Barriers and facilitators to engagement with between-session work for low-intensity Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based interventions: a qualitative exploration of patient perceptions.

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mia Bennion, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Penny Bee
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to engagement with between-session work for low-intensity Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based interventions: a qualitative exploration of patient perceptions.","authors":"Mia Bennion, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Penny Bee","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2475168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-intensity interventions, designed as accessible, scalable, and cost-effective, are increasingly adopted globally to address common mental health problems. Typically, based on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), low-intensity interventions emphasise patient self-management techniques, practiced outside of sessions as between-session work (BSW). Although crucial for symptom improvement, task completion remains a challenge, and research on predictors of BSW engagement in low-intensity contexts is limited. This qualitative study employed interpretive description methodology and framework analysis to interview 24 patients from UK NHS Talking Therapies services, exploring barriers and facilitators to between-session engagement in low-intensity CBT-based interventions. Themes constructed emphasised the importance of prioritising BSW, where between-session activities are endorsed during sessions to cultivate favourable patient attitudes. Specific, tailored task planning, continuous practitioner review and proactive responses to non-completion were key to secure engagement. External support from patients' social networks also reinforced engagement and mitigated barriers such as time constraints. Findings highlight the need for targeted provider training to ensure consistent application of engagement-enhancing techniques, as well as adjustments to intervention delivery to better incorporate patient preferences and leverage social support. This study provides critical insights and actionable guidance that can enhance the global delivery and effectiveness of low-intensity interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2475168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-intensity interventions, designed as accessible, scalable, and cost-effective, are increasingly adopted globally to address common mental health problems. Typically, based on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), low-intensity interventions emphasise patient self-management techniques, practiced outside of sessions as between-session work (BSW). Although crucial for symptom improvement, task completion remains a challenge, and research on predictors of BSW engagement in low-intensity contexts is limited. This qualitative study employed interpretive description methodology and framework analysis to interview 24 patients from UK NHS Talking Therapies services, exploring barriers and facilitators to between-session engagement in low-intensity CBT-based interventions. Themes constructed emphasised the importance of prioritising BSW, where between-session activities are endorsed during sessions to cultivate favourable patient attitudes. Specific, tailored task planning, continuous practitioner review and proactive responses to non-completion were key to secure engagement. External support from patients' social networks also reinforced engagement and mitigated barriers such as time constraints. Findings highlight the need for targeted provider training to ensure consistent application of engagement-enhancing techniques, as well as adjustments to intervention delivery to better incorporate patient preferences and leverage social support. This study provides critical insights and actionable guidance that can enhance the global delivery and effectiveness of low-intensity interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信