Microbiological, Inflammatory and Clinical Outcome of Citric Acid Passivated Definitive Abutments: Interim 12-Month Results From a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Javi Vilarrasa, Carlos Pereira Couto, Gerard Àlvarez, Neus Carrió, Javier Gil, Vanessa Blanc, José Nart
{"title":"Microbiological, Inflammatory and Clinical Outcome of Citric Acid Passivated Definitive Abutments: Interim 12-Month Results From a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Javi Vilarrasa, Carlos Pereira Couto, Gerard Àlvarez, Neus Carrió, Javier Gil, Vanessa Blanc, José Nart","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy of citric acid passivation on implant abutments by evaluating their impact on bacterial load, microbiome composition, inflammatory response, and clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with control abutments over a 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implants were placed subcrestally in the posterior sextants and randomly assigned to receive a 2-mm high definitive abutment, either with citric acid passivation (CA group) or without (CTR group). Final restorations were delivered after 12 weeks. Samples of the peri-implant crevicular fluid were collected at 3, 6 and 12 months for microbiological and inflammatory analysis. Clinical and radiographic measurements were also performed at these intervals. The primary outcome was total bacterial quantification (log CFU/mL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 17 patients in the CA group and 16 in the CTR group were analysed. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in total bacterial load between groups (p = 0.689). The biofilm was predominantly composed of commensal bacterial genera in both groups throughout the study period. Although no significant differences were observed in the microbiome alpha- and beta-diversity (p > 0.05), the microbiome within study time points showed an increased beta-diversity in the CA group at 12 months (p = 0.019). CA abutments also showed a higher differential abundance of peri-implant pathogenic bacterial genera at 12 months. At the 6-month mark, the CA group exhibited a trend toward lower IL-1β levels compared with the CTR group (p = 0.072). No significant differences were noted in other clinical or radiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Citric acid passivation of definitive abutments does not enhance the microbiological or inflammatory profiles in the short term. Further studies are needed to explore the potential benefits of citric acid passivation on implant abutments.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Initially registered on clinicatrials.gov (NCT05592327).</p>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the efficacy of citric acid passivation on implant abutments by evaluating their impact on bacterial load, microbiome composition, inflammatory response, and clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with control abutments over a 12-month follow-up period.

Methods: Implants were placed subcrestally in the posterior sextants and randomly assigned to receive a 2-mm high definitive abutment, either with citric acid passivation (CA group) or without (CTR group). Final restorations were delivered after 12 weeks. Samples of the peri-implant crevicular fluid were collected at 3, 6 and 12 months for microbiological and inflammatory analysis. Clinical and radiographic measurements were also performed at these intervals. The primary outcome was total bacterial quantification (log CFU/mL).

Results: Data from 17 patients in the CA group and 16 in the CTR group were analysed. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in total bacterial load between groups (p = 0.689). The biofilm was predominantly composed of commensal bacterial genera in both groups throughout the study period. Although no significant differences were observed in the microbiome alpha- and beta-diversity (p > 0.05), the microbiome within study time points showed an increased beta-diversity in the CA group at 12 months (p = 0.019). CA abutments also showed a higher differential abundance of peri-implant pathogenic bacterial genera at 12 months. At the 6-month mark, the CA group exhibited a trend toward lower IL-1β levels compared with the CTR group (p = 0.072). No significant differences were noted in other clinical or radiographic parameters.

Conclusions: Citric acid passivation of definitive abutments does not enhance the microbiological or inflammatory profiles in the short term. Further studies are needed to explore the potential benefits of citric acid passivation on implant abutments.

Trial registration: Initially registered on clinicatrials.gov (NCT05592327).

微生物学,炎症和临床结果柠檬酸钝化最终基台:随机对照临床试验的中期12个月结果。
目的:在为期12个月的随访期间,通过评估其对细菌负荷、微生物组组成、炎症反应以及临床和影像学结果的影响,评估柠檬酸钝化对种植基牙的疗效。方法:种植体放置于后六分仪的牙冠下,随机分配接受2 mm高端基台,柠檬酸钝化组(CA组)或未柠檬酸钝化组(CTR组)。12周后进行最终修复。在第3、6和12个月采集种植体周围沟液样本进行微生物学和炎症分析。临床和放射学测量也在这些间隔进行。主要终点是细菌总数(log CFU/mL)。结果:分析了17例CA组患者和16例CTR组患者的数据。12个月时,两组总细菌载量无显著差异(p = 0.689)。在整个研究期间,两组的生物膜主要由共生细菌属组成。虽然在微生物组α -和β -多样性方面没有观察到显著差异(p > 0.05),但在研究时间点内,CA组在12个月时的β -多样性有所增加(p = 0.019)。CA基牙在12个月时也显示出更高的种植体周围病原菌属的差异丰度。在6个月时,与CTR组相比,CA组表现出IL-1β水平降低的趋势(p = 0.072)。其他临床或影像学参数无显著差异。结论:柠檬酸钝化最终基台在短期内不会增强微生物学或炎症谱。柠檬酸钝化对种植基台的潜在益处有待进一步研究。试验注册:初步注册在clinicatrials.gov (NCT05592327)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信