Sulfonylurea drugs for people with severe hemispheric ischemic stroke.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Linlin Fan, Jin Xu, Tao Wang, Kun Yang, Xuesong Bai, Wuyang Yang
{"title":"Sulfonylurea drugs for people with severe hemispheric ischemic stroke.","authors":"Linlin Fan, Jin Xu, Tao Wang, Kun Yang, Xuesong Bai, Wuyang Yang","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD014802.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large hemispheric infarction (LHI), caused by occlusion of the internal carotid or middle cerebral artery, is the most malignant type of supratentorial ischemic stroke. Due to severe intracranial edema, mortality fluctuates between 53% and 78%, even after the most effective medical treatment. Decompressive craniectomy can reduce mortality by approximately 17% to 36%, but the neurological outcomes are not satisfactory, and there are contraindications to surgery. Therapeutic hypothermia shows promising effects in preclinical research, but it causes many complications, and clinical studies have not confirmed its efficacy. Glibenclamide is a type of sulfonylurea. Preclinical research shows that glibenclamide can reduce mortality and brain edema and improve neurological outcomes in animal models of ischemic stroke. Sulfonylureas may be a promising treatment for individuals with LHI.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of sulfonylurea drugs in people with large hemispheric ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases, and three trials registers. We also searched gray literature sources, checked the bibliographies of included studies and relevant systematic reviews, and used Cited Reference Search in Google Scholar. The latest search date was 23 March 2024.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared sulfonylureas with placebo, hypothermia, or usual care in people with severe hemispheric ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were neurological and functional outcomes. Our secondary outcomes were death, quality of life, adverse events, and complications. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>This review includes two RCTs (N = 621): the GAMES-RP trial (glyburide advantage in malignant edema and stroke) and the CHARM trial (phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous BIIB093 (glibenclamide) for severe cerebral edema following large hemispheric infarction). Both studies compared the effects of intravenous glyburide (0.13 mg bolus intravenous injection for the first 2 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.16 mg/h for the first 6 hours and then 0.11 mg/h for the remaining 66 hours) to placebo. The GAMES-RP trial (N = 86) was conducted in 18 hospitals in the USA (mean age: intervention = 58 ± 11 years; control = 63 ± 9 years); the CHARM trial (N = 535) was conducted in 20 countries across North and South America and Eurasia (mean age: intervention = 60.5 ± 11.17 years; control = 61.6 ± 10.81 years). The overall risk of bias was high in both trials. Neither trial reported neurological outcomes. Compared with placebo, glyburide may result in little to no difference in functional outcomes, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (range 0 to 4) at 90 days (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.32; P = 0.43; 2 studies, 508 participants; low-certainty evidence), or death (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.69; P = 0.53; 2 studies, 595 participants; low-certainty evidence). Glyburide likely results in a large increased risk of hypoglycemia (RR 4.66, 95% CI 1.59 to 13.67; P = 0.005; 2 studies, 601 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. However, it probably results in little to no difference between groups in cardiac events (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.14; P = 0.17; 2 studies, 601 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), or pneumonia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.44; 1 study, 518 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference between groups in neurological deterioration within three days (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.27; 1 study, 77 participants; low-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Compared to placebo, intravenous glyburide may have little to no effect on functional outcomes, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale, or mortality. It may also have little to no effect on neurological deterioration within three days, and probably has little to no effect on cardiac events or pneumonia. However, intravenous glyburide probably results in a large increased risk of hypoglycemia. This review includes only two RCTs at overall high risk of bias. We do not have sufficient evidence to determine the effects of sulfonylureas in people with ischemic stroke. More large studies, which include more sulfonylurea drugs with different routes of administration and dosages, and different age groups with ischemic stroke, would help to reduce the current uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"3 ","pages":"CD014802"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014802.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large hemispheric infarction (LHI), caused by occlusion of the internal carotid or middle cerebral artery, is the most malignant type of supratentorial ischemic stroke. Due to severe intracranial edema, mortality fluctuates between 53% and 78%, even after the most effective medical treatment. Decompressive craniectomy can reduce mortality by approximately 17% to 36%, but the neurological outcomes are not satisfactory, and there are contraindications to surgery. Therapeutic hypothermia shows promising effects in preclinical research, but it causes many complications, and clinical studies have not confirmed its efficacy. Glibenclamide is a type of sulfonylurea. Preclinical research shows that glibenclamide can reduce mortality and brain edema and improve neurological outcomes in animal models of ischemic stroke. Sulfonylureas may be a promising treatment for individuals with LHI.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of sulfonylurea drugs in people with large hemispheric ischemic stroke.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases, and three trials registers. We also searched gray literature sources, checked the bibliographies of included studies and relevant systematic reviews, and used Cited Reference Search in Google Scholar. The latest search date was 23 March 2024.

Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared sulfonylureas with placebo, hypothermia, or usual care in people with severe hemispheric ischemic stroke.

Data collection and analysis: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were neurological and functional outcomes. Our secondary outcomes were death, quality of life, adverse events, and complications. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

Main results: This review includes two RCTs (N = 621): the GAMES-RP trial (glyburide advantage in malignant edema and stroke) and the CHARM trial (phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous BIIB093 (glibenclamide) for severe cerebral edema following large hemispheric infarction). Both studies compared the effects of intravenous glyburide (0.13 mg bolus intravenous injection for the first 2 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.16 mg/h for the first 6 hours and then 0.11 mg/h for the remaining 66 hours) to placebo. The GAMES-RP trial (N = 86) was conducted in 18 hospitals in the USA (mean age: intervention = 58 ± 11 years; control = 63 ± 9 years); the CHARM trial (N = 535) was conducted in 20 countries across North and South America and Eurasia (mean age: intervention = 60.5 ± 11.17 years; control = 61.6 ± 10.81 years). The overall risk of bias was high in both trials. Neither trial reported neurological outcomes. Compared with placebo, glyburide may result in little to no difference in functional outcomes, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (range 0 to 4) at 90 days (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.32; P = 0.43; 2 studies, 508 participants; low-certainty evidence), or death (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.69; P = 0.53; 2 studies, 595 participants; low-certainty evidence). Glyburide likely results in a large increased risk of hypoglycemia (RR 4.66, 95% CI 1.59 to 13.67; P = 0.005; 2 studies, 601 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. However, it probably results in little to no difference between groups in cardiac events (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.14; P = 0.17; 2 studies, 601 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), or pneumonia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.44; 1 study, 518 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference between groups in neurological deterioration within three days (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.27; 1 study, 77 participants; low-certainty evidence).

Authors' conclusions: Compared to placebo, intravenous glyburide may have little to no effect on functional outcomes, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale, or mortality. It may also have little to no effect on neurological deterioration within three days, and probably has little to no effect on cardiac events or pneumonia. However, intravenous glyburide probably results in a large increased risk of hypoglycemia. This review includes only two RCTs at overall high risk of bias. We do not have sufficient evidence to determine the effects of sulfonylureas in people with ischemic stroke. More large studies, which include more sulfonylurea drugs with different routes of administration and dosages, and different age groups with ischemic stroke, would help to reduce the current uncertainties.

磺脲类药物治疗严重脑半球缺血性中风。
背景:由颈内动脉或大脑中动脉闭塞引起的大半球梗死(LHI)是幕上缺血性脑卒中中最恶性的类型。由于严重的颅内水肿,即使经过最有效的治疗,死亡率也在53%至78%之间波动。减压颅骨切除术可使死亡率降低约17%至36%,但神经预后不理想,手术有禁忌症。治疗性低温在临床前研究中显示出良好的效果,但其并发症较多,临床研究尚未证实其疗效。格列本脲是磺酰脲的一种。临床前研究表明,格列本脲可以降低缺血性脑卒中动物模型的死亡率和脑水肿,改善神经系统预后。磺脲类药物对LHI患者可能是一种很有希望的治疗方法。目的:评价磺脲类药物对大面积半球缺血性脑卒中患者的治疗效果。检索方法:检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、其他5个数据库和3个试验注册库。我们还检索了灰色文献来源,检查了纳入研究的参考书目和相关的系统综述,并在谷歌Scholar中使用了引文参考检索。最近一次搜索日期是2024年3月23日。选择标准:我们纳入了将磺脲类药物与安慰剂、低温疗法或常规治疗在严重半球缺血性卒中患者中进行比较的随机对照试验(rct)。资料收集与分析:采用标准Cochrane方法。我们的主要结果是神经和功能结果。次要结局是死亡、生活质量、不良事件和并发症。我们使用GRADE来评估每个结果证据的确定性。主要结果:本综述包括两项随机对照试验(N = 621): GAMES-RP试验(格列本脲在恶性水肿和卒中中的优势)和CHARM试验(评估静脉注射BIIB093(格列本脲)治疗大面积半球梗死后严重脑水肿的有效性和安全性的3期研究)。两项研究都比较了静脉注射格列本脲(前2分钟静脉注射0.13毫克,随后前6小时静脉注射0.16毫克/小时,然后在剩下的66小时静脉注射0.11毫克/小时)与安慰剂的效果。GAMES-RP试验(N = 86)在美国18家医院进行(平均年龄:干预= 58±11岁;对照组= 63±9岁);CHARM试验(N = 535)在北美、南美和欧亚大陆的20个国家进行(平均年龄:干预= 60.5±11.17岁;对照组= 61.6±10.81岁)。在两项试验中,偏倚的总体风险都很高。两项试验均未报告神经学结果。与安慰剂相比,格列本脲在90天的功能结局方面可能导致很少或没有差异,用改进的Rankin量表(范围0至4)进行评估(风险比(RR) 1.08, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.89至1.32;P = 0.43;2项研究,508名受试者;低确定性证据)或死亡(RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 1.69;P = 0.53;2项研究,595名参与者;确定性的证据)。格列本脲可能导致低血糖的风险大幅增加(RR 4.66, 95% CI 1.59 ~ 13.67;P = 0.005;2项研究,601名受试者;中等确定性证据)与安慰剂相比。然而,这可能导致各组之间心脏事件的差异很小或没有差异(RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.47至1.14;P = 0.17;2项研究,601名受试者;中度确定性证据)或肺炎(RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 1.44;1项研究,518名参与者;中度确定性证据),并且可能导致3天内各组间神经退化的差异很小或没有差异(RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61至1.27;1项研究,77名参与者;确定性的证据)。作者的结论是:与安慰剂相比,静脉注射格列本脲可能对功能结局(用改良的兰金量表评估)或死亡率几乎没有影响。它也可能对三天内的神经退化几乎没有影响,对心脏事件或肺炎可能几乎没有影响。然而,静脉注射格列本脲可能导致低血糖的风险大大增加。本综述仅纳入两项总体偏倚风险较高的随机对照试验。我们没有足够的证据来确定磺脲类药物对缺血性中风患者的影响。更多的大型研究,包括更多的磺脲类药物,不同的给药途径和剂量,以及不同的缺血性中风年龄组,将有助于减少目前的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信