IL-23p19 Antagonists vs Ustekinumab for Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
American Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003406
Claudia Dziegielewski, Yuhong Yuan, Christopher Ma, Brigid S Boland, John T Chang, Gaurav Syal, Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Vipul Jairath, Siddharth Singh
{"title":"IL-23p19 Antagonists vs Ustekinumab for Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Claudia Dziegielewski, Yuhong Yuan, Christopher Ma, Brigid S Boland, John T Chang, Gaurav Syal, Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Vipul Jairath, Siddharth Singh","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interleukin (IL)-23p19 antagonists with ustekinumab, stratified by prior biologic exposure, in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a systematic review through August 17, 2024, we identified phase 2 and 3 RCTs comparing IL-23p19 antagonists vs ustekinumab in adults with moderate-to-severe CD. The primary outcome was achieving clinical remission at ∼1 year, and secondary outcomes were achieving endoscopic remission and serious adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses based on prior exposure to biologic therapy, primarily tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Certainty of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5 head-to-head RCTs with a treat-through design (n = 2,506), of which 1 was conducted exclusively in patients with prior tumor necrosis factor antagonist exposure. On meta-analysis, patients treated with IL-23p19 inhibitors may be more likely to achieve clinical remission (relative risk [RR], 1.18 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.36) (low certainty of evidence) and endoscopic remission (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.07-2.20) compared with ustekinumab. On subgroup analysis, IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious than ustekinumab in patients with prior biologic exposure (clinical remission: RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.48; endoscopic remission: RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.05) (moderate to high certainty), but not in biologic-naive patients (clinical remission: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.08; endoscopic remission: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.65). IL-23p19 antagonists may be associated with a lower risk of serious adverse events as compared with ustekinumab (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious and safer than ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe CD in patients with prior biologic exposure, but not in biologic-naive patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"2260-2267"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003406","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interleukin (IL)-23p19 antagonists with ustekinumab, stratified by prior biologic exposure, in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods: Through a systematic review through August 17, 2024, we identified phase 2 and 3 RCTs comparing IL-23p19 antagonists vs ustekinumab in adults with moderate-to-severe CD. The primary outcome was achieving clinical remission at ∼1 year, and secondary outcomes were achieving endoscopic remission and serious adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses based on prior exposure to biologic therapy, primarily tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Certainty of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Results: We included 5 head-to-head RCTs with a treat-through design (n = 2,506), of which 1 was conducted exclusively in patients with prior tumor necrosis factor antagonist exposure. On meta-analysis, patients treated with IL-23p19 inhibitors may be more likely to achieve clinical remission (relative risk [RR], 1.18 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.36) (low certainty of evidence) and endoscopic remission (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.07-2.20) compared with ustekinumab. On subgroup analysis, IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious than ustekinumab in patients with prior biologic exposure (clinical remission: RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.48; endoscopic remission: RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.05) (moderate to high certainty), but not in biologic-naive patients (clinical remission: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.08; endoscopic remission: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.65). IL-23p19 antagonists may be associated with a lower risk of serious adverse events as compared with ustekinumab (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.02).

Discussion: IL-23p19 antagonists are probably more efficacious and safer than ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe CD in patients with prior biologic exposure, but not in biologic-naive patients.

治疗克罗恩病的 IL-23p19 拮抗剂与 Ustekinumab:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
背景和目的:我们对中重度克罗恩病(CD)患者中白细胞介素(IL)-23p19拮抗剂和ustekinumab的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,按既往生物暴露分层。方法:通过一项截至2024年8月17日的系统回顾,我们确定了比较IL-23p19拮抗剂和ustekinumab在中度至重度CD成人患者中的2期和3期随机对照试验。主要结局是在1年达到临床缓解,次要结局是实现内窥镜缓解和严重不良事件。我们进行了基于先前暴露于生物治疗(主要是TNF拮抗剂)的亚组分析。使用GRADE方法评价证据的确定性。结果:我们纳入了5项通过治疗设计的头对头随机对照试验(n=2506),其中一项是专门针对先前暴露于TNF拮抗剂的患者进行的。在荟萃分析中,与ustekinumab相比,接受IL-23p19抑制剂治疗的患者可能更有可能实现临床缓解(相对风险[RR], 1.18[95%可信区间[CI], 1.02-1.36])和内镜下缓解(RR, 1.53[1.07-2.20])。在亚组分析中,IL-23p19拮抗剂对于既往生物暴露的患者可能比ustekinumab更有效(临床缓解:RR, 1.31 [1.16-1.48];内镜下缓解:RR, 1.61[1.27-2.05])[中至高确定性],但在biologic-naïve患者中没有(临床缓解:RR, 0.99 [0.90-1.08];内镜下缓解:RR, 1.16[0.82-1.65])。与ustekinumab相比,IL-23p19拮抗剂可能与较低的严重不良事件风险相关(RR, 0.79[0.61-1.02])。结论:IL-23p19拮抗剂在既往生物暴露的中重度CD患者中可能比ustekinumab更有效和更安全,但在biologic-naïve患者中则不然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信