Feasibility, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Transurethral Bladder Tumor Resection in an Outpatient Setting

IF 1.9 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70120
Lucas Strahl, Hendrik Borgmann, Julian Peter Struck, Johannes Salem, Timur H. Kuru
{"title":"Feasibility, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Transurethral Bladder Tumor Resection in an Outpatient Setting","authors":"Lucas Strahl,&nbsp;Hendrik Borgmann,&nbsp;Julian Peter Struck,&nbsp;Johannes Salem,&nbsp;Timur H. Kuru","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) is a common urological procedure, typically performed in an inpatient setting. This study aims to investigate safety, quality, and patient satisfaction aspects of TURB in an outpatient setting, reflecting the emerging strategy of outpatientization of surgical procedures in the German healthcare system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 100 patients who underwent outpatient TURB. The standard procedure was day surgery under general anesthesia and dismissal with or without a urinary catheter. The analysis focused on postoperative complications, resection quality, recurrence within 6 months, and patient satisfaction. Data was collected from electronic medical records and patient interviews and analyzed using descriptive and multivariate statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The cohort consisted primarily of male patients (79%) with a median age of 70 years. The average surgery time was 11.3 min with a mean of 1.6 tumors resected. Histopathological findings leaned toward superficial bladder tumors with a mean recurrence rate of 11.6%. Postoperative complications were mostly mild, with only 5% of patients suffering from complications rated as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2 and no complications of grade ≥ 4. High levels of patient satisfaction were reported, with 83% preferring outpatient TURB to inpatient treatment for future surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Outpatient TURB appears to be a safe and effective alternative to inpatient surgery for selected patients with bladder tumors ≤ 4 cm, offering comparable surgical and oncological outcomes while enhancing patient satisfaction and reducing healthcare system burden.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.70120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) is a common urological procedure, typically performed in an inpatient setting. This study aims to investigate safety, quality, and patient satisfaction aspects of TURB in an outpatient setting, reflecting the emerging strategy of outpatientization of surgical procedures in the German healthcare system.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 100 patients who underwent outpatient TURB. The standard procedure was day surgery under general anesthesia and dismissal with or without a urinary catheter. The analysis focused on postoperative complications, resection quality, recurrence within 6 months, and patient satisfaction. Data was collected from electronic medical records and patient interviews and analyzed using descriptive and multivariate statistics.

Results

The cohort consisted primarily of male patients (79%) with a median age of 70 years. The average surgery time was 11.3 min with a mean of 1.6 tumors resected. Histopathological findings leaned toward superficial bladder tumors with a mean recurrence rate of 11.6%. Postoperative complications were mostly mild, with only 5% of patients suffering from complications rated as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2 and no complications of grade ≥ 4. High levels of patient satisfaction were reported, with 83% preferring outpatient TURB to inpatient treatment for future surgery.

Conclusion

Outpatient TURB appears to be a safe and effective alternative to inpatient surgery for selected patients with bladder tumors ≤ 4 cm, offering comparable surgical and oncological outcomes while enhancing patient satisfaction and reducing healthcare system burden.

Abstract Image

经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术在门诊的可行性、安全性和患者满意度
经尿道膀胱切除术(TURB)是一种常见的泌尿外科手术,通常在住院患者中进行。本研究旨在调查TURB在门诊环境中的安全性、质量和患者满意度,反映了德国医疗保健系统中外科手术门诊化的新兴策略。方法回顾性分析100例门诊TURB患者。标准程序是全麻下的日间手术,有或没有导尿。重点分析术后并发症、切除质量、6个月内复发率和患者满意度。从电子病历和患者访谈中收集数据,并使用描述性和多变量统计进行分析。结果该队列主要由男性患者(79%)组成,中位年龄为70岁。平均手术时间11.3 min,平均切除肿瘤1.6个。组织病理学结果倾向于浅表性膀胱肿瘤,平均复发率为11.6%。术后并发症多为轻度,仅有5%的患者出现并发症,Clavien-Dindo评分≥2级,无并发症≥4级。据报道,患者满意度很高,83%的患者更倾向于门诊TURB治疗,而不是住院治疗。结论对于膀胱肿瘤≤4 cm的患者,门诊TURB是一种安全有效的替代住院手术的方法,可提供相当的手术和肿瘤结果,同时提高患者满意度,减轻医疗系统负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信