John L Adgate, Grant Erlandson, Jaime Butler-Dawson, Laura Calvimontes-Barrientos, Luis Amezquita, James Seidel, Joaquin Barnoya, Colton Castro, Magali Coyoy, Marcos Pérez, Miranda Dally, Lyndsay Krisher, Diana Jaramillo, Stephen Brindley, Lee S Newman, Joshua Schaeffer
{"title":"Airborne particulate matter exposure in male sugarcane workers at risk for chronic kidney disease in Guatemala.","authors":"John L Adgate, Grant Erlandson, Jaime Butler-Dawson, Laura Calvimontes-Barrientos, Luis Amezquita, James Seidel, Joaquin Barnoya, Colton Castro, Magali Coyoy, Marcos Pérez, Miranda Dally, Lyndsay Krisher, Diana Jaramillo, Stephen Brindley, Lee S Newman, Joshua Schaeffer","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an international epidemic of chronic kidney disease of unknown cause (CKDu) in agricultural working populations. Particulate air pollution is a likely contributing factor in populations at risk for CKDu, but there is little personal breathing zone data for these workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 1 to 3 personal breathing zone particulate matter <5 microns (PM5) gravimetric measurements in 143 male sugarcane harvesters over 2 seasons and concurrent ambient samples using personal sampling pumps and cyclone inlets as a sampling train. Due to very high concentrations observed during a pilot of these methods, personal breathing zone sampling duration was set to 4 h, beginning either at the start of a work shift (AM) or delayed for 4 h (PM). To obtain full-shift exposure concentrations we calculated 8-h time-weighted average (TWA, in µg/m3) estimates of each worker's full-shift personal breathing zone PM5 exposure concentration by averaging their individual monitored concentration with the median concentration of the unmonitored AM or PM segment from all workers that day to obtain an 8-h TWA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median full-shift personal TWA PM5 concentrations were 449 μg/m3 (range 20.5 to 1,930 μg/m3), which were much higher than ambient concentrations in these fields (median 136, range 22.5 to 2,360 μg/m3). These findings document very high personal breathing zone PM5 exposure in workers at risk for CKDu: median concentrations for all workers were 3.5 (range <1 to 33.6) times as high as concurrent ambient concentrations.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These findings suggest that ambient measurements of particulate matter are insufficient to estimate personal exposure in this population and that personal breathing zone monitoring should be used to fully explore air pollution as a risk factor for CKDu. Given that particulate matter from this source likely has multiple hazardous constituents, future research should focus on characterizing all constituents and explore associations with biomarkers of kidney injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is an international epidemic of chronic kidney disease of unknown cause (CKDu) in agricultural working populations. Particulate air pollution is a likely contributing factor in populations at risk for CKDu, but there is little personal breathing zone data for these workers.
Methods: We collected 1 to 3 personal breathing zone particulate matter <5 microns (PM5) gravimetric measurements in 143 male sugarcane harvesters over 2 seasons and concurrent ambient samples using personal sampling pumps and cyclone inlets as a sampling train. Due to very high concentrations observed during a pilot of these methods, personal breathing zone sampling duration was set to 4 h, beginning either at the start of a work shift (AM) or delayed for 4 h (PM). To obtain full-shift exposure concentrations we calculated 8-h time-weighted average (TWA, in µg/m3) estimates of each worker's full-shift personal breathing zone PM5 exposure concentration by averaging their individual monitored concentration with the median concentration of the unmonitored AM or PM segment from all workers that day to obtain an 8-h TWA.
Results: Median full-shift personal TWA PM5 concentrations were 449 μg/m3 (range 20.5 to 1,930 μg/m3), which were much higher than ambient concentrations in these fields (median 136, range 22.5 to 2,360 μg/m3). These findings document very high personal breathing zone PM5 exposure in workers at risk for CKDu: median concentrations for all workers were 3.5 (range <1 to 33.6) times as high as concurrent ambient concentrations.
Significance: These findings suggest that ambient measurements of particulate matter are insufficient to estimate personal exposure in this population and that personal breathing zone monitoring should be used to fully explore air pollution as a risk factor for CKDu. Given that particulate matter from this source likely has multiple hazardous constituents, future research should focus on characterizing all constituents and explore associations with biomarkers of kidney injury.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Annals of Work Exposures and Health is dedicated to presenting advances in exposure science supporting the recognition, quantification, and control of exposures at work, and epidemiological studies on their effects on human health and well-being. A key question we apply to submission is, "Is this paper going to help readers better understand, quantify, and control conditions at work that adversely or positively affect health and well-being?"
We are interested in high quality scientific research addressing:
the quantification of work exposures, including chemical, biological, physical, biomechanical, and psychosocial, and the elements of work organization giving rise to such exposures;
the relationship between these exposures and the acute and chronic health consequences for those exposed and their families and communities;
populations at special risk of work-related exposures including women, under-represented minorities, immigrants, and other vulnerable groups such as temporary, contingent and informal sector workers;
the effectiveness of interventions addressing exposure and risk including production technologies, work process engineering, and personal protective systems;
policies and management approaches to reduce risk and improve health and well-being among workers, their families or communities;
methodologies and mechanisms that underlie the quantification and/or control of exposure and risk.
There is heavy pressure on space in the journal, and the above interests mean that we do not usually publish papers that simply report local conditions without generalizable results. We are also unlikely to publish reports on human health and well-being without information on the work exposure characteristics giving rise to the effects. We particularly welcome contributions from scientists based in, or addressing conditions in, developing economies that fall within the above scope.