Barriers and facilitators to engagement with between-session work for low-intensity Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based interventions: a qualitative exploration of patient perceptions.

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mia Bennion, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Penny Bee
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to engagement with between-session work for low-intensity Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based interventions: a qualitative exploration of patient perceptions.","authors":"Mia Bennion, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Penny Bee","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2475168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-intensity interventions, designed as accessible, scalable, and cost-effective, are increasingly adopted globally to address common mental health problems. Typically, based on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), low-intensity interventions emphasise patient self-management techniques, practiced outside of sessions as between-session work (BSW). Although crucial for symptom improvement, task completion remains a challenge, and research on predictors of BSW engagement in low-intensity contexts is limited. This qualitative study employed interpretive description methodology and framework analysis to interview 24 patients from UK NHS Talking Therapies services, exploring barriers and facilitators to between-session engagement in low-intensity CBT-based interventions. Themes constructed emphasised the importance of prioritising BSW, where between-session activities are endorsed during sessions to cultivate favourable patient attitudes. Specific, tailored task planning, continuous practitioner review and proactive responses to non-completion were key to secure engagement. External support from patients' social networks also reinforced engagement and mitigated barriers such as time constraints. Findings highlight the need for targeted provider training to ensure consistent application of engagement-enhancing techniques, as well as adjustments to intervention delivery to better incorporate patient preferences and leverage social support. This study provides critical insights and actionable guidance that can enhance the global delivery and effectiveness of low-intensity interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2475168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-intensity interventions, designed as accessible, scalable, and cost-effective, are increasingly adopted globally to address common mental health problems. Typically, based on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), low-intensity interventions emphasise patient self-management techniques, practiced outside of sessions as between-session work (BSW). Although crucial for symptom improvement, task completion remains a challenge, and research on predictors of BSW engagement in low-intensity contexts is limited. This qualitative study employed interpretive description methodology and framework analysis to interview 24 patients from UK NHS Talking Therapies services, exploring barriers and facilitators to between-session engagement in low-intensity CBT-based interventions. Themes constructed emphasised the importance of prioritising BSW, where between-session activities are endorsed during sessions to cultivate favourable patient attitudes. Specific, tailored task planning, continuous practitioner review and proactive responses to non-completion were key to secure engagement. External support from patients' social networks also reinforced engagement and mitigated barriers such as time constraints. Findings highlight the need for targeted provider training to ensure consistent application of engagement-enhancing techniques, as well as adjustments to intervention delivery to better incorporate patient preferences and leverage social support. This study provides critical insights and actionable guidance that can enhance the global delivery and effectiveness of low-intensity interventions.

基于低强度认知行为疗法(CBT)干预的间歇工作的障碍和促进因素:对患者感知的定性探索。
全球越来越多地采用可获得、可扩展和具有成本效益的低强度干预措施来解决常见的精神卫生问题。通常,基于认知行为疗法(CBT),低强度干预强调患者自我管理技术,在会话之外进行,如会话之间工作(BSW)。尽管任务完成对症状的改善至关重要,但它仍然是一个挑战,并且对低强度情境下BSW参与的预测因素的研究是有限的。本定性研究采用解释性描述方法和框架分析,采访了24名来自英国国民保健服务谈话治疗服务的患者,探索低强度cbt干预的会话间参与的障碍和促进因素。构建的主题强调了优先考虑BSW的重要性,在会议期间支持在会议期间开展活动,以培养良好的患者态度。具体的,量身定制的任务计划,持续的从业者审查和对未完成的积极反应是确保参与的关键。来自患者社会网络的外部支持也加强了参与,减轻了时间限制等障碍。研究结果强调,需要对提供者进行有针对性的培训,以确保始终如一地应用增强参与的技术,并调整干预措施的实施,以更好地结合患者的偏好并利用社会支持。这项研究提供了重要的见解和可操作的指导,可以加强低强度干预措施的全球交付和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信