Optimizing Biomarker Models for Biologically Heterogeneous Cancers: A Nested Model Approach for Lung Cancer.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Palina Woodhouse, Laurel Jackson, Michael N Kammer, Caroline M Godfrey, Sanja Antic, Yong Zou, Patrick Meyers, Susan H Gawel, Fabien Maldonado, Eric L Grogan, Gerard J Davis, Stephen A Deppen
{"title":"Optimizing Biomarker Models for Biologically Heterogeneous Cancers: A Nested Model Approach for Lung Cancer.","authors":"Palina Woodhouse, Laurel Jackson, Michael N Kammer, Caroline M Godfrey, Sanja Antic, Yong Zou, Patrick Meyers, Susan H Gawel, Fabien Maldonado, Eric L Grogan, Gerard J Davis, Stephen A Deppen","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heterogeneous biology of cancer subtypes, especially in lung cancer, poses significant challenges for biomarker development. Standard model building techniques often fall short in accurately incorporating various histologic subtypes because of their diverse biological characteristics. This study explores a nested biomarker model to address this issue, aiming to improve lung cancer early detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 337 patients from two clinical sites. Blood biomarkers were analyzed and various statistical methods employed to develop a nested model. This model was designed to account for the biological heterogeneity across histologic subtypes, compared against traditional logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient cohort included a range of malignant and benign nodules and included different cancer subtypes reflecting lung cancer heterogeneity. The nested model had comparable performance overall with the Mayo Clinic model and a standard logistic regression model with an AUC of 77.6 (95% confidence interval, 72.2-83.0) in training and 77.3 (95% confidence interval, 65.8-88.9) in testing. The nested subtype versus benign model had the best performance in the training set overall and had a particular advantage for small cell subtype prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the challenges cancer heterogeneity present for biomarker development and the potential for nested biomarker models to improve early cancer detection. Validation of this approach in larger cohorts is essential to prove its predictive benefit in biologically diverse cancers.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This work addresses the challenge of biological heterogeneity in biomarker development. A nested modeling approach may assist in developing more effective multicancer early detection strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"OF1-OF7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The heterogeneous biology of cancer subtypes, especially in lung cancer, poses significant challenges for biomarker development. Standard model building techniques often fall short in accurately incorporating various histologic subtypes because of their diverse biological characteristics. This study explores a nested biomarker model to address this issue, aiming to improve lung cancer early detection.

Methods: The study included 337 patients from two clinical sites. Blood biomarkers were analyzed and various statistical methods employed to develop a nested model. This model was designed to account for the biological heterogeneity across histologic subtypes, compared against traditional logistic regression models.

Results: The patient cohort included a range of malignant and benign nodules and included different cancer subtypes reflecting lung cancer heterogeneity. The nested model had comparable performance overall with the Mayo Clinic model and a standard logistic regression model with an AUC of 77.6 (95% confidence interval, 72.2-83.0) in training and 77.3 (95% confidence interval, 65.8-88.9) in testing. The nested subtype versus benign model had the best performance in the training set overall and had a particular advantage for small cell subtype prediction.

Conclusions: This study highlights the challenges cancer heterogeneity present for biomarker development and the potential for nested biomarker models to improve early cancer detection. Validation of this approach in larger cohorts is essential to prove its predictive benefit in biologically diverse cancers.

Impact: This work addresses the challenge of biological heterogeneity in biomarker development. A nested modeling approach may assist in developing more effective multicancer early detection strategies.

优化生物异质性癌症的生物标志物模型:肺癌的嵌套模型方法。
背景:癌症亚型的异质性生物学,特别是肺癌,对生物标志物的开发提出了重大挑战。由于不同的组织学亚型具有不同的生物学特性,标准模型构建技术往往无法准确地结合不同的组织学亚型。本研究探索了一个嵌套的生物标志物模型来解决这一问题,旨在提高肺癌的早期发现。方法:研究纳入来自两个临床站点的337例患者。对血液生物标志物进行分析,并采用各种统计方法建立嵌套模型。与传统的逻辑回归模型相比,该模型旨在解释组织学亚型之间的生物异质性。结果:患者队列包括一系列恶性和良性结节,包括不同的癌症亚型,反映了肺癌的异质性。嵌套模型的总体性能与梅奥诊所模型和标准逻辑回归模型相当,训练的AUC为77.6(95%置信区间,72.2-83.0),测试的AUC为77.3(95%置信区间,65.8-88.9)。嵌套亚型vs良性模型在整体训练集中表现最好,并且在小细胞亚型预测方面具有特殊优势。结论:本研究强调了生物标志物发展面临的癌症异质性挑战,以及嵌套生物标志物模型改善早期癌症检测的潜力。在更大的队列中验证这种方法对于证明其在生物多样性癌症中的预测效益至关重要。影响:这项工作解决了生物标志物开发中生物异质性的挑战。嵌套建模方法可能有助于开发更有效的多癌早期检测策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信