Risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies undergoing selective fetal reduction via radiofrequency ablation.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shelly Soni, Juliana S Gebb, Christina Paidas Teefey, Julie S Moldenhauer, Nahla Khalek
{"title":"Risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies undergoing selective fetal reduction via radiofrequency ablation.","authors":"Shelly Soni, Juliana S Gebb, Christina Paidas Teefey, Julie S Moldenhauer, Nahla Khalek","doi":"10.1159/000545189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To identify risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD) before 32-, 34- and 37-weeks in a cohort of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies undergoing selective fetal reduction (SFR) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center retrospective analysis of complex MCDA twin pregnancies managed with SFR via RFA between 2014-2023. Perioperative variables were compared between patients who had sPTD before and after 34 weeks and 37 weeks. We also compared variables for pregnancies that delivered before and after 32 weeks. Correlation analysis between gestational age at SFR and gestational age at delivery was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was created for time to 34 weeks grouped by different diagnostic indications and log-rank test was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study cohort, the total rate of preterm delivery was 52.0% of these 46.9% pregnancies delivering spontaneously. The rate of sPTD before 34 weeks was 27.1% and before 32 weeks was 19.4%. There was a significantly higher proportion of pregnancies undergoing RFA for the indication of TTTS that delivered before 34 weeks (43.5% vs 22.6%, p=0.01). Also, a greater number of pregnancies undergoing RFA for the indication of TTTS delivered before 37 weeks spontaneously (35.7% vs 20.9%, p=0.04). A subgroup analysis of sPTD before 32 weeks was performed. Preoperative cervical length was the only independent predictor for delivery before 32 weeks on multiple regression after controlling for confounders. Gestational age at procedure did not correlate with gestational age at delivery (p=0.78). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the proportion of pregnancies remaining undelivered from the time of RFA until 34 weeks' gestation was lower for the indication of TTTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative indication of TTTS was associated with an increased risk of sPTD before 34 and 37 weeks in the MCDA twin population undergoing RFA. In contrast, preoperative cervical length was independently associated with sPTD before 32 weeks in the same population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To identify risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD) before 32-, 34- and 37-weeks in a cohort of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies undergoing selective fetal reduction (SFR) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods: A single center retrospective analysis of complex MCDA twin pregnancies managed with SFR via RFA between 2014-2023. Perioperative variables were compared between patients who had sPTD before and after 34 weeks and 37 weeks. We also compared variables for pregnancies that delivered before and after 32 weeks. Correlation analysis between gestational age at SFR and gestational age at delivery was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was created for time to 34 weeks grouped by different diagnostic indications and log-rank test was performed.

Results: In the study cohort, the total rate of preterm delivery was 52.0% of these 46.9% pregnancies delivering spontaneously. The rate of sPTD before 34 weeks was 27.1% and before 32 weeks was 19.4%. There was a significantly higher proportion of pregnancies undergoing RFA for the indication of TTTS that delivered before 34 weeks (43.5% vs 22.6%, p=0.01). Also, a greater number of pregnancies undergoing RFA for the indication of TTTS delivered before 37 weeks spontaneously (35.7% vs 20.9%, p=0.04). A subgroup analysis of sPTD before 32 weeks was performed. Preoperative cervical length was the only independent predictor for delivery before 32 weeks on multiple regression after controlling for confounders. Gestational age at procedure did not correlate with gestational age at delivery (p=0.78). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the proportion of pregnancies remaining undelivered from the time of RFA until 34 weeks' gestation was lower for the indication of TTTS.

Conclusion: Preoperative indication of TTTS was associated with an increased risk of sPTD before 34 and 37 weeks in the MCDA twin population undergoing RFA. In contrast, preoperative cervical length was independently associated with sPTD before 32 weeks in the same population.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信