Social robots as conversational catalysts: Enhancing long-term human-human interaction at home

IF 26.1 1区 计算机科学 Q1 ROBOTICS
Science Robotics Pub Date : 2025-03-12
Huili Chen, Yubin Kim, Kejia Patterson, Cynthia Breazeal, Hae Won Park
{"title":"Social robots as conversational catalysts: Enhancing long-term human-human interaction at home","authors":"Huili Chen,&nbsp;Yubin Kim,&nbsp;Kejia Patterson,&nbsp;Cynthia Breazeal,&nbsp;Hae Won Park","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >The integration of social robots into family environments raises critical questions about their long-term influence on family interactions. This study explores the potential of social robots as conversational catalysts in human-human dyadic interaction, focusing on enhancing high-quality, reciprocal conversations between parents and children during dialogic coreading activities. With the increasing prevalence of social robots in homes and the recognized importance of parent-child exchanges for children’s developmental milestones, this work presents a comprehensive empirical investigation involving more than 70 parent-child dyads over a period of 1 to 2 months. We examined the effects of three robot interaction styles—a passive robot listener, an active robot with a fixed behavior strategy, and an active robot with a strategy-switching mechanism—on parent-child conversational dynamics. Our findings reveal that a robot’s active participation enhances the quality of parent-child dialogic conversations. The influence of robot facilitation varied on the basis of parental English proficiency. Strategy-switching robots provided greater benefits to non–native English–speaking families, whereas dyads with native English–speaking parents benefited more from fixed-strategy robots. Overall, this study highlights the promise of social robots that empower parents in fostering their children’s dialogic development—a contrast with the prevalent design of educational robots that primarily target children. It provides critical insights into the equitable, nuanced design of long-term family-robot interactions at home, especially in supporting diverse family backgrounds.</div>","PeriodicalId":56029,"journal":{"name":"Science Robotics","volume":"10 100","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/scirobotics.adk3307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adk3307","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of social robots into family environments raises critical questions about their long-term influence on family interactions. This study explores the potential of social robots as conversational catalysts in human-human dyadic interaction, focusing on enhancing high-quality, reciprocal conversations between parents and children during dialogic coreading activities. With the increasing prevalence of social robots in homes and the recognized importance of parent-child exchanges for children’s developmental milestones, this work presents a comprehensive empirical investigation involving more than 70 parent-child dyads over a period of 1 to 2 months. We examined the effects of three robot interaction styles—a passive robot listener, an active robot with a fixed behavior strategy, and an active robot with a strategy-switching mechanism—on parent-child conversational dynamics. Our findings reveal that a robot’s active participation enhances the quality of parent-child dialogic conversations. The influence of robot facilitation varied on the basis of parental English proficiency. Strategy-switching robots provided greater benefits to non–native English–speaking families, whereas dyads with native English–speaking parents benefited more from fixed-strategy robots. Overall, this study highlights the promise of social robots that empower parents in fostering their children’s dialogic development—a contrast with the prevalent design of educational robots that primarily target children. It provides critical insights into the equitable, nuanced design of long-term family-robot interactions at home, especially in supporting diverse family backgrounds.
作为对话催化剂的社交机器人:在家中增强长期的人际互动
将社交机器人整合到家庭环境中提出了它们对家庭互动的长期影响的关键问题。本研究探讨了社交机器人在人类二元互动中作为对话催化剂的潜力,重点是在对话式共同阅读活动中提高父母和孩子之间高质量、互惠的对话。随着社交机器人在家庭中的日益普及,以及人们认识到亲子交流对儿童发展里程碑的重要性,这项工作提出了一项全面的实证调查,涉及70多对亲子,为期1至2个月。我们研究了三种机器人交互风格——被动倾听机器人、具有固定行为策略的主动机器人和具有策略切换机制的主动机器人——对亲子对话动态的影响。我们的研究结果表明,机器人的积极参与提高了亲子对话的质量。机器人促进的影响因父母英语水平的不同而不同。策略转换机器人为非英语母语家庭提供了更大的好处,而母语为英语的父母从固定策略机器人中获益更多。总的来说,这项研究强调了社交机器人的前景,它使父母能够培养孩子的对话发展,这与主要针对儿童的教育机器人的流行设计形成鲜明对比。它为家庭中长期家庭与机器人互动的公平、细致的设计提供了重要的见解,特别是在支持不同家庭背景方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Robotics
Science Robotics Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Science Robotics publishes original, peer-reviewed, science- or engineering-based research articles that advance the field of robotics. The journal also features editor-commissioned Reviews. An international team of academic editors holds Science Robotics articles to the same high-quality standard that is the hallmark of the Science family of journals. Sub-topics include: actuators, advanced materials, artificial Intelligence, autonomous vehicles, bio-inspired design, exoskeletons, fabrication, field robotics, human-robot interaction, humanoids, industrial robotics, kinematics, machine learning, material science, medical technology, motion planning and control, micro- and nano-robotics, multi-robot control, sensors, service robotics, social and ethical issues, soft robotics, and space, planetary and undersea exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信