Prior Emergency Department Utilization Association With Nonaccidental Trauma in Children

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
R. Scott Eldredge MD , Jefferson Lin MS , Stephanie Zimmerman MD , Lucia Mirea PhD , Gevork Harootunian PhD , Lois W. Sayrs PhD , David M. Notrica MD
{"title":"Prior Emergency Department Utilization Association With Nonaccidental Trauma in Children","authors":"R. Scott Eldredge MD ,&nbsp;Jefferson Lin MS ,&nbsp;Stephanie Zimmerman MD ,&nbsp;Lucia Mirea PhD ,&nbsp;Gevork Harootunian PhD ,&nbsp;Lois W. Sayrs PhD ,&nbsp;David M. Notrica MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Physical child abuse (PCA) is believed to occur in an escalating manner with multiple episodes occurring over time. This pattern may potentially lead to multiple emergency department (ED) visits, often to different EDs. The aim of this study was to evaluate prior ED utilization as a risk factor for PCA in children.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective case-control study was conducted of children evaluated for potential PCA at a level I pediatric trauma center. Cases included patients deemed probable PCA by the hospital forensic team. Demographic data of cases was transferred to the Center for Health Information and Research for statewide matching with accidental injury controls based on age and time of injury. Additional information on all prior ED visits (for any reason) in the state within 4 y was extracted for all cases and controls. Logistic regression assessed the relationship of prior ED utilization with PCA for patients with ≥1 prior ED visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the total 518 patients identified, only 303 (58%) had at least one prior ED visit and were analyzed. PCA cases <em>versus</em> accidental injury controls were more likely to be younger (1.5 ± 1.8 <em>versus</em> 1.9 ± 2.0 y, <em>P</em> = 0.04), have Medicaid (86% <em>versus</em> 72%, <em>P</em> = 0.01), and ≥2 prior ED visits (62% <em>versus</em> 48%, odds ratio 1.76 [1.11-2.8] <em>P</em> = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient age, race, and payer status, each additional prior ED visit increased the odds of PCA by 19% (adjusted odds ratio 1.19 [1.03 – 1.39], <em>P</em> = 0.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Frequency of prior ED utilization is an independent risk factor for PCA. Each prior ED utilization increases a patient's odds for child abuse by 19%. A history of multiple prior ED may be used to help predict nonaccidental trauma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002248042500068X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Physical child abuse (PCA) is believed to occur in an escalating manner with multiple episodes occurring over time. This pattern may potentially lead to multiple emergency department (ED) visits, often to different EDs. The aim of this study was to evaluate prior ED utilization as a risk factor for PCA in children.

Materials and methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted of children evaluated for potential PCA at a level I pediatric trauma center. Cases included patients deemed probable PCA by the hospital forensic team. Demographic data of cases was transferred to the Center for Health Information and Research for statewide matching with accidental injury controls based on age and time of injury. Additional information on all prior ED visits (for any reason) in the state within 4 y was extracted for all cases and controls. Logistic regression assessed the relationship of prior ED utilization with PCA for patients with ≥1 prior ED visits.

Results

Of the total 518 patients identified, only 303 (58%) had at least one prior ED visit and were analyzed. PCA cases versus accidental injury controls were more likely to be younger (1.5 ± 1.8 versus 1.9 ± 2.0 y, P = 0.04), have Medicaid (86% versus 72%, P = 0.01), and ≥2 prior ED visits (62% versus 48%, odds ratio 1.76 [1.11-2.8] P = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient age, race, and payer status, each additional prior ED visit increased the odds of PCA by 19% (adjusted odds ratio 1.19 [1.03 – 1.39], P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Frequency of prior ED utilization is an independent risk factor for PCA. Each prior ED utilization increases a patient's odds for child abuse by 19%. A history of multiple prior ED may be used to help predict nonaccidental trauma.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信