Gut Microbiota Differences Among Patients with Burns with Varied Pruritus Responses: A Case Report.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yeongyun Jung, Yoon Soo Cho
{"title":"Gut Microbiota Differences Among Patients with Burns with Varied Pruritus Responses: A Case Report.","authors":"Yeongyun Jung, Yoon Soo Cho","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pruritus-a common symptom in patients with burns- impairs the quality of life and contributes to anxiety and depression. Although the mechanisms underlying post-burn pruritus remain unclear, gut microbiome dysbiosis may affect systemic inflammation and drug responsiveness. This study analyzed the gut microbiome composition of six male patients (40-50 years old) with burns and categorized them into three groups based on pruritus outcomes-non-pruritus (NP, did not receive antihistamine), responder (R, pruritus reduced with antihistamine treatment), and non-responder (NR, pruritus persisted despite antihistamine treatment). Fecal samples were collected at baseline (week 0) and after eight weeks. The NP and R groups exhibited enhanced alpha diversity, increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratios, and reduced Proteobacteria over time, indicating microbiome recovery. In contrast, the NR group exhibited inconsistent results, with case 5 demonstrating reduced diversity and increased F/B and Proteobacteria, whereas case 6 exhibited increased diversity and decreased F/B and Proteobacteria. Faecalibacterium was absent in the NR group, whereas the relative abundance of unclassified Lachnospiraceae increased. This study highlights the potential effects of dysbiosis on pruritus outcomes and drug responsiveness in patients with burns. Future studies with larger cohorts are necessary to assess these findings and explore microbiome-targeted therapies to enhance treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pruritus-a common symptom in patients with burns- impairs the quality of life and contributes to anxiety and depression. Although the mechanisms underlying post-burn pruritus remain unclear, gut microbiome dysbiosis may affect systemic inflammation and drug responsiveness. This study analyzed the gut microbiome composition of six male patients (40-50 years old) with burns and categorized them into three groups based on pruritus outcomes-non-pruritus (NP, did not receive antihistamine), responder (R, pruritus reduced with antihistamine treatment), and non-responder (NR, pruritus persisted despite antihistamine treatment). Fecal samples were collected at baseline (week 0) and after eight weeks. The NP and R groups exhibited enhanced alpha diversity, increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratios, and reduced Proteobacteria over time, indicating microbiome recovery. In contrast, the NR group exhibited inconsistent results, with case 5 demonstrating reduced diversity and increased F/B and Proteobacteria, whereas case 6 exhibited increased diversity and decreased F/B and Proteobacteria. Faecalibacterium was absent in the NR group, whereas the relative abundance of unclassified Lachnospiraceae increased. This study highlights the potential effects of dysbiosis on pruritus outcomes and drug responsiveness in patients with burns. Future studies with larger cohorts are necessary to assess these findings and explore microbiome-targeted therapies to enhance treatment outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信