Use of Safety Net Enclosures as an Additional Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katinka Hummelen, Charlotte Schrama, Rob Kok
{"title":"Use of Safety Net Enclosures as an Additional Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Katinka Hummelen, Charlotte Schrama, Rob Kok","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Safety net enclosures are used in addition to (non-) pharmacological interventions in patients suffering from neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia. However, no data on effectiveness are available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective observational cohort study of 81 patients diagnosed with dementia, and admitted to a geriatric ward of a psychiatric hospital, available behavioral assessment scores were used to compare 45 patients who used safety net enclosures with 36 patients who never used safety net enclosures. Behavior was evaluated weekly using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) at admission, start of the enclosure, and before discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the intervention group had a significantly higher CMAI and NPI-Q-score. At follow-up, the intervention group showed a greater improvement in CMAI [median -13.0 (interquartile range: -27.3 to 0.05) vs 0.0 (interquartile range: -6.0 to 2.5); Mann-Whitney U = 338.5 ( P = 0.005)] compared with the comparison group. Only some NPI-Q subscales showed significantly greater improvement during the intervention than in the comparison group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our observational study is the first to present effectiveness data on Neuropsychiatric symptoms in persons suffering from dementia and suggests significantly greater improvement in CMAI scores when using safety net enclosures. However, almost no significant differences were found in other outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Safety net enclosures are used in addition to (non-) pharmacological interventions in patients suffering from neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia. However, no data on effectiveness are available.

Methods: In a prospective observational cohort study of 81 patients diagnosed with dementia, and admitted to a geriatric ward of a psychiatric hospital, available behavioral assessment scores were used to compare 45 patients who used safety net enclosures with 36 patients who never used safety net enclosures. Behavior was evaluated weekly using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) at admission, start of the enclosure, and before discharge.

Results: At baseline, the intervention group had a significantly higher CMAI and NPI-Q-score. At follow-up, the intervention group showed a greater improvement in CMAI [median -13.0 (interquartile range: -27.3 to 0.05) vs 0.0 (interquartile range: -6.0 to 2.5); Mann-Whitney U = 338.5 ( P = 0.005)] compared with the comparison group. Only some NPI-Q subscales showed significantly greater improvement during the intervention than in the comparison group.

Conclusions: Our observational study is the first to present effectiveness data on Neuropsychiatric symptoms in persons suffering from dementia and suggests significantly greater improvement in CMAI scores when using safety net enclosures. However, almost no significant differences were found in other outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信