Gender Composition of Invited Speakers and Session Chairs at American Society for Apheresis Annual Meetings Between 2019 and 2024

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Jeremy W. Jacobs, Elizabeth S. Allen, Laura D. Stephens, Brian D. Adkins, Jennifer S. Woo, Allison P. Wheeler, Deva Sharma, Yvette M. Miller, Garrett S. Booth
{"title":"Gender Composition of Invited Speakers and Session Chairs at American Society for Apheresis Annual Meetings Between 2019 and 2024","authors":"Jeremy W. Jacobs,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Allen,&nbsp;Laura D. Stephens,&nbsp;Brian D. Adkins,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Woo,&nbsp;Allison P. Wheeler,&nbsp;Deva Sharma,&nbsp;Yvette M. Miller,&nbsp;Garrett S. Booth","doi":"10.1002/jca.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disparities persist throughout medicine, including among conference speakership invitations. The National Institutes of Health have highlighted the importance of diversity at academic conferences. We assessed the gender composition of speakers at the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) annual meeting. We assessed all session chairs and speakers at the annual ASFA meeting from 2019 to 2024. Two authors independently assessed individuals' genders. The primary outcome was the gender composition of all session chairs and speakers by position. Subset analyzes were performed to assess the gender composition of unique individuals (i.e., examining the total number of unique men and women, independent of the number of sessions at which they spoke) and by professional degree. 820 positions (665 speaker positions and 155 chair positions) were identified; women comprised significantly more positions than men [64.3%, 528/820 (95% CI 61.1%–67.6%) vs. 35.6% 292/820 (32.4%–38.9%); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001]. 52.7% (432/820) of all session positions were held by physicians, with no significant difference in the gender composition [women 47.5%, 205/432 (42.8%–52.2%) vs. men 52.6%, 227/432 (47.8%–57.2%); <i>p</i> = 0.31]. When limited to unique physician individuals, women were significantly outnumbered by men [40.1%, 71/177 (33.2%–47.5%) vs. 59.9%, 106/177 (52.5%–66.8%); <i>p</i> = 0.01]. This analysis demonstrated mixed findings, with more women across all positions overall but significantly more men when limited to unique physicians. Diversity in conference positions begets a broader array of perspectives, knowledge, and expertise, and can aid in realizing greater diversity in related areas. Thus, academic conference diversity should be prioritized and thoughtfully pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disparities persist throughout medicine, including among conference speakership invitations. The National Institutes of Health have highlighted the importance of diversity at academic conferences. We assessed the gender composition of speakers at the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) annual meeting. We assessed all session chairs and speakers at the annual ASFA meeting from 2019 to 2024. Two authors independently assessed individuals' genders. The primary outcome was the gender composition of all session chairs and speakers by position. Subset analyzes were performed to assess the gender composition of unique individuals (i.e., examining the total number of unique men and women, independent of the number of sessions at which they spoke) and by professional degree. 820 positions (665 speaker positions and 155 chair positions) were identified; women comprised significantly more positions than men [64.3%, 528/820 (95% CI 61.1%–67.6%) vs. 35.6% 292/820 (32.4%–38.9%); p < 0.0001]. 52.7% (432/820) of all session positions were held by physicians, with no significant difference in the gender composition [women 47.5%, 205/432 (42.8%–52.2%) vs. men 52.6%, 227/432 (47.8%–57.2%); p = 0.31]. When limited to unique physician individuals, women were significantly outnumbered by men [40.1%, 71/177 (33.2%–47.5%) vs. 59.9%, 106/177 (52.5%–66.8%); p = 0.01]. This analysis demonstrated mixed findings, with more women across all positions overall but significantly more men when limited to unique physicians. Diversity in conference positions begets a broader array of perspectives, knowledge, and expertise, and can aid in realizing greater diversity in related areas. Thus, academic conference diversity should be prioritized and thoughtfully pursued.

Abstract Image

2019年至2024年美国血液学会年会特邀演讲者和会议主席的性别构成
在整个医学领域,包括在会议演讲邀请中,差异依然存在。美国国立卫生研究院在学术会议上强调了多样性的重要性。我们评估了在美国独立学会(ASFA)年会上发言的性别构成。我们对2019年至2024年ASFA年会的所有会议主席和演讲者进行了评估。两位作者独立评估了个体的性别。主要结果是按职位划分的所有会议主席和发言人的性别构成。进行了子集分析,以评估独特个体的性别构成(即,检查独特男性和女性的总数,与他们发言的会议次数无关)和专业学位。确定了820个职位(演讲者职位665个,主席职位155个);女性占职位的比例明显高于男性[64.3%,528/820 (95% CI 61.1%-67.6%) vs. 35.6%, 292/820 (32.4%-38.9%);p < 0.0001]。52.7%(432/820)的会议职位由医生担任,性别构成无显著差异[女性47.5%,205/432 (42.8%-52.2%)vs男性52.6%,227/432 (47.8%-57.2%);p = 0.31]。当局限于独特的医生个体时,女性明显多于男性[40.1%,71/177(33.2%-47.5%)比59.9%,106/177 (52.5%-66.8%);p = 0.01]。这项分析显示了不同的结果,在所有职位中,女性总体上更多,但在特定的医生中,男性明显更多。会议职位的多样性产生了更广泛的观点、知识和专业知识,并有助于在相关领域实现更大的多样性。因此,学术会议的多样性应该得到优先考虑和深思熟虑的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信