Modified Conditional Borrowing-By-Part Power Prior for Dynamic and Parameter-Specific Information Borrowing of the Gaussian Endpoint

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Kai Wang, Han Cao, Chen Yao
{"title":"Modified Conditional Borrowing-By-Part Power Prior for Dynamic and Parameter-Specific Information Borrowing of the Gaussian Endpoint","authors":"Kai Wang,&nbsp;Han Cao,&nbsp;Chen Yao","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Borrowing external controls to augment the concurrent control arm is a popular topic in clinical trials. Bayesian dynamic borrowing methods adaptively discount external controls according to prior-data conflict. For the Gaussian endpoint, parameter-specific information borrowing enables differential discounting between the population mean and variance. The borrowing-by-part power prior employs two power parameters to separately downweight external likelihoods concerning the sample mean and variance. However, within the fully Bayesian framework, the posterior inference of the average treatment effect (ATE) defined as the population mean difference is significantly affected by the variance-specific prior-data conflict that reflects the heterogeneity of population variance. Here, we propose the modified conditional borrowing-by-part power prior (MCBPP) that separately discounts the external sample mean and variance according to parameter-specific prior-data conflicts, resulting in a more stable posterior estimation of ATE than its competitors under the same degree of mean-specific prior-data conflict. By fully discounting the external sample variance, the robust MCBPP (rMCBPP) can yield robust posterior inference of ATE against the variance-specific prior-data conflict. Although the population variance is considered a nuisance parameter, its homogeneity is equally important to justify information borrowing. We recommend the rMCBPP for borrowing external controls with a similar sample variance to concurrent controls because it exhibits better control of bias and Type I error rate than the modified power prior (MPP) assuming unknown variance in the absence of population variance heterogeneity. However, when faced with a significant sample variance discrepancy, the MPP assuming unknown variance is preferred given its better performance under severe population variance heterogeneity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borrowing external controls to augment the concurrent control arm is a popular topic in clinical trials. Bayesian dynamic borrowing methods adaptively discount external controls according to prior-data conflict. For the Gaussian endpoint, parameter-specific information borrowing enables differential discounting between the population mean and variance. The borrowing-by-part power prior employs two power parameters to separately downweight external likelihoods concerning the sample mean and variance. However, within the fully Bayesian framework, the posterior inference of the average treatment effect (ATE) defined as the population mean difference is significantly affected by the variance-specific prior-data conflict that reflects the heterogeneity of population variance. Here, we propose the modified conditional borrowing-by-part power prior (MCBPP) that separately discounts the external sample mean and variance according to parameter-specific prior-data conflicts, resulting in a more stable posterior estimation of ATE than its competitors under the same degree of mean-specific prior-data conflict. By fully discounting the external sample variance, the robust MCBPP (rMCBPP) can yield robust posterior inference of ATE against the variance-specific prior-data conflict. Although the population variance is considered a nuisance parameter, its homogeneity is equally important to justify information borrowing. We recommend the rMCBPP for borrowing external controls with a similar sample variance to concurrent controls because it exhibits better control of bias and Type I error rate than the modified power prior (MPP) assuming unknown variance in the absence of population variance heterogeneity. However, when faced with a significant sample variance discrepancy, the MPP assuming unknown variance is preferred given its better performance under severe population variance heterogeneity.

高斯端点动态和特定参数信息借用的改进条件分段借用幂先验
借用外部控制来增加并发控制臂是临床试验中的一个热门话题。贝叶斯动态借用方法根据先验数据冲突自适应地对外部控制进行贴现。对于高斯端点,特定参数的信息借用使总体均值和方差之间的微分折现成为可能。逐次幂先验采用两个幂参数分别降权关于样本均值和方差的外部似然。然而,在完全贝叶斯框架内,定义为总体平均差异的平均治疗效果(ATE)的后验推断受到方差特异性先验数据冲突的显著影响,这反映了总体方差的异质性。在此,我们提出了改进的条件逐次借款功率先验(conditional borrowing-by-part power prior, MCBPP),该方法根据参数特定的先验数据冲突分别对外部样本均值和方差进行贴现,从而在相同程度的均值特定先验数据冲突下,获得了比竞争对手更稳定的ATE后验估计。通过充分贴现外部样本方差,稳健MCBPP (rMCBPP)可以针对方差特异性先验数据冲突产生稳健的ATE后验推断。尽管总体方差被认为是一个令人讨厌的参数,但它的同质性对于证明信息借用的合理性同样重要。我们推荐rMCBPP采用与并发控制相似的样本方差的外部控制,因为它比假设未知方差的修正功率先验(MPP)在没有总体方差异质性的情况下表现出更好的偏差和I型错误率控制。然而,当面对显著的样本方差差异时,假设未知方差的MPP在严重的总体方差异质性下表现更好,因此更受青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信