Neuropsychological tests and machine learning: identifying predictors of MCI and dementia progression

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Carlotta Cazzolli, Marco Chierici, Monica Dallabona, Chiara Guella, Giuseppe Jurman
{"title":"Neuropsychological tests and machine learning: identifying predictors of MCI and dementia progression","authors":"Carlotta Cazzolli,&nbsp;Marco Chierici,&nbsp;Monica Dallabona,&nbsp;Chiara Guella,&nbsp;Giuseppe Jurman","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-02962-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early prediction of progression in dementia is of major importance for providing patients with adequate clinical care, with considerable impact on the organization of the whole healthcare system.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>The main task is tailoring robust and consolidated machine learning models to detect which neuropsychological tests are more effective in predicting a patient’s mental status. In a translational medicine perspective, such identification tool should find its place in the clinician’s toolbox as a support throughout his daily diagnostic routine. A second objective involves predicting the patient’s diagnosis based on the results of the cognitive assessment.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>281 patients with MCI or dementia diagnosis were assessed through 14 commonly administered neuropsychological tests designed to evaluate different cognitive domains. A suite of machine learning models, trained on different subsets of data, was used to detect the most informative tests and to predict the patient’s diagnosis. Two external validation datasets containing MMSE and FAB tests were involved in this second task.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The tests qualitatively and statistically associated to a cognitive decline are MMSE, FAB, BSTR, AM, and VSF, of which at least three were considered the most informative also by machine learning. 73% average accuracy was obtained in the diagnosis prediction on three subsets of original and external data.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Detecting the most informative tests could reduce the visits’ time and prevent the cognitive assessment from being biased by external factors. Machine learning models’ prediction represents a useful baseline for the clinician’s actual diagnosis and a reliable insight into the future development of the patient’s cognitive status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-02962-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-02962-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early prediction of progression in dementia is of major importance for providing patients with adequate clinical care, with considerable impact on the organization of the whole healthcare system.

Aims

The main task is tailoring robust and consolidated machine learning models to detect which neuropsychological tests are more effective in predicting a patient’s mental status. In a translational medicine perspective, such identification tool should find its place in the clinician’s toolbox as a support throughout his daily diagnostic routine. A second objective involves predicting the patient’s diagnosis based on the results of the cognitive assessment.

Methods

281 patients with MCI or dementia diagnosis were assessed through 14 commonly administered neuropsychological tests designed to evaluate different cognitive domains. A suite of machine learning models, trained on different subsets of data, was used to detect the most informative tests and to predict the patient’s diagnosis. Two external validation datasets containing MMSE and FAB tests were involved in this second task.

Results

The tests qualitatively and statistically associated to a cognitive decline are MMSE, FAB, BSTR, AM, and VSF, of which at least three were considered the most informative also by machine learning. 73% average accuracy was obtained in the diagnosis prediction on three subsets of original and external data.

Discussion

Detecting the most informative tests could reduce the visits’ time and prevent the cognitive assessment from being biased by external factors. Machine learning models’ prediction represents a useful baseline for the clinician’s actual diagnosis and a reliable insight into the future development of the patient’s cognitive status.

神经心理测试和机器学习:识别轻度认知障碍和痴呆进展的预测因素
背景:准确预测痴呆症的进展对于为患者提供充分的临床护理具有重要意义,对整个医疗保健系统的组织具有相当大的影响。主要任务是定制健壮且统一的机器学习模型,以检测哪种神经心理测试更有效地预测患者的精神状态。从转化医学的角度来看,这种识别工具应该在临床医生的工具箱中找到它的位置,作为他日常诊断程序的支持。第二个目标是根据认知评估的结果预测病人的诊断。方法对281例轻度认知障碍或痴呆患者进行14项常用的神经心理学测试,以评估不同的认知领域。一套机器学习模型,在不同的数据子集上训练,用于检测最具信息量的测试并预测患者的诊断。第二个任务涉及两个包含MMSE和FAB测试的外部验证数据集。结果与认知能力下降定性和统计学相关的测试是MMSE、FAB、BSTR、AM和VSF,其中至少有三项被认为是机器学习最具信息量的。在原始数据和外部数据的三个子集上的诊断预测平均准确率达到73%。讨论发现信息量最大的测试可以减少就诊时间,防止认知评估受外部因素的影响。机器学习模型的预测为临床医生的实际诊断提供了有用的基线,并为患者认知状态的未来发展提供了可靠的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信