytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-08-24-0253-R","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oak wilt, caused by the fungal pathogen Bretziella fagacearum, spreads via root grafts and insect vectors, threating oaks (Quercus spp.) and chestnuts (Castanea spp.) in the United States. Detection and management of B. fagacearum are crucial, as oak wilt can devastate forested and urban ecosystems. However, diagnosing oak wilt presents challenges and requires laboratory confirmation due to symptom similarities with other stressors. Common detection methods also have limitations. In this study, we optimized and validated an existing TaqMan real-time PCR assay, comparing it with a culture-based method and using nested PCR as gold standard. We also developed a novel non-destructive sampling technique. Our optimized real-time PCR assay demonstrated a consistent 100% detection rate and accuracy across all branch sapwood samples. In contrast, the culture-based method varied significantly, achieving 100% detection rate and accuracy only for fresh samples displaying sapwood discoloration. In the absence of sapwood discoloration, the culture detection rate and accuracy were 80% and 90%, respectively. For dry samples, these rates decreased significantly to 22% and 52%. The novel non-destructive sampling method used leaf petioles of fallen leaves to detect B. fagacearum from two tree hosts, using both optimized real-time PCR and culture-based methods. Our real-time PCR consistently outperformed the culture-based method, regardless of symptom severity in leaf samples. The real-time PCR offers improved efficiency, specificity, sensitivity, and turnaround time compared to nested PCR and culture-based methods. Our findings highlight the potential of detecting vascular-inhabiting pathogens from leaf petiole samples, particularly in scenarios requiring non-destructive sampling and high-throughput screening.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phytopathology
Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytopathology publishes articles on fundamental research that advances understanding of the nature of plant diseases, the agents that cause them, their spread, the losses they cause, and measures that can be used to control them. Phytopathology considers manuscripts covering all aspects of plant diseases including bacteriology, host-parasite biochemistry and cell biology, biological control, disease control and pest management, description of new pathogen species description of new pathogen species, ecology and population biology, epidemiology, disease etiology, host genetics and resistance, mycology, nematology, plant stress and abiotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins, and virology. Papers dealing mainly with taxonomy, such as descriptions of new plant pathogen taxa are acceptable if they include plant disease research results such as pathogenicity, host range, etc. Taxonomic papers that focus on classification, identification, and nomenclature below the subspecies level may also be submitted to Phytopathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信