Clinical analysis of 338 cases of dacryolithiasis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ting Zhang, Wei Zhuo, Wei-Na Wang, Lu Zhao
{"title":"Clinical analysis of 338 cases of dacryolithiasis.","authors":"Ting Zhang, Wei Zhuo, Wei-Na Wang, Lu Zhao","doi":"10.17219/acem/192223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dacryolithiasis can occur anywhere in the lacrimal drainage system and is frequently associated with microbial infections. The presence of dacryolithiasis is difficult to determine based on its clinical manifestations, which complicates clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the clinical diagnosis, treatment and characteristics of dacryolithiasis, as well as surgical methods used to treat it and treatment effects over the past 5 years.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 338 patients who were diagnosed with dacryolithiasis at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients diagnosed with canaliculitis were treated with canaliculotomy. Dacryocystitis complicated by canaliculitis was treated with endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) combined with canaliculotomy. Dacryocystitis accompanied by dacryoliths was treated with En-DCR. Nasolacrimal duct stones were treated with lacrimal intubation. All patients were followed up for 6-12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent successful surgery. Of 302 cases (89.35%) with canaliculitis, 297 (98.34%) were cured with canaliculotomy; 5 cases (1.66%) recurred within 1 year after surgery and were cured with canaliculotomy again. Four cases (1.18%) of dacryocystitis complicated by canaliculitis were treated with En-DCR combined with canaliculotomy. In addition, 30 patients (8.88%) had dacryolithiasis; 28 (93.33%) of them were cured, and 2 (6.67%) with common canalicular atresia were cured after lacrimal intubation. Furthermore, 2 patients (0.59%) with nasolacrimal duct stones underwent lacrimal intubation. In addition, 62 cases (20.53%) with canaliculitis tested positive for bacteria, and the top 2 common bacteria were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus mitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Secretions are the main clinical characteristic of patients with dacryolithiasis, and surgery is the primary treatment method. In addition, different surgical methods correspond to different locations of stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/192223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dacryolithiasis can occur anywhere in the lacrimal drainage system and is frequently associated with microbial infections. The presence of dacryolithiasis is difficult to determine based on its clinical manifestations, which complicates clinical treatment.

Objectives: To analyze the clinical diagnosis, treatment and characteristics of dacryolithiasis, as well as surgical methods used to treat it and treatment effects over the past 5 years.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 338 patients who were diagnosed with dacryolithiasis at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients diagnosed with canaliculitis were treated with canaliculotomy. Dacryocystitis complicated by canaliculitis was treated with endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) combined with canaliculotomy. Dacryocystitis accompanied by dacryoliths was treated with En-DCR. Nasolacrimal duct stones were treated with lacrimal intubation. All patients were followed up for 6-12 months.

Results: All patients underwent successful surgery. Of 302 cases (89.35%) with canaliculitis, 297 (98.34%) were cured with canaliculotomy; 5 cases (1.66%) recurred within 1 year after surgery and were cured with canaliculotomy again. Four cases (1.18%) of dacryocystitis complicated by canaliculitis were treated with En-DCR combined with canaliculotomy. In addition, 30 patients (8.88%) had dacryolithiasis; 28 (93.33%) of them were cured, and 2 (6.67%) with common canalicular atresia were cured after lacrimal intubation. Furthermore, 2 patients (0.59%) with nasolacrimal duct stones underwent lacrimal intubation. In addition, 62 cases (20.53%) with canaliculitis tested positive for bacteria, and the top 2 common bacteria were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus mitis.

Conclusions: Secretions are the main clinical characteristic of patients with dacryolithiasis, and surgery is the primary treatment method. In addition, different surgical methods correspond to different locations of stones.

泪石症338例临床分析。
背景:泪石症可发生在泪道引流系统的任何部位,并常伴有微生物感染。泪石症的存在很难根据其临床表现来确定,这使临床治疗复杂化。目的:分析近5年来泪石症的临床诊断、治疗、特点、手术方法及治疗效果。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院2017年1月至2021年12月诊断为泪石症的338例患者的临床资料。诊断为小管炎的患者行小管切开术治疗。采用内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术联合小管切开术治疗泪囊炎合并小管炎。泪囊炎伴泪石用En-DCR治疗。采用泪管插管治疗鼻泪管结石。所有患者随访6 ~ 12个月。结果:所有患者均手术成功。302例小管炎患者(89.35%)行小管切开术治愈297例(98.34%);术后1年内复发5例(1.66%),再次行小管切开术治愈。采用En-DCR联合小管切开术治疗泪囊炎合并小管炎4例(1.18%)。此外,30例(8.88%)患者有泪石症;其中治愈28例(93.33%),经泪道插管后治愈2例(6.67%)。2例(0.59%)鼻泪管结石患者行泪道插管。此外,62例(20.53%)小管炎患者细菌检出阳性,常见细菌前2位为表皮葡萄球菌和密陀球菌。结论:分泌物是泪石症的主要临床特征,手术是治疗泪石症的主要方法。此外,不同的手术方法对应不同的结石位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信