Quantifying the Sim2Real Gap: Model-Based Verification and Validation in Autonomous Ground Systems

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 ROBOTICS
Ammar Waheed;Madhu Areti;Luke Gallantree;Zohaib Hasnain
{"title":"Quantifying the Sim2Real Gap: Model-Based Verification and Validation in Autonomous Ground Systems","authors":"Ammar Waheed;Madhu Areti;Luke Gallantree;Zohaib Hasnain","doi":"10.1109/LRA.2025.3546126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantifying the Sim2Real gap is crucial for validating autonomous ground systems, enabling robust algorithm testing in simulations before real-world deployment, thereby reducing costs and time. This study introduces the Vinnicombe (<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\nu$</tex-math></inline-formula>-gap) metric as a quantitative tool for assessing this gap. To achieve this, a non-holonomic skid-steer differential drive robot was used. The <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\nu$</tex-math></inline-formula>-gap metric compares two dynamical control systems and returns a value between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates identical systems and 1 indicates significantly different systems. A linear time-invariant dynamic model, optimized through a genetic algorithm, was employed to ensure accurate representation of system behavior across varying conditions. Unlike task-specific metrics focused on localized errors, the <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\nu$</tex-math></inline-formula>-gap metric provides a holistic assessment by capturing system-wide differences. The <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\nu$</tex-math></inline-formula>-gap metric quantified significant differences with a maximum of 0.64 between real-world and simulated trials highlighting discrepancies in vehicle-environment interactions. Terrain-induced changes in real-world comparisons were quantified with values up to 0.27, reflecting increased compliance and friction on rubber-like surfaces versus concrete. Internal system changes were also identified with <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\nu$</tex-math></inline-formula>-gap values between 0.25 and 0.32, demonstrating sensitivity to changes in vehicle dynamics. These findings highlight the <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\nu$</tex-math></inline-formula>-gap metric's utility in enhancing simulation fidelity and reducing reliance on resource-intensive real-world testing.","PeriodicalId":13241,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","volume":"10 4","pages":"3819-3826"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10904321/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying the Sim2Real gap is crucial for validating autonomous ground systems, enabling robust algorithm testing in simulations before real-world deployment, thereby reducing costs and time. This study introduces the Vinnicombe ($\nu$-gap) metric as a quantitative tool for assessing this gap. To achieve this, a non-holonomic skid-steer differential drive robot was used. The $\nu$-gap metric compares two dynamical control systems and returns a value between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates identical systems and 1 indicates significantly different systems. A linear time-invariant dynamic model, optimized through a genetic algorithm, was employed to ensure accurate representation of system behavior across varying conditions. Unlike task-specific metrics focused on localized errors, the $\nu$-gap metric provides a holistic assessment by capturing system-wide differences. The $\nu$-gap metric quantified significant differences with a maximum of 0.64 between real-world and simulated trials highlighting discrepancies in vehicle-environment interactions. Terrain-induced changes in real-world comparisons were quantified with values up to 0.27, reflecting increased compliance and friction on rubber-like surfaces versus concrete. Internal system changes were also identified with $\nu$-gap values between 0.25 and 0.32, demonstrating sensitivity to changes in vehicle dynamics. These findings highlight the $\nu$-gap metric's utility in enhancing simulation fidelity and reducing reliance on resource-intensive real-world testing.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1428
期刊介绍: The scope of this journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles that provide a timely and concise account of innovative research ideas and application results, reporting significant theoretical findings and application case studies in areas of robotics and automation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信