Laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture after delivery: A comprehensive evaluation of the uterine rupture management, with a proposal surgical method.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Giovanni Pecorella, Martina Licchelli, Gaetano Panese, Andrea Morciano, Radmila Sparic, Ioannis Kosmas, Filippo De Rosa, Antonio Malvasi, Andrea Tinelli
{"title":"Laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture after delivery: A comprehensive evaluation of the uterine rupture management, with a proposal surgical method.","authors":"Giovanni Pecorella, Martina Licchelli, Gaetano Panese, Andrea Morciano, Radmila Sparic, Ioannis Kosmas, Filippo De Rosa, Antonio Malvasi, Andrea Tinelli","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uterine rupture constitutes a critical obstetric emergency that presents substantial risks to both the maternal and fetal populations. This investigation evaluated the surgical interventions available for uterine rupture, emphasizing laparoscopic repair subsequent to uterine rupture. Laparoscopic repair serves as a fertility-sustaining alternative to conventional laparotomy, demonstrating comparable operative durations of 80 min (interquartile range [IQR] 60-114) for laparoscopic procedures versus 78 min (IQR 58-114) for laparotomy interventions. Nevertheless, laparoscopic approaches confer significant advantages, including a reduced incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (14.2% vs. 40% for laparotomy), a diminished requirement for blood transfusions (14.2% vs. 60%), and abbreviated hospital stays (median of 3 days vs. 5 days for laparotomy). The investigation explored the contentious discourse surrounding single-layer versus double-layer suturing methodologies, noting that barbed sutures significantly decrease uterine closure times (224 ± 46 vs. 343 ± 75 s for traditional sutures). Single-layer suturing is advocated as sufficient for maintaining uterine integrity in suitably selected cases. The necessity of meticulous postoperative monitoring, particularly concerning the assessment of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, is emphasized, with recurrence rates varying from 4.8% to 19.4%. Finally, authors also proposed a feasible laparoscopic technique to repair a uterine rupture (the \"CHEESE\" method [closure of hemodynamically stable, early uterine rupture, via endoscopic surgery after spontaneous delivery]), appropriate for hemodynamically stable patients with minor ruptures. This review underscores the progressive role of minimally invasive techniques in the management of uterine rupture and seeks to optimize clinical outcomes for both maternal and neonatal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uterine rupture constitutes a critical obstetric emergency that presents substantial risks to both the maternal and fetal populations. This investigation evaluated the surgical interventions available for uterine rupture, emphasizing laparoscopic repair subsequent to uterine rupture. Laparoscopic repair serves as a fertility-sustaining alternative to conventional laparotomy, demonstrating comparable operative durations of 80 min (interquartile range [IQR] 60-114) for laparoscopic procedures versus 78 min (IQR 58-114) for laparotomy interventions. Nevertheless, laparoscopic approaches confer significant advantages, including a reduced incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (14.2% vs. 40% for laparotomy), a diminished requirement for blood transfusions (14.2% vs. 60%), and abbreviated hospital stays (median of 3 days vs. 5 days for laparotomy). The investigation explored the contentious discourse surrounding single-layer versus double-layer suturing methodologies, noting that barbed sutures significantly decrease uterine closure times (224 ± 46 vs. 343 ± 75 s for traditional sutures). Single-layer suturing is advocated as sufficient for maintaining uterine integrity in suitably selected cases. The necessity of meticulous postoperative monitoring, particularly concerning the assessment of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, is emphasized, with recurrence rates varying from 4.8% to 19.4%. Finally, authors also proposed a feasible laparoscopic technique to repair a uterine rupture (the "CHEESE" method [closure of hemodynamically stable, early uterine rupture, via endoscopic surgery after spontaneous delivery]), appropriate for hemodynamically stable patients with minor ruptures. This review underscores the progressive role of minimally invasive techniques in the management of uterine rupture and seeks to optimize clinical outcomes for both maternal and neonatal health.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信