Alexandra Goldberg, Hans Pettersson, Cecilia Ekéus, Carina Ursing, Eva Wiberg-Itzel, Joanna Tingström
{"title":"Comparison Between Antenatal and Postnatal Colostrum From Women With and Without Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Alexandra Goldberg, Hans Pettersson, Cecilia Ekéus, Carina Ursing, Eva Wiberg-Itzel, Joanna Tingström","doi":"10.1177/08903344251318285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSupplementary feeding, colostrum or, in some countries, commercial milk formula, is given to newborns of women with Type 1 diabetes to prevent neonatal hypoglycemia. Few studies have explored the content of colostrum from women with Type 1 diabetes.Research AimsThis study aimed to investigate the macronutrients in colostrum collected during pregnancy and in the early postpartum period to compare colostrum contents in women with and without Type 1 diabetes.MethodsIn this cohort study, we collected colostrum among 20 women, 10 with and 10 without Type 1 diabetes, at 10 different time points in gestational weeks 36-40 and postpartum Days 1-5. We measured carbohydrates, protein, fat, and kilocalories in colostrum using a human milk analyzer; and we analyzed data using linear mixed models. In a follow-up analysis, we compared the content of colostrum from Day 1 with the nutritional values provided on the commercial milk formula, using a one-sample <i>t</i> test.ResultsThere were no mean differences in carbohydrates (6.6 g/100 ml; 95% CI [6.3, 6.9] vs. 6.7 g/100 ml; 95% CI [6.4, 7.0] <i>p</i> = 0.29); kilocalories (71.1 kcal/100 ml; 95% CI [62.9, 79.3] vs. 85.3 kcal/100 ml; 95% CI [77.2, 93.3] <i>p</i> = 0.21], and fat (2.7 g/100 ml; 95% CI [1.8, 3.6] vs. 2.3 g/100 ml; 95% CI [1.4, 3.2] <i>p</i> = 0.55) in colostrum when comparing women with and without Type 1 diabetes. However, antenatal protein differed at all timepoints tested (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Colostrum macronutrients on Day 1 differed from that of commercial milk formula and all other colostrum time points, except Gestational Week 38.ConclusionsOur study provides insights into antenatal and postnatal colostrum macronutrients among women with and without Type 1 diabetes. Further studies are needed to understand the effects of supplementary feeding using antenatal or postnatal colostrum or commercial milk formula on neonatal hypoglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"254-262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251318285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundSupplementary feeding, colostrum or, in some countries, commercial milk formula, is given to newborns of women with Type 1 diabetes to prevent neonatal hypoglycemia. Few studies have explored the content of colostrum from women with Type 1 diabetes.Research AimsThis study aimed to investigate the macronutrients in colostrum collected during pregnancy and in the early postpartum period to compare colostrum contents in women with and without Type 1 diabetes.MethodsIn this cohort study, we collected colostrum among 20 women, 10 with and 10 without Type 1 diabetes, at 10 different time points in gestational weeks 36-40 and postpartum Days 1-5. We measured carbohydrates, protein, fat, and kilocalories in colostrum using a human milk analyzer; and we analyzed data using linear mixed models. In a follow-up analysis, we compared the content of colostrum from Day 1 with the nutritional values provided on the commercial milk formula, using a one-sample t test.ResultsThere were no mean differences in carbohydrates (6.6 g/100 ml; 95% CI [6.3, 6.9] vs. 6.7 g/100 ml; 95% CI [6.4, 7.0] p = 0.29); kilocalories (71.1 kcal/100 ml; 95% CI [62.9, 79.3] vs. 85.3 kcal/100 ml; 95% CI [77.2, 93.3] p = 0.21], and fat (2.7 g/100 ml; 95% CI [1.8, 3.6] vs. 2.3 g/100 ml; 95% CI [1.4, 3.2] p = 0.55) in colostrum when comparing women with and without Type 1 diabetes. However, antenatal protein differed at all timepoints tested (p = 0.01). Colostrum macronutrients on Day 1 differed from that of commercial milk formula and all other colostrum time points, except Gestational Week 38.ConclusionsOur study provides insights into antenatal and postnatal colostrum macronutrients among women with and without Type 1 diabetes. Further studies are needed to understand the effects of supplementary feeding using antenatal or postnatal colostrum or commercial milk formula on neonatal hypoglycemia.
背景:为预防新生儿低血糖,对1型糖尿病妇女的新生儿给予补充喂养、初乳或在一些国家给予商业配方奶粉。很少有研究探讨1型糖尿病女性初乳的含量。研究目的本研究旨在研究怀孕期间和产后早期收集的初乳中的宏量营养素,以比较患有和非1型糖尿病妇女的初乳含量。方法在本队列研究中,我们收集了妊娠36-40周和产后1-5天10个不同时间点的20例1型糖尿病妇女的初乳,其中10例有1型糖尿病,10例无1型糖尿病。我们使用人乳分析仪测量初乳中的碳水化合物、蛋白质、脂肪和千卡;我们使用线性混合模型分析数据。在后续分析中,我们使用单样本t检验比较了第1天初乳的含量与商业配方奶提供的营养价值。结果碳水化合物含量(6.6 g/100 ml;95% CI [6.3, 6.9] vs. 6.7 g/100 ml;95% CI [6.4, 7.0] p = 0.29);千卡(71.1千卡/100毫升;95% CI [62.9, 79.3] vs. 85.3 kcal/100 ml;95%可信区间[77.2,93.3]p = 0.21),和脂肪(2.7 g / 100毫升;95% CI [1.8, 3.6] vs. 2.3 g/100 ml;95% CI [1.4, 3.2] p = 0.55),当比较患有和不患有1型糖尿病的女性时。然而,产前蛋白在所有检测时间点均存在差异(p = 0.01)。除妊娠第38周外,第1天的初乳宏量营养素与商业配方奶和其他初乳时间点不同。结论我们的研究揭示了1型糖尿病患者和非1型糖尿病患者产前和产后初乳常量营养素的变化。需要进一步的研究来了解使用产前或产后初乳或商业配方奶粉进行补充喂养对新生儿低血糖的影响。
期刊介绍:
Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are:
To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities.
To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL.
In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features:
Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy
About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue
Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe
Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue
Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications
International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.