Fluid and lithology discrimination using integrated facies, petrophysical modelling and (AI and vp/vs) rock physics template analysis derived from well data in the carbonate fault-controlled reservoir: A case study from the North Beda Field, Amin High, Sirt Basin, Libya

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学
Mohammed S. Gumati
{"title":"Fluid and lithology discrimination using integrated facies, petrophysical modelling and (AI and vp/vs) rock physics template analysis derived from well data in the carbonate fault-controlled reservoir: A case study from the North Beda Field, Amin High, Sirt Basin, Libya","authors":"Mohammed S. Gumati","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01447-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rock physics template (RPT) represents a trustful method to understand the reservoir properties and attempts to predict the reservoir’s behaviour under various porosity levels, water saturation and clay content. However, many RPT applications were applied on clastic rocks compared to carbonates due to their complex pore systems. Therefore, this study attempts to construct a suitable RPT for the Beda carbonate reservoir, with 3D facies and petrophysical models based on well log data collected from 41 wells of North Beda Field in the western Sirt Basin. Seven wells include core permeability, porosity and lithology data. Two main bounding faults are identified based on well-correlation and divided the reservoir architectural structure into an exposed fault-block and also have controlled subsurface reservoir heterogeneities, lithofacies and petrophysical parameters distributions. However, core data analysis has revealed that the Beda reservoir is made up of four main types of lithofacies, which are classified as Lithofacies A (limestone), Lithofacies B (dolostone), Lithofacies C (shale) and Lithofacies D (shaly limestone) deposited in a wide range of shallow-marine environments. Lithofacies A and B are categorised as having good to excellent carbonate reservoir quality with an average 23% porosity and &gt; 160 mD permeability. According to the log response characteristics, the reservoir consists of a series of electrofacies patterns, which are divided into nine isolated vertical units, reflecting differences in petrophysical properties. The AI-<i>v</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><i>/v</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> crossplots show that the shale and clean carbonate line can easily be distinguished. A higher shale content zone is characterised by increased <i>v</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><i>/v</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> ratios and decreased AI. Additionally, crossplots with porosity colour-scale successfully divided the reservoir into three porosity zones: excellent, fair to very good and poor. Crossplots comparison between two wells from hanging and footwall sides shows that the shale volume and the water saturation have increased in the hanging wall well and decreased in the footwall well, which indicates an increasing in the hydrocarbon saturation with a relative decrease in acoustic impedance and <i>v</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><i>/v</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> values. Results prove that faults and fractures played pivotal roles in enhancing reservoir quality in the high area by enabling larger volumes of fluids to be filtrated and migrated. Besides, the RPT provides robust control of well log data and elastic properties to differentiate the lithology and fluid content in the carbonate reservoir.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"73 2","pages":"1427 - 1448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-024-01447-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rock physics template (RPT) represents a trustful method to understand the reservoir properties and attempts to predict the reservoir’s behaviour under various porosity levels, water saturation and clay content. However, many RPT applications were applied on clastic rocks compared to carbonates due to their complex pore systems. Therefore, this study attempts to construct a suitable RPT for the Beda carbonate reservoir, with 3D facies and petrophysical models based on well log data collected from 41 wells of North Beda Field in the western Sirt Basin. Seven wells include core permeability, porosity and lithology data. Two main bounding faults are identified based on well-correlation and divided the reservoir architectural structure into an exposed fault-block and also have controlled subsurface reservoir heterogeneities, lithofacies and petrophysical parameters distributions. However, core data analysis has revealed that the Beda reservoir is made up of four main types of lithofacies, which are classified as Lithofacies A (limestone), Lithofacies B (dolostone), Lithofacies C (shale) and Lithofacies D (shaly limestone) deposited in a wide range of shallow-marine environments. Lithofacies A and B are categorised as having good to excellent carbonate reservoir quality with an average 23% porosity and > 160 mD permeability. According to the log response characteristics, the reservoir consists of a series of electrofacies patterns, which are divided into nine isolated vertical units, reflecting differences in petrophysical properties. The AI-vp/vs crossplots show that the shale and clean carbonate line can easily be distinguished. A higher shale content zone is characterised by increased vp/vs ratios and decreased AI. Additionally, crossplots with porosity colour-scale successfully divided the reservoir into three porosity zones: excellent, fair to very good and poor. Crossplots comparison between two wells from hanging and footwall sides shows that the shale volume and the water saturation have increased in the hanging wall well and decreased in the footwall well, which indicates an increasing in the hydrocarbon saturation with a relative decrease in acoustic impedance and vp/vs values. Results prove that faults and fractures played pivotal roles in enhancing reservoir quality in the high area by enabling larger volumes of fluids to be filtrated and migrated. Besides, the RPT provides robust control of well log data and elastic properties to differentiate the lithology and fluid content in the carbonate reservoir.

基于断控型碳酸盐岩油藏井数据,利用综合相、岩石物理建模和(AI和vp/vs)岩石物理模板分析进行流体和岩性识别:以利比亚Sirt盆地Amin High的North Beda油田为例
岩石物理模板(RPT)是一种可靠的方法,可以了解储层的性质,并试图预测储层在不同孔隙度、含水饱和度和粘土含量下的行为。然而,由于碎屑岩的孔隙系统复杂,与碳酸盐岩相比,许多RPT应用于碎屑岩。因此,本研究试图基于Sirt盆地西部北Beda油田41口井的测井数据,建立适合于Beda碳酸盐岩储层的三维相和岩石物理模型。7口井包括岩心渗透率、孔隙度和岩性数据。在良好对比的基础上,识别出两条主边界断裂,将储层构型划分为暴露断块,并控制了地下储层非均质性、岩相及岩石物性参数的分布。岩心分析表明,贝达储层主要由4种岩相组成,分别为A岩相(灰岩)、B岩相(白云岩)、C岩相(页岩)和D岩相(泥质灰岩),沉积在广泛的浅海环境中。A岩相和B岩相具有良好至优良的碳酸盐岩储层质量,平均孔隙度为23%,渗透率为160 mD。根据测井响应特征,储层由一系列电相模式组成,在垂向上划分为9个孤立单元,反映了岩石物性的差异。AI-vp/vs交叉图表明,页岩线和清洁碳酸盐线可以很容易地区分。页岩含量越高,其特征是vp/vs比值越高,AI越低。此外,利用孔隙度色标交叉图成功地将储层划分为3个孔隙度区:优良、一般至极好和差。上、下盘两口井对比图显示,上盘井页岩体积和含水饱和度增大,下盘井页岩含水饱和度减小,表明油气饱和度增大,声阻抗和vp/vs值相对减小。研究结果表明,断层和裂缝在提高高区储层质量方面发挥了关键作用,使大量流体得以过滤和运移。此外,RPT还提供了对测井数据和弹性特性的强大控制,以区分碳酸盐岩储层的岩性和流体含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信