A qualitative study exploring community pharmacists' perceptions and experiences with information transfer from Queensland health hospitals during patients' transitions of care.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Melanie Rose Bailey, Laetitia Hattingh, Mathew Percival, Henry Ndukwe
{"title":"A qualitative study exploring community pharmacists' perceptions and experiences with information transfer from Queensland health hospitals during patients' transitions of care.","authors":"Melanie Rose Bailey, Laetitia Hattingh, Mathew Percival, Henry Ndukwe","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions of information transfer from Queensland health hospitals for patients during transitions of care and the current utilization of electronic medical records for accessing patient information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative methodology was used involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists to explore their experiences and perceptions with information transfer during patients' transitions of care. Purposive sampling was used to ensure the participation of community pharmacists who had experience with the medication management of patients discharged from Queensland health hospitals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Reporting was undertaken in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Thirteen community pharmacists were interviewed between September 2023 and January 2024, one-on-one interviews were a mean of 23 minutes (SD +/- 3.22). Community pharmacists believed their role to include medication management, counselling, and ensuring patients follow-up with their general practitioners. Barriers included a lack of information transfer from the hospital, medication errors on discharge medication records and prescriptions, time constraints in the community pharmacy setting, and a lack of patient health literacy. The main modes of information transfer were phone calls, with emails containing discharge medication lists and prescriptions. Electronic medical records were not utilized by the community pharmacists; however, pharmacists were in support of their future use for patient medical information during transitions of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future studies should address the challenges to patient and health practitioner uptake of electronic medical records, the possibility of training and support to mitigate the barriers of integrating platforms into existing software, how to ensure a consistent upload of patient data, and to address concerns with patient privacy and confidentiality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions of information transfer from Queensland health hospitals for patients during transitions of care and the current utilization of electronic medical records for accessing patient information.

Methods: Qualitative methodology was used involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists to explore their experiences and perceptions with information transfer during patients' transitions of care. Purposive sampling was used to ensure the participation of community pharmacists who had experience with the medication management of patients discharged from Queensland health hospitals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Reporting was undertaken in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) guidelines.

Key findings: Thirteen community pharmacists were interviewed between September 2023 and January 2024, one-on-one interviews were a mean of 23 minutes (SD +/- 3.22). Community pharmacists believed their role to include medication management, counselling, and ensuring patients follow-up with their general practitioners. Barriers included a lack of information transfer from the hospital, medication errors on discharge medication records and prescriptions, time constraints in the community pharmacy setting, and a lack of patient health literacy. The main modes of information transfer were phone calls, with emails containing discharge medication lists and prescriptions. Electronic medical records were not utilized by the community pharmacists; however, pharmacists were in support of their future use for patient medical information during transitions of care.

Conclusions: Future studies should address the challenges to patient and health practitioner uptake of electronic medical records, the possibility of training and support to mitigate the barriers of integrating platforms into existing software, how to ensure a consistent upload of patient data, and to address concerns with patient privacy and confidentiality.

一项质性研究探讨社区药剂师的看法和经验,从昆士兰卫生医院的信息转移,在病人的护理过渡。
目的:本研究探讨昆士兰州卫生医院的社区药师在转诊过程中对患者信息传递的经验和看法,以及目前电子病历获取患者信息的使用情况。方法:采用质性方法对社区药师进行深度半结构化访谈,探讨他们在患者转诊过程中对信息传递的感受。采用有目的的抽样,以确保具有昆士兰州卫生医院出院患者用药管理经验的社区药剂师的参与。采访被逐字记录和转录,并按主题进行分析。报告是根据报告质量研究的综合标准(COREQ)准则进行的。主要发现:在2023年9月至2024年1月期间,对13名社区药师进行了访谈,一对一访谈平均为23分钟(SD +/- 3.22)。社区药剂师认为他们的角色包括药物管理,咨询,并确保患者与他们的全科医生随访。障碍包括缺乏从医院传递的信息、出院药物记录和处方上的用药错误、社区药房环境中的时间限制以及缺乏患者健康知识。信息传递的主要方式是电话,电子邮件包含出院药物清单和处方。社区药剂师未使用电子病历;然而,药剂师支持他们未来在护理过渡期间使用患者医疗信息。结论:未来的研究应解决患者和医疗从业人员接受电子病历的挑战,培训和支持的可能性,以减轻将平台集成到现有软件中的障碍,如何确保患者数据的一致上传,以及解决患者隐私和机密性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信