Effect of Pupil, Spherical Aberration, Decentration, and Tilt on the Optical Performance of Five Different Monofocal IOLs.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Xiaomin Liu, Guangliang Cao, Weina Wang, Yusen Huang
{"title":"Effect of Pupil, Spherical Aberration, Decentration, and Tilt on the Optical Performance of Five Different Monofocal IOLs.","authors":"Xiaomin Liu, Guangliang Cao, Weina Wang, Yusen Huang","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250129-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate and compare the effect of pupil size, spherical aberration (SA), decentration, and tilt on the optical performance of five different monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four aspheric IOLs (Vivinex, Hoya; SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories, Inc; ZCB00, Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision; Akreos Adapt AO, Bausch & Lomb) with different SA values and one spherical IOL (SN60AT, Alcon Laboratories, Inc) were tested using an OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 optical bench. The IOL diopter was measured at different apertures. The optical quality of the IOLs was evaluated using the modulation transfer function (MTF), through-focus MTF, and images of the United States Air Force Target test with different apertures and corneal SA values. The IOLs were also measured while they were decentered and tilted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The smaller the aperture, the wider the through-focus MTF of all tested IOLs, and the best image quality was observed with a 3-mm aperture. The diopter of aspheric IOLs with negative SA were negatively correlated with aperture size, but the result was opposite for spherical IOLs. The IOL power difference was more than 0.50 diopters between different apertures. All aspheric IOLs had similar MTF curves with a 3-mm aperture. Aspheric IOLs had the best visual quality with the same or similar corneal SAs. Most of the tested IOLs had lower tolerances in tilt than in decentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pupil size, SA value, the degree of decentration, and tilt had different effects on the optical performance of aspheric IOLs. The results can provide guidance for surgeons in clinical practice. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(3):e220-e230.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 3","pages":"e220-e230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250129-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the effect of pupil size, spherical aberration (SA), decentration, and tilt on the optical performance of five different monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods: Four aspheric IOLs (Vivinex, Hoya; SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories, Inc; ZCB00, Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision; Akreos Adapt AO, Bausch & Lomb) with different SA values and one spherical IOL (SN60AT, Alcon Laboratories, Inc) were tested using an OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 optical bench. The IOL diopter was measured at different apertures. The optical quality of the IOLs was evaluated using the modulation transfer function (MTF), through-focus MTF, and images of the United States Air Force Target test with different apertures and corneal SA values. The IOLs were also measured while they were decentered and tilted.

Results: The smaller the aperture, the wider the through-focus MTF of all tested IOLs, and the best image quality was observed with a 3-mm aperture. The diopter of aspheric IOLs with negative SA were negatively correlated with aperture size, but the result was opposite for spherical IOLs. The IOL power difference was more than 0.50 diopters between different apertures. All aspheric IOLs had similar MTF curves with a 3-mm aperture. Aspheric IOLs had the best visual quality with the same or similar corneal SAs. Most of the tested IOLs had lower tolerances in tilt than in decentration.

Conclusions: Pupil size, SA value, the degree of decentration, and tilt had different effects on the optical performance of aspheric IOLs. The results can provide guidance for surgeons in clinical practice. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(3):e220-e230.].

瞳孔、球差、离差和倾斜对五种不同单焦点人工晶体光学性能的影响。
目的:评价和比较5种不同单焦人工晶状体(iol)的瞳孔大小、球差(SA)、离体和倾斜度对光学性能的影响。方法:四个非球面iol (Vivinex, Hoya;SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories, Inc;ZCB00,强生外科视力;使用optisphere IOL PRO 2光学平台测试不同SA值的Akreos Adapt AO, Bausch & Lomb)和一个球形IOL (SN60AT, Alcon Laboratories, Inc)。测定不同孔径下的人工晶状体屈光度。采用调制传递函数(MTF)、透焦MTF和不同孔径和角膜SA值的美国空军目标测试图像评价人工晶体的光学质量。当人工晶状体偏心和倾斜时,也测量人工晶状体。结果:孔径越小,所有iol的透焦MTF越宽,孔径为3mm时成像质量最佳。负SA的非球面iol的屈光度与孔径大小呈负相关,而球形iol的屈光度与孔径大小相反。不同孔径的人工晶状体度数差异均大于0.50屈光度。所有非球面iol在孔径为3mm时MTF曲线相似。在角膜sa相同或相近的情况下,非球面人工晶状体的视觉质量最好。大多数测试的人工晶状体在倾斜上的容忍度低于在偏心上的容忍度。结论:瞳孔大小、SA值、晶状体离体程度和晶状体倾角对非球面人工晶体的光学性能有不同程度的影响。结果可为外科医生的临床实践提供指导。[J].中国光学精密工程,2015;41(3):888 - 888。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信