Using the Andersen Behavioural Model to explore formal support use among older informal carers in Finland and Sweden

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Sarah Åkerman, Fredrica Nyqvist, Minna Zechner, Mikael Nygård, Birgitta Olofsson
{"title":"Using the Andersen Behavioural Model to explore formal support use among older informal carers in Finland and Sweden","authors":"Sarah Åkerman,&nbsp;Fredrica Nyqvist,&nbsp;Minna Zechner,&nbsp;Mikael Nygård,&nbsp;Birgitta Olofsson","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This comparative study employs the Andersen Behavioural Model to investigate the role of predisposing, enabling and need factors for formal support use among older informal carers in Finland and Sweden. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Gerontological Regional Database (GERDA) survey data from 2021/2022, and 1167 informal carers were included. Living in Finland, lack of financial strain, non-governmental organisation membership, providing care in one's household, providing care daily, caring for someone with cognitive decline, and helping with personal hygiene increased the likelihood of using formal support, while using the internet independently decreased it. The results partly reflect supported familialism, where, especially in Finland, the care recipients' objective care needs were the strongest predictors of informal carers' formal support use. Simultaneously, informal carers' subjective needs were not associated with formal support use. This is especially alarming in Finland given the explicit policy aim of supporting and integrating informal carers into formal care for older adults. Income-related care fees might tentatively explain why formal support was related to financial strain but not personal income and educational level. More research is warranted on the role of income, especially at the household level. Enabling resources, assessed here as NGO membership and independent internet use, also influenced formal support use. These findings motivate the use of the multicomponent Andersen Behavioral Model theoretical framework when investigating inequalities in Nordic care. All in all, the results suggest that, despite differences between the countries, current familialistic policy shifts in both Finland and Sweden fail to ensure universal social rights for informal carers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comparative study employs the Andersen Behavioural Model to investigate the role of predisposing, enabling and need factors for formal support use among older informal carers in Finland and Sweden. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the Gerontological Regional Database (GERDA) survey data from 2021/2022, and 1167 informal carers were included. Living in Finland, lack of financial strain, non-governmental organisation membership, providing care in one's household, providing care daily, caring for someone with cognitive decline, and helping with personal hygiene increased the likelihood of using formal support, while using the internet independently decreased it. The results partly reflect supported familialism, where, especially in Finland, the care recipients' objective care needs were the strongest predictors of informal carers' formal support use. Simultaneously, informal carers' subjective needs were not associated with formal support use. This is especially alarming in Finland given the explicit policy aim of supporting and integrating informal carers into formal care for older adults. Income-related care fees might tentatively explain why formal support was related to financial strain but not personal income and educational level. More research is warranted on the role of income, especially at the household level. Enabling resources, assessed here as NGO membership and independent internet use, also influenced formal support use. These findings motivate the use of the multicomponent Andersen Behavioral Model theoretical framework when investigating inequalities in Nordic care. All in all, the results suggest that, despite differences between the countries, current familialistic policy shifts in both Finland and Sweden fail to ensure universal social rights for informal carers.

使用安徒生行为模型探索芬兰和瑞典老年非正式照顾者的正式支持使用情况
本比较研究采用安徒生行为模型来调查芬兰和瑞典老年非正式照顾者使用正式支持的易感因素、使能因素和需求因素的作用。使用GERDA (gerontology Regional Database) 2021/2022年的调查数据进行多元logistic回归分析,纳入1167名非正规护理人员。生活在芬兰,缺乏经济压力,非政府组织成员,在家中提供护理,提供日常护理,照顾认知能力下降的人,帮助保持个人卫生,增加了使用正式支持的可能性,而独立使用互联网则降低了这种可能性。结果部分反映了支持的熟悉性,其中,特别是在芬兰,护理对象的客观护理需求是非正式护理人员使用正式支持的最强预测因子。同时,非正式照顾者的主观需求与正式支持的使用无关。考虑到芬兰明确的政策目标是支持非正式护理人员并将其纳入对老年人的正式护理,这种情况在芬兰尤其令人担忧。与收入相关的护理费用可以初步解释为什么正式支持与经济压力有关,而与个人收入和教育水平无关。有必要对收入的作用,特别是在家庭一级的作用进行更多的研究。有利资源(在此评估为非政府组织成员资格和独立使用互联网)也影响了正式支助的使用。这些发现激发了在调查北欧护理不平等时使用多成分安德森行为模型理论框架。总而言之,结果表明,尽管两国之间存在差异,但芬兰和瑞典目前的家庭政策转变都未能确保非正式照顾者的普遍社会权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信