Long Cheng, R J Smits, F R Dunshea, R J Dewhurst, J J Cottrell, S S Chauhan, J Luo, H Khanaki
{"title":"The use of nitrogen isotopic fractionation as a biomarker for feed conversion efficiency in pigs using blood and hair samples.","authors":"Long Cheng, R J Smits, F R Dunshea, R J Dewhurst, J J Cottrell, S S Chauhan, J Luo, H Khanaki","doi":"10.1080/10495398.2025.2473494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to 1) Establish relationships between feed conversion efficiency (FCE; live weight gain/intake) and several biomarkers in pigs using blood and hair samples, and 2) Investigate the relative FCE performance of pigs from maternal vs. terminal genetic lines fed high vs. low energy diets. 80 male pigs (Large White x Landrace) were fed for 56 days. The terminal genetic line and pigs fed the high energy diet had 5% and 15% higher FCE than the maternal genetic line and pigs fed the low energy diet, respectively. Blood nitrogen isotopic fractionation (Δ<sup>15</sup>N; animal δ<sup>15</sup>N - feed δ<sup>15</sup>N) explained 34% more variation of FCE, compared with the blood insulin‑like growth factor‑1 (IGF‑1). The turnover rate of δ<sup>15</sup>N in plasma was faster than δ<sup>15</sup>N in blood, suggesting that blood and plasma δ<sup>15</sup>N can predict long‑term versus short‑term FCE changes. Pigs fed the high energy diets showed 13% higher live weight gain, 16% greater high standard carcass weight, and 38% higher carcass backfat than those on low‑energy diets. In conclusion, Δ<sup>15</sup>N is a more effective FCE biomarker for pigs compared to IGF‑1. Hair samples were less predictive of FCE than blood‑derived biomarkers, suggesting further refinement in the methodology of harvesting hair samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":7836,"journal":{"name":"Animal Biotechnology","volume":"36 1","pages":"2473494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2025.2473494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to 1) Establish relationships between feed conversion efficiency (FCE; live weight gain/intake) and several biomarkers in pigs using blood and hair samples, and 2) Investigate the relative FCE performance of pigs from maternal vs. terminal genetic lines fed high vs. low energy diets. 80 male pigs (Large White x Landrace) were fed for 56 days. The terminal genetic line and pigs fed the high energy diet had 5% and 15% higher FCE than the maternal genetic line and pigs fed the low energy diet, respectively. Blood nitrogen isotopic fractionation (Δ15N; animal δ15N - feed δ15N) explained 34% more variation of FCE, compared with the blood insulin‑like growth factor‑1 (IGF‑1). The turnover rate of δ15N in plasma was faster than δ15N in blood, suggesting that blood and plasma δ15N can predict long‑term versus short‑term FCE changes. Pigs fed the high energy diets showed 13% higher live weight gain, 16% greater high standard carcass weight, and 38% higher carcass backfat than those on low‑energy diets. In conclusion, Δ15N is a more effective FCE biomarker for pigs compared to IGF‑1. Hair samples were less predictive of FCE than blood‑derived biomarkers, suggesting further refinement in the methodology of harvesting hair samples.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology can be defined as any technique that uses living organisms (or parts of organisms like cells, genes, proteins) to make or modify products, to improve plants, animals or microorganisms for a specific use. Animal Biotechnology publishes research on the identification and manipulation of genes and their products, stressing applications in domesticated animals. The journal publishes full-length articles and short research communications, as well as comprehensive reviews. The journal also provides a forum for regulatory or scientific issues related to cell and molecular biology applied to animal biotechnology.
Submissions on the following topics are particularly welcome:
- Applied microbiology, immunogenetics and antibiotic resistance
- Genome engineering and animal models
- Comparative genomics
- Gene editing and CRISPRs
- Reproductive biotechnologies
- Synthetic biology and design of new genomes