Digital panda nationalism: Constructing nationalist discourse through metaphors in Chinese social media

IF 2.3 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Chunyan Huang , Haiyan Wang
{"title":"Digital panda nationalism: Constructing nationalist discourse through metaphors in Chinese social media","authors":"Chunyan Huang ,&nbsp;Haiyan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By analyzing the metaphors used in Weibo discussions about the giant panda Ya Ya’s travails in the United States in 2023, this study illuminates how Chinese netizens construct nationalist discourse on social media platforms. Employing the method of Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA), we explore how nationalism is articulated through both personification and de-personification discourse strategies in the shape of metaphor. We find that the giant panda, as China’s national symbol, is personified to evoke empathy and to unite Chinese netizens in opposition to the United States. This personification also serves to map China’s humiliating historical experiences with its powerful present, reinforcing national dignity. The binary personification of a positive in-group (China) versus a negative out-group (the United States) strengthens Chinese netizens' national identity. Meanwhile, the United States and its citizens are degraded as negatively connotated animals such as dogs and pigs, objects such as rubbish and mildew, and even evil, through dehumanizing metaphors. Mediated by Weibo mechanisms, dichotomous discourse amplifies the spread of nationalism and mobilizes netizens to engage in petitions. Overall, this study contributes to understanding digital nationalism and Sino-US relations from a micro-discursive perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 100869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695825000182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By analyzing the metaphors used in Weibo discussions about the giant panda Ya Ya’s travails in the United States in 2023, this study illuminates how Chinese netizens construct nationalist discourse on social media platforms. Employing the method of Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA), we explore how nationalism is articulated through both personification and de-personification discourse strategies in the shape of metaphor. We find that the giant panda, as China’s national symbol, is personified to evoke empathy and to unite Chinese netizens in opposition to the United States. This personification also serves to map China’s humiliating historical experiences with its powerful present, reinforcing national dignity. The binary personification of a positive in-group (China) versus a negative out-group (the United States) strengthens Chinese netizens' national identity. Meanwhile, the United States and its citizens are degraded as negatively connotated animals such as dogs and pigs, objects such as rubbish and mildew, and even evil, through dehumanizing metaphors. Mediated by Weibo mechanisms, dichotomous discourse amplifies the spread of nationalism and mobilizes netizens to engage in petitions. Overall, this study contributes to understanding digital nationalism and Sino-US relations from a micro-discursive perspective.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信