COMPARISON OF STENT GEOMETRY ACHIEVED BY DIFFERENT SIDE-BRANCH BALLOONING TECHNIQUES FOR BIFURCATION PROVISIONAL STENTING: THE CRABBIS TRIAL.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Francesco Bianchini, Enrico Romagnoli, Cristina Aurigemma, Lazzaro Paraggio, Antonino Buffon, Francesco Fracassi, Mattia Lunardi, Luigi Cappannoli, Emiliano Bianchini, Andrea Zito, Carlo Trani, Francesco Burzotta
{"title":"COMPARISON OF STENT GEOMETRY ACHIEVED BY DIFFERENT SIDE-BRANCH BALLOONING TECHNIQUES FOR BIFURCATION PROVISIONAL STENTING: THE CRABBIS TRIAL.","authors":"Francesco Bianchini, Enrico Romagnoli, Cristina Aurigemma, Lazzaro Paraggio, Antonino Buffon, Francesco Fracassi, Mattia Lunardi, Luigi Cappannoli, Emiliano Bianchini, Andrea Zito, Carlo Trani, Francesco Burzotta","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"Stepwise provisional stenting\" is the most adopted approach for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in bifurcation lesions. During these procedures, side-branch (SB) may deserve treatment, but the best ballooning technique is still undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the stent configurations obtained by two SB ballooning sequences after the main vessel (MV) stent implantation: proximal-optimization-technique (POT)+kissing-balloon-inflation+final POT (PKP) versus POT+isolated-SB-dilation+final POT (PSP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 1:1 prospective, randomized, single-center trial to compare bifurcation PCI performed with either PKP or PSP in left main or large (SB diameter >2.75 mm) coronary bifurcations (NCT05559424). The achieved stent configurations (in terms of expansion, apposition and eccentricity at five different bifurcation segments) were evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the MV. The pre-defined primary study endpoint was minimum stent expansion (MSE) at the distal MV segment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI according to \"stepwise provisional stenting\" were enrolled (30 randomized to PKP and 30 to PSP). At post-intervention OCT, MSE at the distal-MV segment was significantly higher with PKP as compared with PSP (99.3±12.7% vs. 83.8±19.5%;p<0.001). Additional relevant findings included higher rate of malapposition in the bifurcation core and distal-MV with PSP and improved SB scaffolding with PKP. No significant differences in terms of stent eccentricity were noted between PSP and PKP in all the segments analyzed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the present randomized trial show that during stepwise provisional stenting in left main or large bifurcations, the PKP ballooning sequence is associated with better stent configuration compared to the PSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2025.02.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: "Stepwise provisional stenting" is the most adopted approach for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in bifurcation lesions. During these procedures, side-branch (SB) may deserve treatment, but the best ballooning technique is still undetermined.

Objectives: To compare the stent configurations obtained by two SB ballooning sequences after the main vessel (MV) stent implantation: proximal-optimization-technique (POT)+kissing-balloon-inflation+final POT (PKP) versus POT+isolated-SB-dilation+final POT (PSP).

Methods: We conducted a 1:1 prospective, randomized, single-center trial to compare bifurcation PCI performed with either PKP or PSP in left main or large (SB diameter >2.75 mm) coronary bifurcations (NCT05559424). The achieved stent configurations (in terms of expansion, apposition and eccentricity at five different bifurcation segments) were evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the MV. The pre-defined primary study endpoint was minimum stent expansion (MSE) at the distal MV segment.

Results: A total of 60 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI according to "stepwise provisional stenting" were enrolled (30 randomized to PKP and 30 to PSP). At post-intervention OCT, MSE at the distal-MV segment was significantly higher with PKP as compared with PSP (99.3±12.7% vs. 83.8±19.5%;p<0.001). Additional relevant findings included higher rate of malapposition in the bifurcation core and distal-MV with PSP and improved SB scaffolding with PKP. No significant differences in terms of stent eccentricity were noted between PSP and PKP in all the segments analyzed.

Conclusions: The results of the present randomized trial show that during stepwise provisional stenting in left main or large bifurcations, the PKP ballooning sequence is associated with better stent configuration compared to the PSP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.80%
发文量
756
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信