Deep learning model for the early prediction of pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Meng Lv, BinXin Zhao, Yan Mao, Yongmei Wang, Xiaohui Su, Zaixian Zhang, Jie Wu, Xueqiang Gao, Qi Wang
{"title":"Deep learning model for the early prediction of pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.","authors":"Meng Lv, BinXin Zhao, Yan Mao, Yongmei Wang, Xiaohui Su, Zaixian Zhang, Jie Wu, Xueqiang Gao, Qi Wang","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1491843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of various deep learning methods on DCE-MRI, in order to provide a simple and accessible tool for predicting pathologic response of NAC in breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we enrolled 313 breast cancer patients who had complete DCE-MRI data and underwent NAC followed by breast surgery. According to Miller-Payne criteria, the efficacy of NAC was categorized into two groups: the patients achieved grade 1-3 of Miller-Payne criteria were classified as the non-responders, while patients achieved grade 4-5 of Miller-Payne criteria were classified as responders. Multiple deep learning frameworks, including ViT, VGG16, ShuffleNet_v2, ResNet18, MobileNet_v2, MnasNet-0.5, GoogleNet, DenseNet121, and AlexNet, were used for transfer learning of the classification model. The deep learning features were obtained from the final fully connected layer of the deep learning models, with 256 features extracted based on DCE-MRI data for each patient of each deep learning model. Various machine-learning techniques, including support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), RandomForest, ExtraTrees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and multiple-layer perceptron (MLP), were employed to construct classification models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We utilized various deep learning models to extract features and subsequently constructed machine learning models. Based on the performance of different machine learning models' AUC values, we selected the classifiers with the best performance. ResNet18 exhibited superior performance, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82 - 0.91) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.96) in the train and test cohorts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using pre-treatment DCE-MRI images, our study trained multiple deep models and developed the best-performing DLR model for predicting pathologic response of NAC in breast cancer patients. This prognostic tool provides a dependable and impartial basis for effectively identifying breast cancer patients who are most likely to benefit from NAC before its initiation. At the same time, it can also identify those patients who are insensitive to NAC, allowing them to proceed directly to surgical treatment and prevent the risk of losing the opportunity for surgery due to disease progression after NAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1491843"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1491843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of various deep learning methods on DCE-MRI, in order to provide a simple and accessible tool for predicting pathologic response of NAC in breast cancer patients.
Methods: In this study, we enrolled 313 breast cancer patients who had complete DCE-MRI data and underwent NAC followed by breast surgery. According to Miller-Payne criteria, the efficacy of NAC was categorized into two groups: the patients achieved grade 1-3 of Miller-Payne criteria were classified as the non-responders, while patients achieved grade 4-5 of Miller-Payne criteria were classified as responders. Multiple deep learning frameworks, including ViT, VGG16, ShuffleNet_v2, ResNet18, MobileNet_v2, MnasNet-0.5, GoogleNet, DenseNet121, and AlexNet, were used for transfer learning of the classification model. The deep learning features were obtained from the final fully connected layer of the deep learning models, with 256 features extracted based on DCE-MRI data for each patient of each deep learning model. Various machine-learning techniques, including support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), RandomForest, ExtraTrees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and multiple-layer perceptron (MLP), were employed to construct classification models.
Results: We utilized various deep learning models to extract features and subsequently constructed machine learning models. Based on the performance of different machine learning models' AUC values, we selected the classifiers with the best performance. ResNet18 exhibited superior performance, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82 - 0.91) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.96) in the train and test cohorts, respectively.
Conclusions: Using pre-treatment DCE-MRI images, our study trained multiple deep models and developed the best-performing DLR model for predicting pathologic response of NAC in breast cancer patients. This prognostic tool provides a dependable and impartial basis for effectively identifying breast cancer patients who are most likely to benefit from NAC before its initiation. At the same time, it can also identify those patients who are insensitive to NAC, allowing them to proceed directly to surgical treatment and prevent the risk of losing the opportunity for surgery due to disease progression after NAC.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.