Pediatric Resuscitative Thoracotomy in Infants, Children, and Early Adolescents: A Scoping Review

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Alexandria L. Soto MA , Akosua D. Odei BA , Cathlyn K. Medina BA , Steven W. Thornton MD , Samantha Kaplan PhD , Emily Greenwald MD , Elisabeth T. Tracy MD
{"title":"Pediatric Resuscitative Thoracotomy in Infants, Children, and Early Adolescents: A Scoping Review","authors":"Alexandria L. Soto MA ,&nbsp;Akosua D. Odei BA ,&nbsp;Cathlyn K. Medina BA ,&nbsp;Steven W. Thornton MD ,&nbsp;Samantha Kaplan PhD ,&nbsp;Emily Greenwald MD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth T. Tracy MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recent publications sought to define the role of resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in the pediatric population; however, few studies guide its use in young children and infants. This review characterizes the presentation and outcomes of patients ≤15 y old undergoing RT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review querying publications in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus prior to March 2024 was conducted using Covidence software. Eligible articles reported outcomes of patients aged ≤15 y old receiving RT for traumatic injury. The exclusion criteria included non-English, data in aggregate with patients &gt;15 y old or lack of outcomes. Eligible articles underwent data extraction for mechanism of injury, hospital presentation, procedure details, and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search imported 1550 articles, 294 underwent full-text review, and 26 were included. Notably, 85 articles were excluded for failing to separate pediatric and adult outcomes. Reviewed literature reported on 459 pediatric patients, of which 81 survived (17.6%). Age reporting varied as follows: 10 articles reported the exact age, 5 reported age buckets, and 11 reported an age range only. Of the survivors with known ages, three were &lt;1 y old, seven were 1-4 y old, ten were 5-9 y old, and 39 were 10-15 y old.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The utility and indications for pediatric RT are understudied in the youngest children. Current literature is limited by inconsistent reporting and poor data granularity. Establishing universal reporting guidelines for pediatric RT will help build complete, uniform databases. A preliminary reporting checklist is proposed to improve data sharing in pediatric RT literature, serving as a first step toward developing evidence-based protocols for young children and infants undergoing RT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Recent publications sought to define the role of resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in the pediatric population; however, few studies guide its use in young children and infants. This review characterizes the presentation and outcomes of patients ≤15 y old undergoing RT.

Methods

A scoping review querying publications in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus prior to March 2024 was conducted using Covidence software. Eligible articles reported outcomes of patients aged ≤15 y old receiving RT for traumatic injury. The exclusion criteria included non-English, data in aggregate with patients >15 y old or lack of outcomes. Eligible articles underwent data extraction for mechanism of injury, hospital presentation, procedure details, and survival.

Results

The search imported 1550 articles, 294 underwent full-text review, and 26 were included. Notably, 85 articles were excluded for failing to separate pediatric and adult outcomes. Reviewed literature reported on 459 pediatric patients, of which 81 survived (17.6%). Age reporting varied as follows: 10 articles reported the exact age, 5 reported age buckets, and 11 reported an age range only. Of the survivors with known ages, three were <1 y old, seven were 1-4 y old, ten were 5-9 y old, and 39 were 10-15 y old.

Conclusions

The utility and indications for pediatric RT are understudied in the youngest children. Current literature is limited by inconsistent reporting and poor data granularity. Establishing universal reporting guidelines for pediatric RT will help build complete, uniform databases. A preliminary reporting checklist is proposed to improve data sharing in pediatric RT literature, serving as a first step toward developing evidence-based protocols for young children and infants undergoing RT.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信