{"title":"“Look and you Will Find it—What is Unsought Will go Undetected.” Sophocles","authors":"Harriet M. Syme, Jonathan Elliott","doi":"10.1111/jvp.13502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special issue of Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics was precipitated by the launch of SGLT2-inhibitors onto the veterinary market for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in cats. It is hard to overstate the significance of a novel oral mode of treatment for diabetes given that a practitioner survey found that 1 in 10 owners will euthanise their pet because of not wanting to inject insulin (Niessen et al. <span>2017</span>). As Drs Cook and Berend comprehensively discuss in this issue of JVPT, cats are well suited to treatment with SGLT-inhibitors because unlike dogs many have some residual β-cell function (Cook and Behrend <span>2025</span>). These drugs may also be valuable in the management of insulin dysregulation that is a central feature of equine metabolic syndrome and the associated problem, equine laminitis, for which there are currently no licensed treatments (Menzies-Gow and Knowles <span>2025</span>).</p><p>Now that SGLT2-inhibitors have been brought to the veterinary market it seems opportune to consider the potential of their wider use in treatment of renal and cardiovascular disease in veterinary patients (Elliott and Oyama <span>2025</span>). The interest in their use for these indications stems from the evidence from human medicine that treatment with this class of drugs (and it does seem to be a class effect rather than being associated with any individual drug) reduces the risk of major cardiac adverse events and slows the rate of progression of diabetic kidney disease. Following these discoveries the clinical indications for these drugs have been expanded to include management of various forms of non-diabetic kidney and cardiac diseases, stemming in part from the observation that SGLT2-inhibitors actual benefits were greater in diabetic patients than would be anticipated just from the relatively mild weight loss and decrease in blood pressure.</p><p>Given the explosion in potential indications for these drugs, and the excitement surrounding their potential benefit for humans especially considering the current obesity epidemic with all its serious medical sequelae, it is easy to overlook the fact that these positive health effects were not anticipated. In fact, the huge trials that were performed with SGLT2-inhibitors were FDA-mandated studies required following the launch of any new glucose-lowering treatment due to concern that their use might be associated with ADVERSE cardiac outcomes (Udell et al. <span>2015</span>). Indeed, the finding that SGLT2-inhibitors were not detrimental, but actually improved outcomes, was really quite unexpected (Zinman et al. <span>2015</span>).</p><p>As a veterinary clinical researcher, it is possible to get quite despondent when looking at these clinical trials in humans, with the feeling that nothing on a comparable scale will ever be possible in veterinary patients. For example, a recent meta-analysis of the risk of reaching a composite end-point of End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine concentration included over 15,000 participants treated with SGLT2-inhibitors and still recorded ≤ 500 events (Sridhar et al. <span>2023</span>). It is hard to imagine that a metanalysis study of this size could ever be recapitulated on veterinary patients, large scale clinical trials are prohibitively expensive. However, there are still lessons to be learned from their experiences. These human studies show the value of detailed and rigorous studying drugs even once they are in widespread clinical use, such as occurs with EMA and FDA mandated post-authorisation pharmacovigilance studies. It is estimated that about 90% of adverse drug reactions are unreported, particularly if these are recognised and anticipated side-effects, so implementing systems that require veterinary surgeons to take additional steps to record events are unlikely to be the answer (Davies et al. <span>2024</span>). Or such recording systems may only work if there is an incentive provided, or at least the process is facilitated by systems that allow direct access from the patient's clinical notes to record an event occurring. Data mining of information that is already being collected may prove more fruitful in this regard, and there are now several ways that have been developed for searching patient management databases. These include systems that are used within individual corporate practices (e.g., Banfield PetWare) or that compile data from numerous participating practices; independent and/or corporate (e.g., VetCompass, SAVSNET, CAVSNET), as well as various pet insurance databases, particularly from countries where subscription to these systems is high and concentrated within a small number of providers (e.g., Sweden). Of course, these data mining systems will only ever be as good as the data that are entered into them, and one must accept that there will be limitations. For example, a VetCompass study of cats diagnosed with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) found that in 10% of cases this diagnosis was made solely on the basis of physical examination, without any supporting bloodwork or urinalysis (Conroy et al. <span>2019</span>). These more inclusive criteria can have both advantages and disadvantages; on the one hand not all of the cats that appear to have CKD will be confirmed with further testing, but on the other the less stringent inclusion criteria may be more representative of the general population at risk of the disease and the ways that they are being treated in first-opinion practices. Ultimately some events, such as death, or discontinuation of a drug, are incontrovertible and these data will be relatively easily extracted from medical records and could be very informative if large enough populations can be compared that have/haven't been treated with a certain drug or exposed to a particular event. This approach has recently been utilised to emulate clinical trials using veterinary clinical records to study the development of urinary incontinence and cruciate disease (Pegram et al. <span>2024a</span>, <span>2024b</span>).</p><p>An additional observation from the studies of SGLT2-inhibitors in humans is how they have disrupted the typical sequence of knowledge acquisition about a disease and its treatment. Although this may be overly simplistic one tends to consider the flow of information regarding a new class of drug as starting with the study of basic physiology, pharmacology and pathology before, if results are promising, progressing to different phases of clinical trials, probably with some animal research along the way. Unexpected highly beneficial results in clinical patients, however, triggers the reverse approach. A previous example of this is the explosion of interest in the basic anti-fibrotic mechanisms of mineralocorticoid antagonists that was triggered by the remarkable and unexpected survival benefits that followed the addition of low dose spironolactone to conventional heart failure treatment in the seminal RALES study (Pitt et al. <span>1999</span>). The clinical trials of SGLT2-inhibitors have likewise shown such promise that this is now similarly fuelling an explosion of basic science using cell culture systems and in vitro models to study the impact of these drugs on endothelial dysfunction, apoptosis, fibrosis, oxidative stress and other common pathophysiological mechanisms and this in turn may support further clinical trials for other diseases such as pulmonary hypertension and hepatic cirrhosis (Zhang et al. <span>2025</span>; Pradhan et al. <span>2025</span>). Somehow veterinary clinicians need to try to get in on the act and show how use of these drugs in our patients, with their shorter lifespan and faster disease progression rates, can provide meaningful translational data—and in doing so further the ‘One Medicine’ approach.</p><p>Harriet M. Syme and Jonathan Elliott.</p><p>JE receives research grant funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and Elanco Animal Health and has acted as a consultant for both companies. These are relevant because both companies have SGLT2 inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":"48 2","pages":"65-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvp.13502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvp.13502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This special issue of Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics was precipitated by the launch of SGLT2-inhibitors onto the veterinary market for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in cats. It is hard to overstate the significance of a novel oral mode of treatment for diabetes given that a practitioner survey found that 1 in 10 owners will euthanise their pet because of not wanting to inject insulin (Niessen et al. 2017). As Drs Cook and Berend comprehensively discuss in this issue of JVPT, cats are well suited to treatment with SGLT-inhibitors because unlike dogs many have some residual β-cell function (Cook and Behrend 2025). These drugs may also be valuable in the management of insulin dysregulation that is a central feature of equine metabolic syndrome and the associated problem, equine laminitis, for which there are currently no licensed treatments (Menzies-Gow and Knowles 2025).
Now that SGLT2-inhibitors have been brought to the veterinary market it seems opportune to consider the potential of their wider use in treatment of renal and cardiovascular disease in veterinary patients (Elliott and Oyama 2025). The interest in their use for these indications stems from the evidence from human medicine that treatment with this class of drugs (and it does seem to be a class effect rather than being associated with any individual drug) reduces the risk of major cardiac adverse events and slows the rate of progression of diabetic kidney disease. Following these discoveries the clinical indications for these drugs have been expanded to include management of various forms of non-diabetic kidney and cardiac diseases, stemming in part from the observation that SGLT2-inhibitors actual benefits were greater in diabetic patients than would be anticipated just from the relatively mild weight loss and decrease in blood pressure.
Given the explosion in potential indications for these drugs, and the excitement surrounding their potential benefit for humans especially considering the current obesity epidemic with all its serious medical sequelae, it is easy to overlook the fact that these positive health effects were not anticipated. In fact, the huge trials that were performed with SGLT2-inhibitors were FDA-mandated studies required following the launch of any new glucose-lowering treatment due to concern that their use might be associated with ADVERSE cardiac outcomes (Udell et al. 2015). Indeed, the finding that SGLT2-inhibitors were not detrimental, but actually improved outcomes, was really quite unexpected (Zinman et al. 2015).
As a veterinary clinical researcher, it is possible to get quite despondent when looking at these clinical trials in humans, with the feeling that nothing on a comparable scale will ever be possible in veterinary patients. For example, a recent meta-analysis of the risk of reaching a composite end-point of End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine concentration included over 15,000 participants treated with SGLT2-inhibitors and still recorded ≤ 500 events (Sridhar et al. 2023). It is hard to imagine that a metanalysis study of this size could ever be recapitulated on veterinary patients, large scale clinical trials are prohibitively expensive. However, there are still lessons to be learned from their experiences. These human studies show the value of detailed and rigorous studying drugs even once they are in widespread clinical use, such as occurs with EMA and FDA mandated post-authorisation pharmacovigilance studies. It is estimated that about 90% of adverse drug reactions are unreported, particularly if these are recognised and anticipated side-effects, so implementing systems that require veterinary surgeons to take additional steps to record events are unlikely to be the answer (Davies et al. 2024). Or such recording systems may only work if there is an incentive provided, or at least the process is facilitated by systems that allow direct access from the patient's clinical notes to record an event occurring. Data mining of information that is already being collected may prove more fruitful in this regard, and there are now several ways that have been developed for searching patient management databases. These include systems that are used within individual corporate practices (e.g., Banfield PetWare) or that compile data from numerous participating practices; independent and/or corporate (e.g., VetCompass, SAVSNET, CAVSNET), as well as various pet insurance databases, particularly from countries where subscription to these systems is high and concentrated within a small number of providers (e.g., Sweden). Of course, these data mining systems will only ever be as good as the data that are entered into them, and one must accept that there will be limitations. For example, a VetCompass study of cats diagnosed with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) found that in 10% of cases this diagnosis was made solely on the basis of physical examination, without any supporting bloodwork or urinalysis (Conroy et al. 2019). These more inclusive criteria can have both advantages and disadvantages; on the one hand not all of the cats that appear to have CKD will be confirmed with further testing, but on the other the less stringent inclusion criteria may be more representative of the general population at risk of the disease and the ways that they are being treated in first-opinion practices. Ultimately some events, such as death, or discontinuation of a drug, are incontrovertible and these data will be relatively easily extracted from medical records and could be very informative if large enough populations can be compared that have/haven't been treated with a certain drug or exposed to a particular event. This approach has recently been utilised to emulate clinical trials using veterinary clinical records to study the development of urinary incontinence and cruciate disease (Pegram et al. 2024a, 2024b).
An additional observation from the studies of SGLT2-inhibitors in humans is how they have disrupted the typical sequence of knowledge acquisition about a disease and its treatment. Although this may be overly simplistic one tends to consider the flow of information regarding a new class of drug as starting with the study of basic physiology, pharmacology and pathology before, if results are promising, progressing to different phases of clinical trials, probably with some animal research along the way. Unexpected highly beneficial results in clinical patients, however, triggers the reverse approach. A previous example of this is the explosion of interest in the basic anti-fibrotic mechanisms of mineralocorticoid antagonists that was triggered by the remarkable and unexpected survival benefits that followed the addition of low dose spironolactone to conventional heart failure treatment in the seminal RALES study (Pitt et al. 1999). The clinical trials of SGLT2-inhibitors have likewise shown such promise that this is now similarly fuelling an explosion of basic science using cell culture systems and in vitro models to study the impact of these drugs on endothelial dysfunction, apoptosis, fibrosis, oxidative stress and other common pathophysiological mechanisms and this in turn may support further clinical trials for other diseases such as pulmonary hypertension and hepatic cirrhosis (Zhang et al. 2025; Pradhan et al. 2025). Somehow veterinary clinicians need to try to get in on the act and show how use of these drugs in our patients, with their shorter lifespan and faster disease progression rates, can provide meaningful translational data—and in doing so further the ‘One Medicine’ approach.
Harriet M. Syme and Jonathan Elliott.
JE receives research grant funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and Elanco Animal Health and has acted as a consultant for both companies. These are relevant because both companies have SGLT2 inhibitors.
《兽医药理学与治疗学杂志》的这一期特刊是由用于治疗猫糖尿病的sglt2抑制剂进入兽医市场而促成的。鉴于一项从业者调查发现,十分之一的宠物主人会因为不想注射胰岛素而对宠物实施安乐死,因此很难夸大新型口服糖尿病治疗模式的重要性(Niessen et al. 2017)。正如Cook和Berend博士在本期《JVPT》中全面讨论的那样,猫非常适合使用sglt抑制剂治疗,因为与狗不同,许多猫有一些残留的β细胞功能(Cook和Behrend 2025)。这些药物在治疗胰岛素失调方面也很有价值,胰岛素失调是马代谢综合征和相关问题马板炎的核心特征,目前还没有获得许可的治疗方法(Menzies-Gow和Knowles 2025)。现在,sglt2抑制剂已经被引入兽医市场,似乎是时候考虑它们在兽医患者肾脏和心血管疾病治疗中的更广泛应用的潜力了(Elliott和Oyama 2025)。将其用于这些适应症的兴趣源于人类医学的证据,即用这类药物治疗(它似乎确实是一类效应,而不是与任何一种药物相关)可降低主要心脏不良事件的风险,并减缓糖尿病肾病的进展速度。在这些发现之后,这些药物的临床适应症已经扩展到包括各种形式的非糖尿病肾病和心脏病的治疗,部分原因是观察到sglt2抑制剂对糖尿病患者的实际益处比预期的相对轻微的体重减轻和血压降低更大。考虑到这些药物的潜在适应症的爆炸式增长,以及围绕它们对人类潜在益处的兴奋,特别是考虑到当前肥胖的流行及其所有严重的医学后遗症,很容易忽视这样一个事实,即这些积极的健康影响是没有预料到的。事实上,由于担心sglt2抑制剂的使用可能与不良心脏结果相关,任何新的降糖治疗推出后,都需要fda授权进行sglt2抑制剂的大规模试验(Udell et al. 2015)。事实上,sglt2抑制剂并不有害,实际上改善了结果,这一发现确实非常出乎意料(Zinman et al. 2015)。作为一名兽医临床研究人员,当看到这些人体临床试验时,可能会感到非常沮丧,感觉在兽医患者身上不可能有类似规模的试验。例如,最近的一项荟萃分析分析了达到终末期肾病(ESKD)、肾性死亡或血清肌酐浓度翻倍的复合终点的风险,包括超过15,000名接受sglt2抑制剂治疗的参与者,但仍记录了≤500个事件(Sridhar et al. 2023)。很难想象这种规模的荟萃分析研究可以在兽医病人身上重现,大规模的临床试验是非常昂贵的。然而,我们仍然可以从他们的经历中吸取教训。这些人体研究表明,即使药物在临床广泛使用,如EMA和FDA规定的授权后药物警戒研究,也需要对药物进行详细和严格的研究。据估计,大约90%的药物不良反应没有报告,特别是如果这些副作用是公认的和可预见的,因此实施要求兽医采取额外步骤记录事件的系统不太可能是答案(Davies et al. 2024)。或者,这样的记录系统可能只有在提供了激励的情况下才能工作,或者至少通过允许从患者的临床笔记直接访问以记录发生的事件的系统来促进该过程。对已经收集的信息进行数据挖掘可能在这方面更有成效,现在已经开发了几种用于搜索患者管理数据库的方法。这些系统包括在个别公司实践中使用的系统(例如,Banfield PetWare)或从许多参与实践中编译数据的系统;独立和/或公司(例如,VetCompass, SAVSNET, CAVSNET),以及各种宠物保险数据库,特别是来自这些系统订阅量高且集中在少数供应商(例如,瑞典)的国家。当然,这些数据挖掘系统只能和输入其中的数据一样好,而且必须接受存在局限性。 例如,VetCompass对被诊断患有慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的猫进行的一项研究发现,在10%的病例中,这种诊断仅仅是根据体检做出的,没有任何支持性的血液检查或尿液分析(Conroy et al. 2019)。这些更具包容性的标准可能既有优点也有缺点;一方面,并非所有患有CKD的猫都将通过进一步的测试得到证实,但另一方面,不太严格的纳入标准可能更能代表一般人群的疾病风险,以及他们在第一意见实践中的治疗方式。最终,一些事件,如死亡或停药,是无可争议的,这些数据将相对容易地从医疗记录中提取出来,如果可以比较足够大的人口是否接受过某种药物治疗或接触过某种特定事件,则可以提供非常丰富的信息。这种方法最近被用来模拟临床试验,利用兽医临床记录来研究尿失禁和十字交叉疾病的发展(Pegram等人,2024a, 2024b)。从对人类sglt2抑制剂的研究中获得的另一个观察结果是,它们如何扰乱了关于疾病及其治疗的典型知识获取顺序。虽然这可能过于简单,但人们倾向于认为,关于一种新型药物的信息流是从基础生理学、药理学和病理学研究开始的,如果结果有希望,就会进入临床试验的不同阶段,可能还会进行一些动物研究。然而,在临床患者中意想不到的高度有益的结果引发了相反的方法。之前的一个例子是,在RALES的一项重要研究中,在常规心力衰竭治疗中加入低剂量螺内酯后,获得了显著的意想不到的生存益处,这引发了人们对矿物皮质激素拮抗剂基本抗纤维化机制的兴趣激增(Pitt et al. 1999)。sglt2抑制剂的临床试验同样显示出这样的前景,这现在同样推动了基础科学的爆发,使用细胞培养系统和体外模型来研究这些药物对内皮功能障碍、细胞凋亡、纤维化、氧化应激和其他常见病理生理机制的影响,这反过来可能支持其他疾病的进一步临床试验,如肺动脉高压和肝硬化(Zhang et al. 2025;Pradhan et al. 2025)。在某种程度上,兽医临床医生需要尝试参与进来,并展示如何在我们的患者中使用这些药物,这些药物的寿命更短,疾病进展速度更快,可以提供有意义的转化数据,从而进一步推进“一种药物”的方法。哈丽特·m·赛姆和乔纳森·艾略特。JE获得勃林格殷格翰和Elanco动物保健公司的研究资助,并担任两家公司的顾问。这是相关的,因为两家公司都有SGLT2抑制剂。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JVPT) is an international journal devoted to the publication of scientific papers in the basic and clinical aspects of veterinary pharmacology and toxicology, whether the study is in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo or in silico. The Journal is a forum for recent scientific information and developments in the discipline of veterinary pharmacology, including toxicology and therapeutics. Studies that are entirely in vitro will not be considered within the scope of JVPT unless the study has direct relevance to the use of the drug (including toxicants and feed additives) in veterinary species, or that it can be clearly demonstrated that a similar outcome would be expected in vivo. These studies should consider approved or widely used veterinary drugs and/or drugs with broad applicability to veterinary species.