A systematic review of reviews on ventriculostomy related infection definitions: A fundamental problem.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mikael Håndstad, Adam Alaoui-Ismaili, Marianne Juhler, Tiit Illimar Mathiesen
{"title":"A systematic review of reviews on ventriculostomy related infection definitions: A fundamental problem.","authors":"Mikael Håndstad, Adam Alaoui-Ismaili, Marianne Juhler, Tiit Illimar Mathiesen","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03447-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite being a common, well-recognized and important complication to External Ventricular Drainage (EVD), a consensus definition for Ventriculostomy Related Infections (VRI) has not yet been established. We conducted a review to qualitatively assess definition heterogeneity and objectivity among Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs); and investigated systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews of the literature for definition citation accuracy and common methodological approaches and points of discussion related to VRI definitions. RCTs were grouped into arbitrarily chosen infection rate brackets to examine the hypothesized correlation between broader definitions and higher infection rates in RCTs. A literature search was conducted via Ovid in the Embase, MedLine and Cochrane databases from all years until the 8th of January 2025. Using Covidence, two authors (MH, AA) independently evaluated records, including studies that had ≥ 1 VRI definitions and numerical VRI rates. We identified 12 definitions in 13 RCTs, documenting pronounced disagreement. Cumulative rates for \"definitive\" VRI (8.4%) were lower than \"suspected\" VRI (13.5%). Qualitatively assessed, studies with narrow definitions presented lower VRI rates. All 17/17 meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and 15/19 literature reviews cited ≥ 1 definition inaccurately. Trial results may change based on definition choice. Definition heterogeneity was not sufficiently accounted for in meta-analyses. All literature-based studies were confounded by definition heterogeneity. Previously reported findings based on meta-analytical methodologies may be invalid, and inaccurately presented definitions could give a false impression of trial comparability. A consensus set of definitions are necessary to allow comparison between studies, and should be constructed to account for the intended use since sensitivity and specificity may have different weight depending on the context.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03447-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being a common, well-recognized and important complication to External Ventricular Drainage (EVD), a consensus definition for Ventriculostomy Related Infections (VRI) has not yet been established. We conducted a review to qualitatively assess definition heterogeneity and objectivity among Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs); and investigated systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews of the literature for definition citation accuracy and common methodological approaches and points of discussion related to VRI definitions. RCTs were grouped into arbitrarily chosen infection rate brackets to examine the hypothesized correlation between broader definitions and higher infection rates in RCTs. A literature search was conducted via Ovid in the Embase, MedLine and Cochrane databases from all years until the 8th of January 2025. Using Covidence, two authors (MH, AA) independently evaluated records, including studies that had ≥ 1 VRI definitions and numerical VRI rates. We identified 12 definitions in 13 RCTs, documenting pronounced disagreement. Cumulative rates for "definitive" VRI (8.4%) were lower than "suspected" VRI (13.5%). Qualitatively assessed, studies with narrow definitions presented lower VRI rates. All 17/17 meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and 15/19 literature reviews cited ≥ 1 definition inaccurately. Trial results may change based on definition choice. Definition heterogeneity was not sufficiently accounted for in meta-analyses. All literature-based studies were confounded by definition heterogeneity. Previously reported findings based on meta-analytical methodologies may be invalid, and inaccurately presented definitions could give a false impression of trial comparability. A consensus set of definitions are necessary to allow comparison between studies, and should be constructed to account for the intended use since sensitivity and specificity may have different weight depending on the context.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信