Flexible Pressure Sensors for Optimizing Pressure Garment Therapy in Periarticular Scar Treatment: Preclinical and Clinical Applications.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Jia Xu, Yaxin Xue, Wei Xu, Xin Li, Weijie Su, Jiajun Fan, Yanhong Ma, Dong Han
{"title":"Flexible Pressure Sensors for Optimizing Pressure Garment Therapy in Periarticular Scar Treatment: Preclinical and Clinical Applications.","authors":"Jia Xu, Yaxin Xue, Wei Xu, Xin Li, Weijie Su, Jiajun Fan, Yanhong Ma, Dong Han","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Pressure garment therapy is a common strategy for controlling hypertrophic scars; however, insufficient pressure due to reduced elasticity or joint movement limits its effectiveness around joints. The FlexiForce B201 pressure sensor offers precise pressure measurements, thereby demonstrating a promising solution. <b>Approach:</b> This study used a Bama pig scar model with an untreated group, a pressure garment group, and a pressure monitoring group that was treated with FlexiForce B201 sensors and pressure garments. The therapeutic effects were recorded over 1 month. The clinical research followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and was registered as ChiCTR2200064173. Eighty-two patients with peri-joint hypertrophic scars were enrolled. Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to the control group and received conventional pressure garment therapy, whereas the remaining 41 patients were included in the monitoring group. Treatment outcomes were tracked at 3 months and 6 months. <b>Results:</b> The Bama pig scar model demonstrated reduced scar hypertrophy in the monitoring group. In the clinical study, the scar thickness in the monitoring group was 47.76% of the initial thickness after 6 months, thereby representing an additional 11.33% reduction compared to the control group. The Vancouver Scar Scale score of the monitoring group (6.44 ± 1.62) was significantly better than that of the control group (7.33 ± 1.53). <b>Innovation:</b> The FlexiForce B201 pressure sensor is soft and flexible. It provides accurate pressure measurements within the pressure garment and guides physicians in adjusting the pressure distribution. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study revealed that pressure monitoring technology enhances the effectiveness of pressure garments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pressure garment therapy is a common strategy for controlling hypertrophic scars; however, insufficient pressure due to reduced elasticity or joint movement limits its effectiveness around joints. The FlexiForce B201 pressure sensor offers precise pressure measurements, thereby demonstrating a promising solution. Approach: This study used a Bama pig scar model with an untreated group, a pressure garment group, and a pressure monitoring group that was treated with FlexiForce B201 sensors and pressure garments. The therapeutic effects were recorded over 1 month. The clinical research followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and was registered as ChiCTR2200064173. Eighty-two patients with peri-joint hypertrophic scars were enrolled. Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to the control group and received conventional pressure garment therapy, whereas the remaining 41 patients were included in the monitoring group. Treatment outcomes were tracked at 3 months and 6 months. Results: The Bama pig scar model demonstrated reduced scar hypertrophy in the monitoring group. In the clinical study, the scar thickness in the monitoring group was 47.76% of the initial thickness after 6 months, thereby representing an additional 11.33% reduction compared to the control group. The Vancouver Scar Scale score of the monitoring group (6.44 ± 1.62) was significantly better than that of the control group (7.33 ± 1.53). Innovation: The FlexiForce B201 pressure sensor is soft and flexible. It provides accurate pressure measurements within the pressure garment and guides physicians in adjusting the pressure distribution. Conclusion: This study revealed that pressure monitoring technology enhances the effectiveness of pressure garments.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信