Sustained Casing Pressure Assessment Based on Gas Leakage Rate by the State of Equation for Real Gas

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Jieli Wang, Xuelin Dong, Deli Gao
{"title":"Sustained Casing Pressure Assessment Based on Gas Leakage Rate by the State of Equation for Real Gas","authors":"Jieli Wang,&nbsp;Xuelin Dong,&nbsp;Deli Gao","doi":"10.1002/ese3.2076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gas leakage is one of the most concerning issues in wells for exploring conventional or unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, carbon sequestration, and geothermal energy. Wellbore barriers, such as tubing, casing, and cement, are the primary components that prevent the undesirable flow of subsurface fluids. However, due to the complexity of the operating condition in a harsh environment, the tubing integrity is prone to failure, causing gas leakage and forming a sustained casing pressure (SCP) at the wellhead. This work proposes a prediction model considering the real gas effect when evaluating SCP. The proposed model involves gas flow, leakage, and accumulation in the wellbore. With the pressure and temperature obtained by the flow equations as boundaries, the model estimates the gas flow rate at the leakage point and SCP. Subsequently, comparing the current leakage model with the conventional method demonstrates the model's performance. Finally, the current model is applied to an ultra-deep well to determine the leakage location by inversion. Further sensitivity studies reveal the influences of wellbore conditions on SCP, including the production rate, depth of liquid level, and annular fluid density. The study indicates that the traditional method based on ideal gas underestimates the mass flow rate by approximately 22% compared to the current model. When the adiabatic index of the conventional method is approximated as the isentropic coefficient, the mass flow rate may agree well with the current model. It is acceptable to predict the leakage flow rate by assuming that the production gas is pure methane and ignoring the influence of gas composition. The leakage position is the most influential factor for SCP. These results would help engineers predict SCP and determine the leakage location in wells.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 3","pages":"1425-1438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gas leakage is one of the most concerning issues in wells for exploring conventional or unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, carbon sequestration, and geothermal energy. Wellbore barriers, such as tubing, casing, and cement, are the primary components that prevent the undesirable flow of subsurface fluids. However, due to the complexity of the operating condition in a harsh environment, the tubing integrity is prone to failure, causing gas leakage and forming a sustained casing pressure (SCP) at the wellhead. This work proposes a prediction model considering the real gas effect when evaluating SCP. The proposed model involves gas flow, leakage, and accumulation in the wellbore. With the pressure and temperature obtained by the flow equations as boundaries, the model estimates the gas flow rate at the leakage point and SCP. Subsequently, comparing the current leakage model with the conventional method demonstrates the model's performance. Finally, the current model is applied to an ultra-deep well to determine the leakage location by inversion. Further sensitivity studies reveal the influences of wellbore conditions on SCP, including the production rate, depth of liquid level, and annular fluid density. The study indicates that the traditional method based on ideal gas underestimates the mass flow rate by approximately 22% compared to the current model. When the adiabatic index of the conventional method is approximated as the isentropic coefficient, the mass flow rate may agree well with the current model. It is acceptable to predict the leakage flow rate by assuming that the production gas is pure methane and ignoring the influence of gas composition. The leakage position is the most influential factor for SCP. These results would help engineers predict SCP and determine the leakage location in wells.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信