Perceptions and Use of Germline Genetic Testing Among Patients With Prostate Cancer.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Laura B Beidler, Kimberly Zayhowski, Mary Nahorniak, Stephanie Loo, Gretchen A Gignac, Catharine Wang, Christine M Gunn
{"title":"Perceptions and Use of Germline Genetic Testing Among Patients With Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Laura B Beidler, Kimberly Zayhowski, Mary Nahorniak, Stephanie Loo, Gretchen A Gignac, Catharine Wang, Christine M Gunn","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients with prostate cancer are eligible for germline genetic testing, but it is underutilized in clinical practice. We aimed to explore perceptions of and decision making about undergoing genetic testing among patients with prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative interview study enrolled patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who had been treated at a safety-net hospital and had received a referral for genetic testing in the previous 12 months. Participants completed an interview in their native language via telephone. Data on genetic testing use were captured in interviews and via the medical record. A thematic analysis explored factors related to decision making in concert with genetic testing use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three English-speaking (n = 25), Spanish-speaking (n = 6), and Haitian Creole-speaking (n = 2) patients completed interviews. In interviews, 19 reported completing genetic testing, 10 reported no testing, and four were unsure. Medical records indicated 24 had undergone genetic testing-including six participants whose self-reported testing status was no or unsure. Four main themes identified factors that influenced participant-reported genetic testing decisions: gendered perceptions of value to family, personal utility of genetic results, preferences for information, and relative priority of testing. Many participants did not view testing as a priority and delayed or declined testing because of cancer treatment burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest opportunities to improve communication about testing purpose, value, and utility in those affected by cancer. Conversations about the utility of both the individual benefit of obtaining genetic testing for those affected by prostate cancer and implications for familial cascade testing are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400624"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many patients with prostate cancer are eligible for germline genetic testing, but it is underutilized in clinical practice. We aimed to explore perceptions of and decision making about undergoing genetic testing among patients with prostate cancer.

Methods: This qualitative interview study enrolled patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who had been treated at a safety-net hospital and had received a referral for genetic testing in the previous 12 months. Participants completed an interview in their native language via telephone. Data on genetic testing use were captured in interviews and via the medical record. A thematic analysis explored factors related to decision making in concert with genetic testing use.

Results: Thirty-three English-speaking (n = 25), Spanish-speaking (n = 6), and Haitian Creole-speaking (n = 2) patients completed interviews. In interviews, 19 reported completing genetic testing, 10 reported no testing, and four were unsure. Medical records indicated 24 had undergone genetic testing-including six participants whose self-reported testing status was no or unsure. Four main themes identified factors that influenced participant-reported genetic testing decisions: gendered perceptions of value to family, personal utility of genetic results, preferences for information, and relative priority of testing. Many participants did not view testing as a priority and delayed or declined testing because of cancer treatment burden.

Conclusion: These results suggest opportunities to improve communication about testing purpose, value, and utility in those affected by cancer. Conversations about the utility of both the individual benefit of obtaining genetic testing for those affected by prostate cancer and implications for familial cascade testing are warranted.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信