Illness risk representations underlying women's breast cancer risk appraisals: A theory-informed qualitative analysis

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Victoria G. Woof, Lorna McWilliams, D. Gareth Evans, Anthony Howell, David P. French
{"title":"Illness risk representations underlying women's breast cancer risk appraisals: A theory-informed qualitative analysis","authors":"Victoria G. Woof,&nbsp;Lorna McWilliams,&nbsp;D. Gareth Evans,&nbsp;Anthony Howell,&nbsp;David P. French","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study assessed the utility of Cameron's Illness Risk Representation (IRR) framework in understanding how women interpret their breast cancer risk after receiving a clinically derived estimate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary qualitative analysis of two studies within the BC-Predict trial, using semi-structured telephone interviews with women aged 47–74 who received breast cancer risk estimates via population screening.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-eight women were informed of their 10-year breast cancer risk (low (&lt;1.5% risk), average (1.5–4.99%), above-average (moderate; 5–7.99%) and high (≥8%)). Moderate- and high-risk women were eligible for enhanced preventive management. Women were interviewed about their risk, with data analysed using a thematic framework approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Causal representations of breast cancer were often incomplete, with women primarily relying on family history and health-related behaviours to understand their risk. This reliance shaped pre-existing expectations and led to uncertainty about unfamiliar risk factors. As women aged, concerns about breast cancer susceptibility became more prominent. Emotional reactions to risk communication, along with the physical implications of risk management strategies, were also considered. Women were knowledgeable about early detection and prevention strategies, showing agency in reducing risk and preventing aggressive cancers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The IRR framework largely explained women's breast cancer risk appraisals but adaptations could enhance its applicability. The identity construct could be redefined and combined with the causal construct. The framework should also consider the extent to which pre-existing appraisals change after receiving a clinical-derived risk estimate. Healthcare professionals should assess women's knowledge before communicating personal risk estimates to reduce doubt and the impact of unfamiliar information.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12792","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study assessed the utility of Cameron's Illness Risk Representation (IRR) framework in understanding how women interpret their breast cancer risk after receiving a clinically derived estimate.

Design

Secondary qualitative analysis of two studies within the BC-Predict trial, using semi-structured telephone interviews with women aged 47–74 who received breast cancer risk estimates via population screening.

Methods

Forty-eight women were informed of their 10-year breast cancer risk (low (<1.5% risk), average (1.5–4.99%), above-average (moderate; 5–7.99%) and high (≥8%)). Moderate- and high-risk women were eligible for enhanced preventive management. Women were interviewed about their risk, with data analysed using a thematic framework approach.

Results

Causal representations of breast cancer were often incomplete, with women primarily relying on family history and health-related behaviours to understand their risk. This reliance shaped pre-existing expectations and led to uncertainty about unfamiliar risk factors. As women aged, concerns about breast cancer susceptibility became more prominent. Emotional reactions to risk communication, along with the physical implications of risk management strategies, were also considered. Women were knowledgeable about early detection and prevention strategies, showing agency in reducing risk and preventing aggressive cancers.

Conclusions

The IRR framework largely explained women's breast cancer risk appraisals but adaptations could enhance its applicability. The identity construct could be redefined and combined with the causal construct. The framework should also consider the extent to which pre-existing appraisals change after receiving a clinical-derived risk estimate. Healthcare professionals should assess women's knowledge before communicating personal risk estimates to reduce doubt and the impact of unfamiliar information.

Abstract Image

目标 本研究评估了卡梅伦疾病风险表征(IRR)框架在了解女性在接受临床评估后如何解释其乳腺癌风险方面的实用性。 设计 对 BC-Predict 试验中的两项研究进行二次定性分析,采用半结构化电话采访的方式,采访对象为通过人群筛查获得乳腺癌风险估计值的 47-74 岁女性。 方法 48 名妇女被告知其 10 年乳腺癌风险(低风险(1.5%)、平均风险(1.5-4.99%)、高于平均风险(中度风险;5-7.99%)和高风险(≥8%))。中度和高风险妇女有资格接受强化预防管理。对妇女进行了有关其风险的访谈,并采用主题框架法对数据进行了分析。 结果 关于乳腺癌的因果关系表述往往不完整,妇女主要依靠家族病史和与健康相关的行为来了解自己的风险。这种依赖形成了原有的预期,并导致对陌生风险因素的不确定性。随着年龄的增长,妇女对乳腺癌易感性的担忧变得更加突出。对风险交流的情绪反应以及风险管理战略对身体的影响也被考虑在内。女性对早期检测和预防策略很了解,在降低风险和预防侵袭性癌症方面表现出了积极性。 结论 IRR 框架在很大程度上解释了妇女对乳腺癌风险的评估,但对其进行调整可以提高其适用性。身份结构可以重新定义,并与因果结构相结合。该框架还应考虑在接受临床风险评估后,原有评估会在多大程度上发生改变。医疗保健专业人员应在告知个人风险估计值之前评估妇女的知识,以减少怀疑和陌生信息的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信