A qualitative study exploring community pharmacists' perceptions and experiences with information transfer from Queensland health hospitals during patients' transitions of care.
Melanie Rose Bailey, Laetitia Hattingh, Mathew Percival, Henry Ndukwe
{"title":"A qualitative study exploring community pharmacists' perceptions and experiences with information transfer from Queensland health hospitals during patients' transitions of care.","authors":"Melanie Rose Bailey, Laetitia Hattingh, Mathew Percival, Henry Ndukwe","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions of information transfer from Queensland health hospitals for patients during transitions of care and the current utilization of electronic medical records for accessing patient information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative methodology was used involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists to explore their experiences and perceptions with information transfer during patients' transitions of care. Purposive sampling was used to ensure the participation of community pharmacists who had experience with the medication management of patients discharged from Queensland health hospitals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Reporting was undertaken in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Thirteen community pharmacists were interviewed between September 2023 and January 2024, one-on-one interviews were a mean of 23 minutes (SD +/- 3.22). Community pharmacists believed their role to include medication management, counselling, and ensuring patients follow-up with their general practitioners. Barriers included a lack of information transfer from the hospital, medication errors on discharge medication records and prescriptions, time constraints in the community pharmacy setting, and a lack of patient health literacy. The main modes of information transfer were phone calls, with emails containing discharge medication lists and prescriptions. Electronic medical records were not utilized by the community pharmacists; however, pharmacists were in support of their future use for patient medical information during transitions of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future studies should address the challenges to patient and health practitioner uptake of electronic medical records, the possibility of training and support to mitigate the barriers of integrating platforms into existing software, how to ensure a consistent upload of patient data, and to address concerns with patient privacy and confidentiality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study explored community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions of information transfer from Queensland health hospitals for patients during transitions of care and the current utilization of electronic medical records for accessing patient information.
Methods: Qualitative methodology was used involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists to explore their experiences and perceptions with information transfer during patients' transitions of care. Purposive sampling was used to ensure the participation of community pharmacists who had experience with the medication management of patients discharged from Queensland health hospitals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Reporting was undertaken in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) guidelines.
Key findings: Thirteen community pharmacists were interviewed between September 2023 and January 2024, one-on-one interviews were a mean of 23 minutes (SD +/- 3.22). Community pharmacists believed their role to include medication management, counselling, and ensuring patients follow-up with their general practitioners. Barriers included a lack of information transfer from the hospital, medication errors on discharge medication records and prescriptions, time constraints in the community pharmacy setting, and a lack of patient health literacy. The main modes of information transfer were phone calls, with emails containing discharge medication lists and prescriptions. Electronic medical records were not utilized by the community pharmacists; however, pharmacists were in support of their future use for patient medical information during transitions of care.
Conclusions: Future studies should address the challenges to patient and health practitioner uptake of electronic medical records, the possibility of training and support to mitigate the barriers of integrating platforms into existing software, how to ensure a consistent upload of patient data, and to address concerns with patient privacy and confidentiality.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.