Superiority of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT over mpMRI for lateralization accuracy of diagnosing intra-glandular prostate cancer lesions: avoiding fluke targeting

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Min Wang, Zhiyong Quan, Keke Xin, Guiyu Li, Taoqi Ma, Junling Wang, Weijun Qin, Jing Wang, Fei Kang
{"title":"Superiority of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT over mpMRI for lateralization accuracy of diagnosing intra-glandular prostate cancer lesions: avoiding fluke targeting","authors":"Min Wang,&nbsp;Zhiyong Quan,&nbsp;Keke Xin,&nbsp;Guiyu Li,&nbsp;Taoqi Ma,&nbsp;Junling Wang,&nbsp;Weijun Qin,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Fei Kang","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02033-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in detecting unilateral and bilateral intra-glandular prostate cancer lesions.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 73 prostate cancer patients diagnosed via biopsy, all of whom underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI prior to surgery. Two independent readers, blinded to each other’s results and to pathology findings, evaluated the imaging modalities to make a diagnosis of unilateral (left or right) or bilateral lesions for suspected prostate lesions. Histopathological findings from a 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy and radical prostatectomy served as reference standards. The accuracy of both imaging modalities in determining unilateral and bilateral intra-glandular prostate cancer was assessed through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Additionally, factors influencing diagnostic discordance between the two modalities were evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 73 patients were included in the final analysis, comprising 34 with unilateral lesions and 39 with bilateral lesions. Among these, 35 patients underwent radical prostatectomy, revealing 22 cases of bilateral lesions and 13 cases of unilateral lesions [Kappa = 0.76 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001)]. The lateral diagnostic accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, based on pathological results from biopsy or prostatectomy, was 80.82% (59/73) and 82.86% (29/35), respectively. These values were significantly higher than those of mpMRI, which demonstrated an accuracy of 54.79% (40/73, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and 40% (14/35, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), respectively. Concordance between <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI for the lateralization accuracy was poor (kappa = 0.015, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). When both imaging modalities provided consistent lateralization results (39/73), concordance with pathological findings reached 87.18% (34/39). However, concordance with pathological results was significantly higher for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (76.47%, 26/34) compared to mpMRI (20.59%, 7/34). Further analysis revealed that an SUVmax &gt; 3.95 for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and a PI-RADS score ≥ 4 for mpMRI were independent factors influencing lateral diagnostic concordance.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher lateralization accuracy than mpMRI in intra-glandular prostate cancer. There was considerable inconsistency in the diagnostic outcomes between <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, and in cases of discordance, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was notably more accurate. SUVmax &gt; 3.95 and PI-RADS score ≥ 4 were critical factors influencing the correct lateralization accuracy when the results from <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI were inconsistent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"39 6","pages":"552 - 566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-025-02033-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in detecting unilateral and bilateral intra-glandular prostate cancer lesions.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 73 prostate cancer patients diagnosed via biopsy, all of whom underwent both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI prior to surgery. Two independent readers, blinded to each other’s results and to pathology findings, evaluated the imaging modalities to make a diagnosis of unilateral (left or right) or bilateral lesions for suspected prostate lesions. Histopathological findings from a 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy and radical prostatectomy served as reference standards. The accuracy of both imaging modalities in determining unilateral and bilateral intra-glandular prostate cancer was assessed through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Additionally, factors influencing diagnostic discordance between the two modalities were evaluated.

Results

A total of 73 patients were included in the final analysis, comprising 34 with unilateral lesions and 39 with bilateral lesions. Among these, 35 patients underwent radical prostatectomy, revealing 22 cases of bilateral lesions and 13 cases of unilateral lesions [Kappa = 0.76 (P < 0.001)]. The lateral diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, based on pathological results from biopsy or prostatectomy, was 80.82% (59/73) and 82.86% (29/35), respectively. These values were significantly higher than those of mpMRI, which demonstrated an accuracy of 54.79% (40/73, P < 0.001) and 40% (14/35, P < 0.001), respectively. Concordance between 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI for the lateralization accuracy was poor (kappa = 0.015, P < 0.05). When both imaging modalities provided consistent lateralization results (39/73), concordance with pathological findings reached 87.18% (34/39). However, concordance with pathological results was significantly higher for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (76.47%, 26/34) compared to mpMRI (20.59%, 7/34). Further analysis revealed that an SUVmax > 3.95 for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and a PI-RADS score ≥ 4 for mpMRI were independent factors influencing lateral diagnostic concordance.

Conclusion

The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher lateralization accuracy than mpMRI in intra-glandular prostate cancer. There was considerable inconsistency in the diagnostic outcomes between 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, and in cases of discordance, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was notably more accurate. SUVmax > 3.95 and PI-RADS score ≥ 4 were critical factors influencing the correct lateralization accuracy when the results from 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI were inconsistent.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT相对mpMRI在诊断腺内前列腺癌病变侧化准确性上的优势:避免吸虫靶向。
目的:比较68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT与mpMRI对单侧和双侧腺内前列腺癌病变的诊断准确性。方法:回顾性分析73例活检诊断的前列腺癌患者,术前均行68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT和mpMRI检查。两名独立的阅读者,对彼此的结果和病理结果一无所知,评估成像模式,以诊断单侧(左或右)或双侧前列腺病变。12核经直肠超声引导活检和根治性前列腺切除术的组织病理学结果作为参考标准。通过受者工作特征曲线分析,评估两种成像方式在诊断单侧和双侧腺内前列腺癌方面的准确性。此外,对影响两种诊断方式之间不一致的因素进行了评估。结果:最终纳入73例患者,其中单侧病变34例,双侧病变39例。其中35例行根治性前列腺切除术,发现双侧病变22例,单侧病变13例[Kappa = 0.76 (P 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT,活检或前列腺切除术病理结果Kappa = 0.76,分别为80.82%(59/73)和82.86%(29/35)]。mpMRI的偏侧定位精度为54.79%(40/73),而p68ga - psma -11 PET/CT和mpMRI的偏侧定位精度较差(kappa = 0.015, p68ga - psma -11 PET/CT为76.47% (26/34),mpMRI为20.59%(7/34)。进一步分析显示,68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT的SUVmax评分为3.95分,mpMRI的PI-RADS评分≥4分是影响侧位诊断一致性的独立因素。结论:68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT对腺内前列腺癌的侧位诊断准确率明显高于mpMRI。68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT与mpMRI的诊断结果有相当大的不一致,在不一致的情况下,68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT的诊断结果明显更准确。当68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT与mpMRI结果不一致时,SUVmax > 3.95和PI-RADS评分≥4是影响正确侧位准确性的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信