Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for malignant ovarian tumors mis-subclassified by the ultrasound-based ADNEX model.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1406735
Meijiao Jiang, Congcong Yuan, Siwei Lu, Yunkai Zhu, Caiting Chu, Wenhua Li
{"title":"Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for malignant ovarian tumors mis-subclassified by the ultrasound-based ADNEX model.","authors":"Meijiao Jiang, Congcong Yuan, Siwei Lu, Yunkai Zhu, Caiting Chu, Wenhua Li","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1406735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurately predicting metastatic cancer to the adnexa, stage I and advanced ovarian cancer before surgery is crucial. The ADNEX model, based on ultrasound, is currently the only prediction model that can differentiate between these types. This study aims to analyze MRI features and diagnostic value in malignant ovarian tumors mis-subclassified by the ADNEX model, considering their diverse histopathologic types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 to September 2022, 164 patients with pathologically confirmed ovarian malignancies were selected from those who were examined by ultrasound. The clinical and MRI characteristics of 51 patients mis-subclassified by the ADNEX model were compared with histopathological types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 were confirmed with primary ovarian cancer (5 with HGSOC, 14 with CCC, 2 with EC, 4 with MC, 2 with GCT, 1 with YST, 1 with immature teratoma, and 1 with dysgerminoma). There were 21 patients who had metastatic ovarian tumors (10 with colorectal cancer, 4 with gastric cancer, 2 with uterine cervical cancer, 3 with endometrial cancer, 1 with breast cancer, and 1 with LAMN). The only significant difference between the two groups was in CEA. The mean diameters of the primary and metastatic ovarian tumors were 10.29 cm (range: 3.61 cm-26.02 cm) and 8.58 cm (range: 3.10 cm-20.30 cm), respectively. A total of 42 masses were lobulated (82.35%, 42/51), and 26 masses were solid-cystic (26/51, 50.98%). There was a significant difference between CCC and other tumors, with mean ADC values of 1.01 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (range: 0.68-1.28×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s) and 0.74×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (range: 0.48-0.99×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s), respectively (P=0.000). A total of 50 masses presented isointense-T1, hyperintense-T2, and hyperintense-DWI signal on MRI (50/51,98.04%). There were 33 masses that showed intensive enhancement (33/51,64.71%). There were 17 masses who had necrosis (17/51, 33.33%), with the majority being HGSOC and ovarian metastases from colorectal and gastric cancers (12/17, 70.59%). There were 19 masses that presented hemorrhage (19/51,37.25%), with the majority being CCC (10/19, 52.63%). A total of 46 masses were diagnosed correctly by MRI (46/51,90.20%). There were 35 and 15 masses that were rated as O-RADS score 5 and score 4, respectively. One mass was rated as score 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DWI signal, ADC value, degree of enhancement, and characteristic components within the mass on MRI can provide supplementary information for malignant ovarian tumors mis-subclassified by the ADNEX model.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1406735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1406735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accurately predicting metastatic cancer to the adnexa, stage I and advanced ovarian cancer before surgery is crucial. The ADNEX model, based on ultrasound, is currently the only prediction model that can differentiate between these types. This study aims to analyze MRI features and diagnostic value in malignant ovarian tumors mis-subclassified by the ADNEX model, considering their diverse histopathologic types.

Methods: From January 2018 to September 2022, 164 patients with pathologically confirmed ovarian malignancies were selected from those who were examined by ultrasound. The clinical and MRI characteristics of 51 patients mis-subclassified by the ADNEX model were compared with histopathological types.

Results: A total of 30 were confirmed with primary ovarian cancer (5 with HGSOC, 14 with CCC, 2 with EC, 4 with MC, 2 with GCT, 1 with YST, 1 with immature teratoma, and 1 with dysgerminoma). There were 21 patients who had metastatic ovarian tumors (10 with colorectal cancer, 4 with gastric cancer, 2 with uterine cervical cancer, 3 with endometrial cancer, 1 with breast cancer, and 1 with LAMN). The only significant difference between the two groups was in CEA. The mean diameters of the primary and metastatic ovarian tumors were 10.29 cm (range: 3.61 cm-26.02 cm) and 8.58 cm (range: 3.10 cm-20.30 cm), respectively. A total of 42 masses were lobulated (82.35%, 42/51), and 26 masses were solid-cystic (26/51, 50.98%). There was a significant difference between CCC and other tumors, with mean ADC values of 1.01 × 10-3 mm2/s (range: 0.68-1.28×10-3 mm2/s) and 0.74×10-3 mm2/s (range: 0.48-0.99×10-3 mm2/s), respectively (P=0.000). A total of 50 masses presented isointense-T1, hyperintense-T2, and hyperintense-DWI signal on MRI (50/51,98.04%). There were 33 masses that showed intensive enhancement (33/51,64.71%). There were 17 masses who had necrosis (17/51, 33.33%), with the majority being HGSOC and ovarian metastases from colorectal and gastric cancers (12/17, 70.59%). There were 19 masses that presented hemorrhage (19/51,37.25%), with the majority being CCC (10/19, 52.63%). A total of 46 masses were diagnosed correctly by MRI (46/51,90.20%). There were 35 and 15 masses that were rated as O-RADS score 5 and score 4, respectively. One mass was rated as score 3.

Conclusions: DWI signal, ADC value, degree of enhancement, and characteristic components within the mass on MRI can provide supplementary information for malignant ovarian tumors mis-subclassified by the ADNEX model.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信