Analysis of the mechanical properties of bond strength in adhesive systems bonded to HCR silicone facial.

IF 1.4 4区医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

International Journal of Artificial Organs Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1177/03913988251325680

Marcelo Coelho Goiato, Nayla Caroline Santos Yamamoto, Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto, Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva, Fernanda Pereira de Caxias, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos

{"title":"Analysis of the mechanical properties of bond strength in adhesive systems bonded to HCR silicone facial.","authors":"Marcelo Coelho Goiato, Nayla Caroline Santos Yamamoto, Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto, Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva, Fernanda Pereira de Caxias, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos","doi":"10.1177/03913988251325680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the maximum displacement resistance of silicone samples adhered to human skin using different adhesives. For this purpose, colorless silicone samples (A-4530-HCRA Silicone Gum HCR) pigmented with Functional Intrinsic II Silicone Coloring System were made and distributed into five groups (1. SA specific adhesive for maxillofacial prostheses: Drying Adhesive; 2. GHPG hair prosthesis glue; 3.GFEG semi-permanent fake eyelash glue; 4. GCLG colorless liquid glue; and 5. GDAT and denture adhesive tape). Four times were used, 30 min (T0), 240 (T1), and 480 min (T2) after the samples were adhered to the volunteer's forearm.Results: The maximum silicone displacement force was greater for the Hair Prosthesis Glue group (GHPG) in the T0 and T2 periods.Conclusion: The results show that hair glue (GHPG) would be an alternative option for use in maxillofacial prostheses and denture adhesive tape (GDAT) showed a lack of effective adhesion.","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":"275-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988251325680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the maximum displacement resistance of silicone samples adhered to human skin using different adhesives. For this purpose, colorless silicone samples (A-4530-HCRA Silicone Gum HCR) pigmented with Functional Intrinsic II Silicone Coloring System were made and distributed into five groups (1. SA specific adhesive for maxillofacial prostheses: Drying Adhesive; 2. GHPG hair prosthesis glue; 3.GFEG semi-permanent fake eyelash glue; 4. GCLG colorless liquid glue; and 5. GDAT and denture adhesive tape). Four times were used, 30 min (T0), 240 (T1), and 480 min (T2) after the samples were adhered to the volunteer's forearm.

Results: The maximum silicone displacement force was greater for the Hair Prosthesis Glue group (GHPG) in the T0 and T2 periods.

Conclusion: The results show that hair glue (GHPG) would be an alternative option for use in maxillofacial prostheses and denture adhesive tape (GDAT) showed a lack of effective adhesion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

HCR有机硅表面粘接体系粘接强度的力学性能分析。

目的：因此，本研究旨在评估不同粘接剂对硅胶样品粘附人体皮肤的最大位移抗力。为此，我们制作了用功能性本征II型有机硅着色系统着色的无色硅胶样品（A-4530-HCRA硅胶HCR），并将其分为五组(1；SA颌面修复专用胶粘剂：干燥胶；2. GHPG植发胶；3.GFEG半永久假睫毛胶；4. GCLG无色液体胶；和5。GDAT和义齿胶带)。在样品粘附到志愿者前臂后，使用了四次，分别是30分钟（T0）、240分钟（T1）和480分钟（T2）。结果：植发胶组（GHPG）在T0和T2期硅胶最大位移力更大。结论：发胶（GHPG）可作为颌面部修复的替代材料，而义齿胶带（GDAT）粘接效果较差。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.