Utility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection combined with a protruding anchor by saline injection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors: a retrospective study in Japan.
{"title":"Utility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection combined with a protruding anchor by saline injection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors: a retrospective study in Japan.","authors":"Yoshie Nomoto, Satoshi Shinozaki, Yoshimasa Miura, Hiroyuki Osawa, Yuji Ino, Tomonori Yano, Nikolaos Lazaridis, Hironori Yamamoto","doi":"10.5946/ce.2024.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is the standard resection method for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors (SNADETs). We developed a novel UEMR technique that creates an anchor by protruding the distal fold with a saline injection (UEMR-A). The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of UEMR-A compared to conventional UEMR (UEMR-C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent UEMR for SNADETs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 patients were included and divided into UEMR-A (n=54) and UEMR-C (n=87) groups. Lesion resection was performed significantly more frequently by an expert endoscopist in the UEMR-C group compared to the UEMR-A group (p<0.001). The procedure time for UEMR-A was significantly shorter than that for UEMR-C (p=0.018), despite the additional time required for submucosal injection. The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the UEMR-A group than in the UEMR-C group (p=0.004). The horizontal margins were significantly clearer in the UEMR-A group than in the UEMR-C group (p=0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of UEMR-A was the only significant positive factor for R0 resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UEMR-A technique for SNADETs appears to improve R0 resection rates and reduce procedure times compared to the UEMR-C technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"561-568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is the standard resection method for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors (SNADETs). We developed a novel UEMR technique that creates an anchor by protruding the distal fold with a saline injection (UEMR-A). The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of UEMR-A compared to conventional UEMR (UEMR-C).
Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent UEMR for SNADETs.
Results: A total of 141 patients were included and divided into UEMR-A (n=54) and UEMR-C (n=87) groups. Lesion resection was performed significantly more frequently by an expert endoscopist in the UEMR-C group compared to the UEMR-A group (p<0.001). The procedure time for UEMR-A was significantly shorter than that for UEMR-C (p=0.018), despite the additional time required for submucosal injection. The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the UEMR-A group than in the UEMR-C group (p=0.004). The horizontal margins were significantly clearer in the UEMR-A group than in the UEMR-C group (p=0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of UEMR-A was the only significant positive factor for R0 resection.
Conclusions: The UEMR-A technique for SNADETs appears to improve R0 resection rates and reduce procedure times compared to the UEMR-C technique.